Sentences with phrase «reach factual conclusions»

If a tribunal has turned its mind to the right question and there is any evidence on the record upon which a tribunal could properly have reached a factual conclusion, then there has been no reviewable error of law or jurisdiction.

So long as the administrative board reached its factual conclusions in a manner that was not obviously biased or unreasonable, then their factual findings will be respected by the reviewing judge.

Not exact matches

If you hold these three tenets to be factual, I don't see how you can reconcile them and not reach the conclusion that your god is a terrible being.

Based on the data in the paper and conclusions reached, it seems to be a factual statement that those people that meet the criteria which others have had success discharging their loans will have a better chance of discharging the student loans.

We can only hope that The Post «s editorial board will also reach a reasonable conclusion about their editorial policy: that they should adopt a practice of ensuring their opinion pieces on climate are factual and not misleading, with the operative assumption that the world's scientists actually are right about the subjects that they have spent their lives studying.

In the legal context, the syllogism involves taking a legal premise (an enacted or judicially created «rule») and applying it to a factual premise (the facts of a case) to reach an objectively sound result (the conclusion).

In Standard Bank plc, the conclusion reached was that those named on the draft indictment would be named, as would be the bank's senior deal team member, but that the remaining individuals whose conduct was relevant to the factual narrative would remain anonymous.

If the court concludes from the evidence in a particular case that the amount of the award reached through application of the guidelines would be unjust, the court shall enter a written finding articulating the factual circumstances supporting that conclusion.

In reaching this conclusion, the Newsome court noted that other courts addressing this factual scenario have uniformly held that a joint client suing only the joint attorney can compel the disclosure of privileged documents from the joint representation.

It relies on these incorrect facts about PRISM to reach its conclusion, removing the factual basis for its overall findings.