Sentences with phrase «read by a human being»

«You are our letter, written in our hearts, known and read by all human beings, and thereby made visible that you are a letter of Christ being ministered to by us, not written with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on stone tablets but on the physical tablets of the heart.»

Astonishingly, we are asked to believe it does not amount to mass surveillance but in fact «bulk interception», on the basis that not everything is being read by a human being.

Now, however, all resumes submitted through USAJOBS are actually read by a human being first, not a computer.

Whether your resume is read by a human being or processed electronically, keywords project the value and expertise that you bring to the table — whether you're a CEO or a truck driver.

And this physical version of our resume was read by a human being and stored in a file cabinet.

The problem is that it's not designing a resume that's meant to be read by human beings — it's designing a document that's meant to be read by search engine algorithms.

Including these words in your resume increases the chances that your resume will make it through the Applicant Tracking System (ATS) and be read by a human being.

Secondly, you need to take into account the fact that despite the technological advancement your resume will still be read by human beings.

They seem to be unaware that before a resume is ever seen or read by a human being it goes through an A.T.S., Your College Degree: We get it.

They seem to be unaware that before a resume is ever seen or read by a human being it goes through an A.T.S., Top 100 Most Powerful Resume Words.

If a résumé does not pass the ATS criteria, it is likely the résumé will never be read by a human being.

At that point, the content of what you submitted will determine whether it gets sucked into a black hole or actually gets read by a human being, the first step to getting an interview.

Not exact matches

The researchers are looking to develop the robot so it can learn to assemble furniture through human demonstration or by reading instructions.

In 2002, before the sale of PayPal even went through, Musk started voraciously reading about rocket technology, and later that year, with $ 100 million, he started one of the most unthinkable and ill - advised ventures of all time: a rocket company called SpaceX, whose stated purpose was to revolutionize the cost of space travel in order to make humans a multi-planetary species by colonizing Mars with at least a million people over the next century.

This is why we think the cowboy account is a great solution for human beings so enamored by stories (read: all human beings).

Reading Pierre Trudeau's remarks today, I'm struck by his foresight on issues like protection of fragile Arctic landscapes, and the capability of humans to push our species and others into extinction.

Editorial links are typically one - way, can not be bought, are hand picked by human editors, and are read primarily via email but then in some cases also archived on the web.

Though many reading this article may believe that writing about human psychology is a strange topic when it comes to investing, wealth building, and wealth preservation, if we can not identify the psychological manipulations to which we fall victim, then we will not be able to prevent and avoid being manipulated into bad decisions or a state of inertia by the world's financial leaders.

As for the way we hear God other than reading the bible, it is in our mind with a clarity not matched by any human person on earth.

The «fair reading model» is driven, Souter concluded, by an understandable yet nonetheless naive «longing for a world without ambiguity» - by the «basic human hunger for certainty and control.»

I have been a philosophy professor for many years and have not been as touched by what it means to be human as I have been today after reading your essay.

«god» doesn't exist and is make believe, your religious texts were written by human beings without any kind of «divine inspiration» regardless of what you read in them... written by people who thought the Earth was flat... it isn't.

On the reading I propose, the Reformation schism was brought about instead by contingent human choices in a confused historical context defined less by clear and principled theological argument (though that of course was present) than by a peculiar and distinctively sixteenth - century combination of overheated and ever - escalating polemics, cold - blooded Realpolitik, and fervid apocalyptic dreaming.

By my reading of both the human condition and our current culture, a project like Hart's is more important to the status of religion in public life than, say, arguments for a natural law.

If a person thinks that nature is wholly corrupt, that there is no natural morality knowable by human reason, that grace completely supplants nature, that the basis of morality is the divine command and not the essences of things as created by God — and some Protestant theologians can plausibly be read as having said such things — then all bets are off.

It's obvious by reading this article you have never expirenced nor have you encountered «evil» are a possessed human being..

And yet, in book after book, Glancy also offends many of her fellow Native writers — whose books she reads, as they read hers — by insisting that this absurdity, this intrusion of the Gospel, writ large in the history of Native Americans, is the experience of every tribe and every nation, everything and everyone human.

What we read in the Old Testament should not be interpreted as God's approval of such crimes against the human person, but rather we should see how far humanity had to mature, be healed and be guided by God in these times before Jesus Christ's revealing and redeeming work for us.

Read the news, look around you Cheese, are you happy with the state of humanity and comfortable with morality being determined by human nature.

I see humans read the Bible as if it were written originally by modern day americans using modern day English... one has to remember that the Bible was written from a Jewish culture of 2000 plus years ago..

