Sentences with phrase «reach equilibrium over»

Since Golem works as a marketplace, therefore, these prices will reach equilibrium over time.

Not exact matches

And if we've learned anything over the last few years, it's that expected returns do not equal realized returns, and expensive markets don't have to crash in order to reach some sort of equilibrium.

And that provided we significantly curb emissions over the next couple of decades, a new equilibrium will be reached.

Given those two factors and ignoring future emissions that will drive the temperature even higher, we are already over +2 C warming once we stop emitting short - lived coal smoke and other pollutants into the air and we give the Earth time to reach temperature equilibrium.

Not only do you («you» as in Victor and not the general you, because I presume there are people who actually model these things and may know the answer) not know how large the equilibrium response would be, but you don't know if the boundary proposed by your argument (cognate to the equilibrium response) had been reached over that period.

Once the ice reaches the equator, the equilibrium climate is significantly colder than what would initiate melting at the equator, but if CO2 from geologic emissions build up (they would, but very slowly — geochemical processes provide a negative feedback by changing atmospheric CO2 in response to climate changes, but this is generally very slow, and thus can not prevent faster changes from faster external forcings) enough, it can initiate melting — what happens then is a runaway in the opposite direction (until the ice is completely gone — the extreme warmth and CO2 amount at that point, combined with left - over glacial debris available for chemical weathering, will draw CO2 out of the atmosphere, possibly allowing some ice to return).

The first rate seems to be far slower because there are no winds in the stratosphere so that equilibrium can only be reached by diffusion of heat which is really slow; on the other hand we are pumpimg around 1.5 ppm of CO2 into the troposphere every year, over a base value of around 380 ppm.

We can now argue about whether the GH warming has reached «equilibrium» over the past 150 years or whether there is still some GH warming «hidden in the pipeline», but IMO that is like arguing about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

On the left, half of all farms adopt the practice over 5 years, and it takes 5 years for carbon to reach its equilibrium value.

Once thermal equilibrium has been reached between surface and atmosphere the surface will have become warm enough to both cycle energy between the surface and the atmosphere in perpetuity via conduction and convection AND have enough warmth left over to emit energy from the top of the atmosphere as fast as new energy comes in from the sun.

Thus even there, a new equilibrium is reached in a few decades (for extra CO2 over current land occupation) to millennia (for ice sheet retraction and plant spread).

In reality, we have a situation where no equilibrium is reached (and probably will not be reached in short term), because the extra input increases slightly exponential over time.

Thus if we could stop today with all emissions, nature still would be a net sink, but the (average) sink rate would decrease to zero over time when the basic equilibrium setpoint is reached, about 290 ppmv for the current temperature.

Yes, by gosh, the system in fig. 2 with real non-perfect insulator will reach thermal equilibrium over time by 0th law.

Over time, I would expect the system to reach thermal equilibrium.

So asserting that heat won't flow in figure 2 above, or will stop flowing before all of the gas reaches thermal equilibrium, is just like saying that heat won't flow between two ordinary jars of gas at different temperatures in the laboratory, and well over a hundred years of experiments, the entire refrigeration and air conditioning industry, a huge body of technology and engineering, and well understood physical theories all say otherwise.

Over time a new equilibrium is reached.

It is defined as the amount of warming expected if carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations doubled from pre-industrial levels and then remained constant until Earth's temperature reached a new equilibrium over timescales of centuries to millennia.

It would increase rapidly at first, with the temperature increase slowing over time until equilibrium was reached.

There is currently a global energy imbalance, and reaching a new equilibrium state will take over a century.

The first graph shows how the average daily temperature changes over the full time period — making it easy to see equilibrium being reached.

The TCR is a more useful indicator for predictions over the next century because reaching equilibrium can take a few hundred years.

And that provided we significantly curb emissions over the next couple of decades, a new equilibrium will be reached.