Sentences with phrase «reaches equilibrium when»

The system reaches equilibrium when the shell emits 256 W / m2 to space, and then it also emits 256 to the surface, 512 in total, which must all come from the surface, the only source.

Not exact matches

An object reaches the stationary levitated state when all the forces acting on it are in equilibrium.

Boltzmann discovered an equation giving the probability of a gas of molecules having a particular energy when it reaches equilibrium.

The idea of climate inertia is that when you increase the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere it takes the climate system a good deal of time for all its components to fully adjust and reach a new equilibrium temperature.

Hence, when the air temperature decreases, ice and snow fields grow, and this continues until an equilibrium is reached.

I think all closeted men and women eventually reach this breaking of the equilibrium, and that's when we finally say it out loud.

While I still haven't entirely renounced my beloved collection of stilettos, these days in my fifth month of pregnancy when my balance and equilibrium are a bit off (a common side effect of adjusting to a growing mid-section) you will most likely catch me reaching for midi - heels, kitten heels or chunky block heels during the work week.

He offered no guidance as to when production and demand for the iPad would reach equilibrium.

When the market is not priced correctly knowledgeable investors will quickly come in and either buy or sell to the point where the market reaches equilibrium.

Most of the time they will make money, because there is enough informationless volume trading back and forth, that they can take a few losses when information hits the market, and informed traders temporarily make money against intermediaries until a new equilibrium is reached.

However, when there is a lot of ice melting is it possible to reach equilibrium?

Since the energy emitted goes like T ^ 4 power, the earth thus emits less energy back into space, which is why it has to warm (until it reaches a temperature when the earth is again emitting as much energy back out into space as it receives from the sun and so is back in equilibrium).

Depending on meridional heat transport, when freezing temperatures reach deep enough towards low - latitudes, the ice - albedo feedback can become so effective that climate sensitivity becomes infinite and even negative (implying unstable equilibrium for any «ice - line» (latitude marking the edge of ice) between the equator and some other latitude).

As such, when emissions quit rising, according to their framework, the climate system is no longer being forced, but the temperature will continue to rise and it will still take a considerable amount of time for the system to reach equilibrium.

When we stop raising the level of carbon dioxide, the temperature continues to rise because it takes a while for the climate system to reach equilibrium.

When it starts to change by degrees, it won't be in equilibrium, but once CO2 levels hold more steady, staying within a 5 % range, as they did in the last millennium, that kind of equilibrium will be reached again.

Your main mistake was: Illogically restricting climate - change discourse to forty years duration, when scientific evidence suggests that forcing reaches equilibrium only on a time - scale of centuries.

Thus if we could stop today with all emissions, nature still would be a net sink, but the (average) sink rate would decrease to zero over time when the basic equilibrium setpoint is reached, about 290 ppmv for the current temperature.

When did sea level rise reach equilibrium?

I accept the idea that for a system surrounded by a vacuum when radiation - rate - equilibrium is reached, the amount of energy per unit time leaving a system via radiation is equal to the amount of energy per unit time entering the system.

As I've said three times now (and you've ignored) Henry's law determines a fixed partitioning ratio between the atmosphere and oceans of 1:50 at equilibrium meaning that when equilibrium between PCO2 (g) and PCO2 (aq) is reached the oceans must contain about 50 times as much CO2 as the atmosphere.

For these conditions, when radiation - rate - equilibrium is reached for the «two - shell system» (i.e., when the rate of energy being radiated outward by the outer shell equals the rate of energy being generated in the wall of the inner shell, I believe the presence of body «A» will affect the temperature of the external surface of the inner shell.

And we will calculate the equilibrium condition — which is when steady - state is reached.

Another possibility is that the exchange would continue only until the new, combined wire - gas system reached its own equilibrium, in which we would not in general expect the gas to exhibit the same mean - molecular - kinetic energy profile it did when it was isolated.

When it is warm, ice melts faster and the glacier will retreat until it reaches a new equilibrium between accumulation and ablation.

Trick says: > «When Fig. 1 in top post is at equilibrium it has reached max.

When temperatures reach equilibrium gently agitate by an electromagnet acting with Lorentz force on the saline ions (geomagnetic storms).

If top post in this thread Fig. 1 is simply modified to show work crosses the control volume above & below, then it is proper to think the modified top post Fig. 1 when equilibrium is reached, that T indeed is isothermal.

An equilibrium response occurs when a new equilibrium is reached by a retreating glacier losing enough of its high ablating sections, usually at its lowest elevations, so that accumulation once again balances ablation.

So while, at first there is a difference (i.e. when the system is not at equilibrium), but once equilibrium is reached then they are equal at all frequencies.

Harold: DLR should cause your head should cool more slowly when you take your hat off and stabilize (reach equilibrium) at a higher temperature.

Transient response is the rise in 20 - year climate during the 70 years while CO2 is changing, while total response is that plus the eventual further rise in temperature thereafter, namely when equilibrium is once again reached, with no further changes to CO2 (since ECS is defined only for a doubling).

This is confirmed when he later says (also page 5): «When a blackbody has reached thermal equilibrium, it can no longer absorb more light for heating and therefore has to re-emit just as much light - energy as it is absorbwhen he later says (also page 5): «When a blackbody has reached thermal equilibrium, it can no longer absorb more light for heating and therefore has to re-emit just as much light - energy as it is absorbWhen a blackbody has reached thermal equilibrium, it can no longer absorb more light for heating and therefore has to re-emit just as much light - energy as it is absorbing.

When the variables which alter the level stored in the tub are changed (knobs turned) there will be an imbalance between inflow and outflow until the new equalibrium is reached — a equilibrium at which a different level of energy is stored in the tub.

When the system reaches equilibrium, the same number of photons will leave the gas column as enter.

When you put a 1 kW fan heater into a room, the air it'll put out will virtually immediately be at 60C, but the room will heat quite slowly, until after maybe an hour it reaches equilibrium, say at 22C.

All that happens when you start off with a very cold or a very hot «radiating temperature» relative to the incoming radiation is that the planet heats up or cools down until it reaches its equilibrium.

You based this on the following definition of the 2nd law: «'' When two isolated systems in separate but nearby regions of space, each in thermodynamic equilibrium in itslef, but not in equilibrium with each other t first, are at some time allowed to interact, breaking the isolation that separates the two systems, and they exchange matter or energy, they will eventually reach a mutual thermodynamic equilibrium.»

«When two isolated systems in separate but nearby regions of space, each in thermodynamic equilibrium in itself, but not in equilibrium with each other at first, are at some time allowed to interact, breaking the isolation that separates the two systems, and they exchange matter or energy, they will eventually reach a mutual thermodynamic equilibrium.»

From fig 3 it appears to some degree that land and sea temperatures align or reaches equilibrium mostly when temperature do not change fast.

You based this on the following definition of the 2nd law: ««When two isolated systems in separate but nearby regions of space, each in thermodynamic equilibrium in itself, but not in equilibrium with each other at first, are at some time allowed to interact, breaking the isolation that separates the two systems, and they exchange matter or energy, they will eventually reach a mutual thermodynamic equilibrium.»

Therefore when equilibrium is reached they will have zero net effect.

Remaining steady and calm during these moments is the key to supporting children through them; staying present with them until the emotional wave breaks and they reach a state of equilibrium allows them to feel safe, loved and acceptance when they are feeling out of control.