The RBMKs are earlier versions of the design that exploded at Chernobyl and even less safe, according to Morris Rosen, head of
reactor safety at the Inter national Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna.
Not exact matches
Fire protection piping
at Indian Point's Unit 2
reactor broke and leaked and though it resulted in a loss of water pressure to the fire suppression system, inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission determined it was of «very low
safety significance,» according to the N.R.C. report.
In the wake of the Japan crisis and an MSNBC report that one of the Indian Point
reactors is more
at risk for earthquake damage than any other in the nation — a claim refuted by the NRC — Cuomo called for a full
safety review of the plant.
NRDC has long opposed relicensing its two
reactors because of Indian Point's history of operational,
safety and environmental problems, as well as the grave risk of a nuclear accident so close to the nation's largest city,» said Kit Kennedy, director of the energy and transportation program
at the Natural Resources Defense Council.
The fire was extinguished quickly and caused no
safety problems
at the
reactor, but it spilled about 3,000 gallons of transformer fluid into the Hudson River.
The NRC staff will meet with the public to discuss the NRC's assessment of
safety performance
at Indian Point Units 2 and 3
reactors for 2015.
As ProPublica reported earlier, fire
safety is a continuing concern
at the country's 104 commercial
reactors, as is the volume of spent fuel piling up
at plants.
This structure, which rings the
reactor itself
at the bottom, has been known to be flawed for decades — as the NRC's Charles Casto, who flew to Japan to assist, outlined on March 16, discussing the NRC's
safety guidelines for this type of
reactor or NUREG.
But the
reactors are designed to be integrated into manufacturing plants to improve their efficiency and
safety, says Christian Hornung, a chemical engineer and 3D printing expert
at CSIRO Manufacturing in Melbourne, Australia.
A few days after the nuclear crisis began to unfold
at the Fukushima power station in Japan, Singh, who also serves as minister in charge for atomic energy, ordered a
safety review of all 20 nuclear power plants and a half dozen research
reactors owned and operated by the government.
The rest of this special News & Analysis section examines what we have learned about radiation risks from previous exposures (p. 1504), improvements in
safety since the boiling water designs
at Fukushima (p. 1506), what to do with the wrecked
reactors (p. 1507), and damage to research facilities from the earthquake (p. 1509).
But such
reactors still require the same electricity - generating,
safety, and waste disposal systems as the hulking light - water
reactors presently being built as well as identical rigorous licensing requirements,
at least in the U.S. — and that may cost them.
This is one of many
safety issues currently being investigated by his team
at the UK Office for Nuclear Regulation in Bootle, as it considers licensing new, supposedly safer,
reactor designs from companies like Japanese - owned Westinghouse Electric and French - owned Areva.
«It was nowhere near as complex of a release as Chernobyl, which was everything from the core of the
reactor,» says Peter Caracappa, a radiation
safety officer and clinical assistant professor of nuclear engineering
at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y. «This was a slow release,» he adds, and it was limited to a few radioactive materials, including iodine 131, which has a half - life of just eight days and therefore does not lead to long - term contamination.
With nuclear
safety in the spotlight since the 2011
reactor meltdown
at Japan's Fukushima plant - which in turn prompted Germany to call time on its entire nuclear fleet - operators can take no chances with their elderly plants, but the outages get longer and more difficult.
A Commission official says that in the light of Bulgaria's decision to restart the
reactor, member countries have frozen a further 7 million Ecus set aside for
safety at Kozloduy.
When I read about the new
safety features in the proposed nuclear
reactors at Hinkley Point in the UK (19...
In response to the earthquake - triggered accident
at the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan, India's prime minister has asked for a full
safety audit of India's 20 operating nuclear
reactors.
As of midday Thursday, the country's Nuclear and Industrial
Safety Agency spokesperson Yoshitaka Nagayama, noted that «because we have been unable to go to the scene, we can not confirm whether there is water left or not in the spent fuel pool
at reactor No. 4,» The New York Times reported.
«By allowing this
reactor to continue operating with equipment that can not perform its only
safety function, the NRC is putting people living around Indian Point
at elevated and undue risk,» Lochbaum writes.
Flaws in the boiling - water
reactor safety system
at Fukushima Daiichi (as well as Oyster Creek and Vermont Yankee) had been known since 1972.
The simplified AP1000
safety system is known as a «passive» design, in that if there were a failure similar to what happened
at Fukushima, human intervention would not be required to shut down a
reactor.
But the obvious implications from the Fukushima accident point to the need to raise the
safety bar
at U.S.
reactors, they said.
That analysis was carried out for two
reactors at a plant in Ohi on the Japan Sea coast and submitted for review to Japan's Nuclear and Industrial
Safety Agency (NISA), which concluded they had passed.
But neither the South Texas facility nor the applications for new
reactors at Calvert Cliffs in Maryland and the Shearon Harris nuclear plant outside Raleigh, N.C., have completed the NRC's long design
safety and feasibility evaluation, which could take years to complete.
Tim Murphy, head of environmental appraisal
at the EBRD, says the
reactors should be brought up to the
safety standards that would be applied in the West «for the backfitting of existing facilities.»
The unit is expected to become the fifth Japanese
reactor to resume operation under new
safety standards introduced following the March 2011 accident
at the Fukushima Daiichi plant.
The device will be used to calibrate
safety detectors
at nuclear
reactors in the United Kingdom.
It noted the high cost of upgrading the
reactor to meet new
safety standards introduced following the March 2011 accident
at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.
Secondly it will allow the government to order the shutdown of a
reactor, temporarily
at least, without any objective shortcomings
at the level of the existing legal
safety requirements, for purely political reasons.
Despite these issues, Orbach offered some technical solutions to improve
safety at similar
reactors in other parts of the world.
CCS has not yet been commercially deployed
at any centralized power plant; the existing nuclear industry, based on
reactor designs more than a half - century old and facing renewed public concerns of
safety, is in a period of retrenchment, not expansion; and existing solar, wind, biomass, and energy storage systems are not yet mature enough to provide affordable baseload power
at terawatt scale.