Not exact matches
I thought those days were over since it's been shown conclusively that using the
raw data without adjustments
yields a similar global warming picture.
A cooling trend is observed in the
raw and USHCN V2 records for the past 12 years... In both the short and longer term cases the USHCN V2 adjusted
data yielded trends that were roughly 1ºC per century higher than those found in the
raw temperature records.»
If you assume the differences in the
data sets are perturbative (they almost have to be if you get nearly the same answer for the global means), then subtracting the adjusted versus
raw data in a self - consistent manner should
yield information about how well the adjustment process is working.
It is visually apparent in Fig. 4B that removing the oscillatory AMO from the
raw data organizes the
data points into a monotonic band and
yields a more stable linear trend, converging to the 50 - y trend of 0.08 °C / decade.
The amplitude of each fingerprint that is consistent with
data is estimated as a distribution of «scaling factors» (top panel in Figure 5), which when multiplied by the
raw model results
yields a distribution of the contribution of each forcing to the total observed anomaly (middle panel) and a residual variability notexplained by forcings (bottom panel; see also Figure 1, bottom panel and Hegerl & Zwiers, 2011 for more detail).
Your searches will
yield a lot of
raw data in terms of personal names, case names and legal documents that you will need to use your own judgement when analyzing.