Not exact matches
After several days considering the case, the jury informed the judge they would not
even be able to
reach a majority
verdict.
The second episode of the new Hitman game is upon us and after numerous play through and a playtime of too many hours to
even share with you we finally
reached a
verdict.
As well there is the dogmatic insistence that the climategate emails must be investigated until a guilty
verdict is
reached,
even though, at least in the country I live in, that kind of evidence is inadmissible in court.
Jury nullification in the broader sense can cause cases to be thrown out by a judge or on appeal for reasons # 4 or # 5, but most of the time, jury nullification will not cause a
verdict to be thrown out by a judge or on appeal (
even if statements from jurors after the trial make it clear that jury nullification in the broader sense actually took place), if a jury that weighed the evidence and evaluated the credibility of the witnesses differently than the actual jury did could have
reached the same
verdict.
With the very narrow, newly created exception for guilty
verdicts in criminal cases
reached based upon racial or other kinds of impermissible prejudice rather than the facts of the case (or cases where there is an outside influence on the jury such as a bribe or someone looking up facts or law on the Internet), no one can challenge a jury
verdict based upon the reasoning and conclusions actually made by the jurors,
even if someone learns that the jury knowingly or accidentally didn't follow the law or was mistaken about the facts.
Often everyone
even knows that the jury
reached its
verdict because it misunderstood the law or the facts, based upon interviews with the jurors immediately following the trial, but nothing can be done about that to reverse a jury
verdict if a sincere jury following the instructions could have
reached the same conclusion if they'd viewed the credibility of the witnesses differently.