While Lewis's remarks do not indicate any careful reading of Luther, it is true that Camus rejects a notion of «salvation by faith alone» on the grounds that it eliminates human freedom and, to that extent, would not accept the God of Luther, Calvin, or the later Augustine.

In my new book, We Make the Road by Walking, I read the Bible not as a static revelation of God in a system, but as a dynamic narrative of human discovery as old conceptions of God die and new conceptions are born in the vacuum.

Updike as a believer was saved by his reading of Barth, since he looked to him for «confirmation of the bad news about the human situation vis - à - vis ultimate reassurance.»

I recently read a book called God's Word in Human Words by Kenton Sparks, which is purportedly an evangelical defense of critical biblical scholarship.

This was vividly brought home to me recently, reading the vast work of academic moral philosophy On What Matters, by Derek Parfit, in which problems concerning the switching of trolleys from one rail to another in order to prevent or cause the deaths of those further down the line are presented as showing the essence of moral reasoning and its place in the life of human beings.

I'll judge them based on how they treat their fellow human beings, not by what book they read.

On this reading logical distinctions and orderings are human artifices, not to be identified as constitutive of the world as on the mathematical model described by Dewey for traditional metaphysics (PANW / 657).

«Math is a theoretical concept made up by humans» is by far the most ignorant statement I have read or heard in a long time.

Relying on intelligence dossiers prepared meticulously by his UDR commanders, he prepared intensively, making several dry runs by following the bread delivery van in which Hackett would ultimately die; he blocked out the reality that the target might be a family man with a pregnant wife and child awaiting his return home from work; he avoided reading the papers or listening to TV reports over the next days, because the stories tend to make a real human being out of what had to be thought of only as «the target.»

The next thing to say is that, as the believer, theologian, and preacher that I am, I read Scripture in the way followed before me by Chrysostom (regularly), Augustine (fitfully), and all Western professional exegetes since Colet, Luther, and Calvin that is, I approach the books as human documents produced by people of like passions with myself.

He responded by relating the parable of the Good Samaritan, one of my personal favorites... bear traps are hidden, and often unseen till bear or human are caught in them... the traps are deliberately placed, they don't just suddenly appear... the answer to the question was the man who had compassion on the man taken by robbers... he was a social and spiritual outcast who had compassion on someone who in normal circumstances would have hated his guts... because his doctrine and «lifestyle» were not acceptable to the religious establishment... I have had life experiences that bear this out, experiencing love and compassion from people whom today's religious establishment demonizes and looks down upon... any reading of the Good Samaritan story should be followed up by a reading of 1 Corinthians 13....

The Human Faces of God by Thom Stark is one of the best and most difficult books I have ever read.

We must adopt the critical approach and seek reality, here as well, by asking ourselves what human relation to real events this could have been which led gradually, along many by - paths and by way of many metamorphoses, from mouth to ear, from one memory to another, and from dream to dream, until it grew into the written account we have read.

Mainly, because in all the verbiage about freedoms of beliefs there is something so important, so blatantly acute yet everyone do not even mention it, except - oh genial me: Why would anyone in the whole world support any type of creed / belief / religion where a whole lot of humans — as in millions of human women — are not allowed to go to school, to even just read and write - less become a teacher, doctor, lawyer, president of their own companies, their own countries, mutilated by the millions when they reach puberty, WHY is this allowed?

Now, what a child of God does with His truth, is up to them (free will), but everyone needs to know that your soul depends on knowing His truth by reading the Bible, comprehending it, and then abiding (applying) His truth to their lives to produce His righteous truth in all thoughts / beliefs, writings, actions as He instructs us to live while house in human form.

As we read this history, the furor over stem cells was fueled by numerous factors: the near - universal human desire for magic; patients» desperation in the face of illness and their hope for cures; the belief that biology can now do anything; the reluctance of scientists to accept any limits (particularly moral limits) on their research; the impact of big money from biotech stocks, patents, and federal funding; the willingness of America's elite class to use every means possible to discredit religion in general; and the need to protect the unlimited abortion license by accepting no protections of unborn human life.

But he does not provide reason here for rejecting Ford's alternative reading that the concrete experience in question is that of the human observer and that the events in nature are constituted by their internal relations to all the others.

a Material minded human will not be able to expalin who the God is Please Read «the Philosophy of Divine Love», by Swami Prakashanand Saraswati.

souls is not male or female... read «Philoshophy of Divine Love» by Swami Prakashanand Saraswati... it is a wonderful book for those who really want to know who we are and why we are born as human....

Since in other places, however, he makes a strong case for human equality, which is not a function of particular traits or virtues, perhaps I am reading incorrectly what he means by «democratizing.»