It's very reassuring to
read the comments on this thread.
Recently
I read a comment on a thread of blog haters about me saying it's so bizarre that I still am reminiscing on my wedding...
Not exact matches
Slack recently added
threaded conversations that work like a
comment on an article like the one you're
reading now, and people seem to know how to do it.
Perhaps we have
read a
comment on a discussion
thread with which we disagree.
I haven't really
commented on EC topics since I bowed out 6 - 7 years ago, but my sadness over what was lost when that community withered is all coming back to me having
read this
thread.
If you
read through the
comment thread on this post you will get a taste of the length with which people have gone to protect the Emergent brand and do harm to Julie.
Having
read through the tone of several of your
comments on this
thread, I pray that the above verse encourages you that you are personally referenced in the Bible.
UPDATE # 2: I'm going to go ahead and close the
comment thread on this post because a few folks seem rather eager to prove my point there, and I'm tired of
reading and deleting this stuff.
I have just gone
on to the computer instead of my phone (where it isn't as easy to
read the
comments thread) and have now
read the earlier
comment on the weight of sweet potatoes being 600g.
His daughter is adorable and of course I had to
comment on that, but as I
read through the
thread I realized that sour green mango sprinkled in salt was a Thing.
Reading the
thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the
comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.
that's what it sounds like if you
read comments here, and it makes me laugh because I've seen nearly identical
threads about the same people
on other team's sites.
I was feeling really blue until I
read the
comments in this
thread and it is putting a smile
on my face.
There are lots of sensible
comments by Gooners
on various
threads but only those which actively call for Wengers sacking are worth
reading and actually helpful in increasing the pressure
on the club to act and sack him.
I'm not meaning to cause any more of a ruckus here, but I've
read a lot of
comments on this
thread which frankly refer to women who choose not to homebirth as ignorant.
If you
read some of the other
comments on this
thread, it isn't uncommon for dad to sleep in a separate bed or room.
I hope David Cameron or someone
on his team
reads this
comment thread.
Read the
thread of
comments below her post for info
on Shakeology related to heart palpitations.
I
read on one of the
threads here about a poster
commenting on a hydrogen breath test... are those fairly reliable?
Hi Shantess, I've been doing a lot of
reading on PCOS and found this
thread and your
comment.
I would recommend
reading through the
comment threads on this.
Stunning as always!!!! I've
read through the links and through the
comments thread, unless I missed it, I was wondering about the wreath
on Maddy's headboard, it looks like felt stones??? Very cool!
Read through their profile, look at their pictures, find a shared point of interest or a common
thread, and send them a message
commenting on it.
You can upload audio, photos, and videos, search through profiles, create Favorites and Friends lists, receive match recommendations, send and receive virtual flirts,
read forum posts, and post your own
threads and
comments — we could go
on and
on.
the good thing was, you could name a movie / tv that virtually everyone else had long forgotten about, and there the page would be, with a message board to use for it... meant you could
read other
comments / questions by people, even if there were very few
threads on the show / person because of their obscurity..
I just posted a short
comment with similar numbers (including some extrapolations
on pages / borrow
read)
on the
thread at Kboards, which will probably get shredded by all the Chicken Littles over there
So, please,
read what you write in response to a review or a
comment on a
thread and then
read it again before you even think about hitting the «enter» button.
Comment on threads, take some time to
read books written by other members and help them out where you can.
I always find it interesting
reading these
comment threads on Group vs. Bank RESPs.
Feedback is really important to us and we
read all of your
comments and discussion
threads, so come join us over
on the Swordy Steam page for more information and community discussion!
Both the Metroid II (RetroActive # 12) and Super Mario RPG (# 11) discussions included forum
comments being pulled from the relevant
threads and
read aloud
on the show, as was the case with every previous RetroActive (even for the apathy - inducing Ninja Spirit).
I posted a version of this post
on Facebook this morning, jumping up from breakfast after
reading the New York Times article, and there has been a passionate response (I've made the Facebook post public so that the
comments thread can be accessed by anyone who is
on Facebook).
> 230 To elaborate
on the link I posted — this is one of the editors of Reason Magazine, who has changed his mind about warming; the
thread below his posting includes
comments from some people who
read only his posting, some who
read the press release, and one or two who actually
read the science
on which he based his change of mind.
(Apologies, just realised with changing pages to create an account, I ended up posting
on the Antarctic
comment thread rather than the Arctic
thread I was
reading.
There is no question that there are now two polarized sides (
read the
comments on the previous
thread.)
How
on earth does anyone
read Judenhass into the
comments in this
thread?
Reading Climate Cover - Up, you keep stumbling across familiar phrases and concepts, which you can see every day
on the
comment threads.
If you're as interested in the exchange between Jim and myself as you appear to be (by dint of your interjecting yourself into the dialogue), I suggest you go back to the previous Wagner
thread and
read up
on our prior exchange
on the topic related to my question in the above
comment.
After
reading through the
comment thread on the last post, and the
comment thread on the same topic at SkS, it occurs to me that the scientists that do climate research — as well as their sycophants — do not see this as self - evident the way most commenters do here.
There are plenty of great JC quotes in the
thread too, worth
reading just for those - she has a
comment on critical thinking and ends with:
I am not sure if you
read the Reviewers
comments and the
comments on the
thread.
I have
read all the
comments that have been presented
on this
thread as well as other
threads.
Go back and
read comment threads here
on the Hay paper, which is now looking to be pretty good science.
And now you insult by implying I would write
comments on someones blog without
reading the OP, which is what it looks like you've done here, since you are diluting the
thread with irrelevant off - topic provocations.
Not the best place for this link I know but given that peopel will be
reading this
thread as I am having come here from WUWT, may I draw your attention to the folowing
comment I've posted
on DITC that concerns PSU ESSC.
Klapper: if you haven't already seen it, I suggest you
read the
comment here, posted
on another
thread.
There are two
comments, however, I'd like to make after
reading the posts
on this
thread.
I
read Anthony's latest
comment (in his second
comment thread)
on how the data collection was done and I agree with his general premise that corrections for TOBS might no be as revealing as some imagine.
If you
read my
comments on the previous
threads, I was surprised to hear that Judith said that ACO2 doesn't «dominate» (let alone «influence») the climate
on decadal or even centenial scale.
The «Share» command in Safari makes it easy to email links to posts
on WUWT to friends and relatives, but I know most don't have the time to spend studying long, often intricate arguments, and references to people they never heard of, not to mention
reading lengthy
Comments threads.