The public doesn't
read appellate decisions.
Just
read the appellate decisions that overturned Bharara's cases.
At LawReader
we read every appellate decision and seldom find quotations from French authors in the usually dry language of appellate decisions.
Not exact matches
In the end, there's nothing more frustrating to
read than
appellate writing that doesn't know where it's going, and evidences that it doesn't care, or has no sense, of where it stands in the «pantheon» of
appellate decision - making.
Read the Quebec
appellate court
decision here.
I've been
reading a lot of judges»
decisions recently, and I've noticed a type of comment that comes up frequently: comments that seem to only be provided in order to make it more difficult for an
appellate court to overturn their
decision.
Read the Saskatchewan
appellate court
decision here.
While all discretionary
decisions face a degree of deference from an
appellate court, the added «unfettered» nature of the reconsideration power could be
read to support additional deference on appeal.
Livent is an
appellate decision that
reads like a sociology paper.
After all, most of what law students
read are
appellate decisions, divorced from the human reality that spawned the dispute in the first place.
For an
appellate lawyer, perhaps the sweetest words one can
read from a panel (depending on what side one is on) are found at para. 46 of the
decision: (more...)
Every now and then I look at a new
appellate decision and experience the shock of
reading something that I would have guessed was certain to never come up before seeing it in print.
Read the British Columbia
appellate court
decision
This is not a game for pseudo-dilettantes to pretend they get how this works by
reading it in
appellate decisions and on the internet.
The remaining lawyers will focus on truly complex, unusual transactions; the little regulation that tech has not been able to circumvent; and litigation over law (just what you thought you would do when you were
reading all those
appellate decisions in law school, remember?)
Click here to
read a summary of the
appellate court's
decision in this case.