It can take 3 to 6 times longer for darkly pigmented skin to
reach the equilibrium concentration of skin vitamin D.
Much as a drop of dye in a set of connected containers will diffuse between them until
reaching some equilibrium concentration, at rates dependent upon exchange rates, bomb - spiked C14 CO2 will reduce its level in the atmosphere at a fairly quick rate, replaced by other isotopes in relation to their concentration, because quite frankly there is more C14 at the spike point (atmosphere) than in the oceans.
Not exact matches
It represents the warming at the earth's surface that is expected after the
concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere doubles and the climate subsequently stabilizes (
reaches equilibrium).
The idea of climate inertia is that when you increase the CO2
concentration in the atmosphere it takes the climate system a good deal of time for all its components to fully adjust and
reach a new
equilibrium temperature.
And in the long term, human emissions would have to drop to ZERO in order to stabilize
concentrations, because the deep ocean will eventually
reach equilibrium with the surface layers.
The climate response does not
reach equilibrium at the peak, because it doesn't get a chance to: at the peak, the CO2
concentrations reverse direction and begin declining.
The approximately 20 - year lag (between atmospheric CO2
concentration change and
reaching equilibrium temperature) is an emerging property (just like sensitivity) of the global climate system in the GCM models used in the paper I linked to above, if I understood it correctly.
Now, should the reduced
concentration persist, more energy will continue to accumulate in the system until a new, higher
equilibrium temperature is
reached (the
equilibrium response).
[
Equilibrium] climate sensitivity is defined as the increase in global mean surface temperature (GMST), once the ocean has reached equilibrium, resulting from a doubling of the equivalent atmospheric CO2 concentration, being the concentration of CO2 that would cause the same radiative forcing as the given mixture of CO2 and other forcing
Equilibrium] climate sensitivity is defined as the increase in global mean surface temperature (GMST), once the ocean has
reached equilibrium, resulting from a doubling of the equivalent atmospheric CO2 concentration, being the concentration of CO2 that would cause the same radiative forcing as the given mixture of CO2 and other forcing
equilibrium, resulting from a doubling of the equivalent atmospheric CO2
concentration, being the
concentration of CO2 that would cause the same radiative forcing as the given mixture of CO2 and other forcing components.
It is defined as the amount of warming expected if carbon dioxide (CO2)
concentrations doubled from pre-industrial levels and then remained constant until Earth's temperature
reached a new
equilibrium over timescales of centuries to millennia.
If surface pH was in
equilibrium with the atmosphere, then CO2
concentrations would have hovered around 2000 ppm, but there is no consensus that CO2
reached those levels.
One key point is whether the simple method you've used here provides a reliable estimate of ECS, which is defined as the long - term change in global mean temperature for a doubling of the CO2
concentration, once the temperature has
reached equilibrium.
But then I read IPCC FAR WG1 s. 1.2.1, which includes this stunning nugget: [quote -RCB- The
concentration [of CO2 following a pulse] will actually never return to its original value, but
reach a new
equilibrium level, about 15 percent of the total amount of CO2 emitted will remain in the atmosphere.