I was concerned going in that the panel would merely
re-hash old arguments.
This is a contrarian group that is
re-hashing old arguments and not using the state - of - the - art scientific literature in good faith to come up with a coherent analysis that counters the scientific findings synthesized in the IPCC assessment reports, which ARE by leading experts.
Not exact matches
Without
re-hashing the
arguments for and against a wholly appointed chamber, those who seek change in the name of `' modernity» and so - called `' democracy» should take heed of the
old Conservative maxim, «to change what is worst and conserve what is best».