Sentences with phrase «read much science»

KUEHN: I don't read much science fiction, but one of my favorites I read this year was Parker Peevyhouse's upcoming debut, Where Futures End.

I've read much science fiction where the old gods, and even some current ones, feature as characters.

Not exact matches

If you've been reading much education or business news, you probably know there's a lot of buzz around STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) education and degrees these days.

Gross says focusing on video games was as much about the science of tracking and collecting information about patients» vision, as it is about the psychology in having a testing format that appeals to a wide range of ages and cognitive abilities — from children through elderly — regardless of reading or language skills.

The first is just the observation that I bought what amounts to a 1.5 million dollar laptop screen with bitcoin back when it was a newfangled science project, much like the million dollar pizzas one reads about on the web.

To ignore these principles of interpretation is to distort the text just as much as if you ignored the principle of reading poetry as poetry with all the rich meaning of figurative language and chose rather to read it like it was a science text book.

I've read quite a bit thank you very much, but NOWHERE in science is God challenged.

Science has proven pretty much all of it to be false and the book itself contradicts itself more so than the hypocrites who read it.

His reading revealed that the field to which these works are assigned — variously designated «practical theology,» «church studies,» or «ministry studies» — is very diverse and imports much from the human sciences.

I soon realized after reading much of the science and research (I am a Computer Science Grad) that science theorizes and tries to disprove god but very intelligent people know that science does not disprove god and that evolution has lots of unanswered questions as well as the biscience and research (I am a Computer Science Grad) that science theorizes and tries to disprove god but very intelligent people know that science does not disprove god and that evolution has lots of unanswered questions as well as the biScience Grad) that science theorizes and tries to disprove god but very intelligent people know that science does not disprove god and that evolution has lots of unanswered questions as well as the biscience theorizes and tries to disprove god but very intelligent people know that science does not disprove god and that evolution has lots of unanswered questions as well as the biscience does not disprove god and that evolution has lots of unanswered questions as well as the big bang.

Oh, Muneef, how much you have missed by not reading up on science!

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result

Those accustomed to reading analysis of faith - based reforms by sociologists, theologians and social workers can learn much from the political science perspective.

Read the «Case for Christ», «Mere Christianity», and research what apologetics is, you may be surprised how much that science proves God's Existence.

Rick Perry may truly be a religious man, but I keep reading between the lines that he is a man who has demonstrated that he can be bought for the right price, does not care much about the environment, people except for the upper class, and who shuns science in favor of the party line and cash in pocket.

And they will know we are Christians by our Love...... the HATE and FEAR I read and hear so much of by people who think they have it RIGHT, the right God, the right skin color, the right country, the right religion, even ther right definitions, the right science, the right proof, all the while telling all others they have it WRONG is the scariest stuff on this planet Earth.

I'll say it again, then... They will know we are Christians by our Love...... the HATE and FEAR I read and hear so much of by people who think they have it RIGHT, the right God, the right skin color, the right country, the right religion, even ther right definitions, the right science, the right proof, all the while telling all others they have it WRONG is the scariest stuff on this planet Earth.

I pretty much read about advances in brain science and not wonder.

If I were choosing recent books in this area which most deserve to be read outside the country, I would start with Oliver O'Donovan's political theology in The Desire of the Nations; John Milbank's critique of the social sciences in Theology and Social Theory; Timothy Gorringe's provocative political reading of Karl Barth in Karl Barth: Against Hegemony; Peter Sedgwick's The Market Economy and Christian Ethics; Michael Banner's Christian Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problems; Duncan Forrester's Christian Justice and Public Policy; and Timothy Jenkins's Religion in Everyday Life: An Ethnographic Approach, which argues with a dense interweaving of theory and empirical study for a social anthropological approach to English religion which has learned much from theology.

Those who have read the book know that Tickle goes into much greater detail about the questions and challenges raised by cognitive science, literary deconstruction, higher criticism, Freud, Jung, Campbell, Einstein, Heisenbuerg, and many other philosophical / scientific / cultural movements.

I love reading about the science of baking and learning how it works as much as I enjoy the process, so the ratios of starches, gums, and proteins was particularly interesting.

I don't comment often but do read daily — this blog has taught me so much about critical thinking, feminism, science, and respect.

Not only does a fluent reader make the transition to being a fluent writer much more easily than a non-fluent reader, but as students get older reading plays an important role in math, science, and social studies, too.

So don't spend much time reading science blogs and if you do, make sure you read the following 17 science blogs.

Every day, I read and learn new things in a much broader area of science than I have ever had the time to do before.

«It's so much fun for me to read the science, and think about how it can be presented more clearly.»

And «working with kids on science - text reading, in science class, is much more successful» than trying to do it in language arts classes, she says.

But its chances of getting read, being picked up by the press, or enlightening and inspiring anyone are much slimmer than those of a well - written one, says Phillip Shewe, chief science writer at the American Institute of Physics.

The experiment is a much more practical version of a study Boehme and colleagues published in Science in 2010, when they were able to read nuclear spins from phosphorus atoms in a conventional silicon semiconductor.

Even if his arguments might have been refined, there is much in the book that needed to be said, and much that can be read with profit, especially about science education in Pakistan.

Gingrich has written so much and spoken so often that it is possible to confuse the volume of his pronouncements with their frequency, but some of his ideas appear to come straight from the science fiction he has read.

DiChristina: I was just going to say, that's one thing also what occurred to me is that to me is a lesson in microcosm — because it's just a paragraph what Steve just read to everybody — that shows why it's so important in science to remove all your confounds, you know, remove all the variables so that you can find really what is at the heart of thing, and to me that that's the lesson that science has much more thoroughly adopted probably at this point and can speak with, you know, much greater authority; when something actually is a finding you need to be able to remove all the potential things that could be interfering with the conclusion that you're trying to make.

So much so that it became routine for me and my brother (see below) to watch at least one documentary a day and read books about several topics in natural sciences.

So, I would encourage any students out there who are interested in any science to read broadly, and to learn as much math as you can.

It is the first cookbook I've read that isn't just recipe based but that offers a blueprint (and specific help) for learning languages, the science of cooking, survival cooking and living, rapid memorization and so much more.

Read this well - researched book just once and you'll forever understand the science behind garlic's infection - fighting powers, how much you need to take, the best ways to enjoy it and how to avoid «odor issues.»

It is no wonder then that lay people trying to learn about colloidal silver become confused and have a hard time understanding the science involved with the subject matter when so much of what they read is scientifically flawed.

I'm new to keto but everything I've read, and the science behind it just makes so much sense.

I read this post and it just seems like way to much for a person without a science or medical background to understand and implement on their own.

After doing so much research, reading Paul Jaminet's work on the «dangers of low - carb», and Lara Briden's work, she's got an article called «Your hormones need dinner», and countless others explain the science on why low carb is dangerous for our thyroid and our adrenals.

If you were one of THOSE who actually paid attention in science classes and read the optional material, then you will probably find much fault in the details.

If you think I might be reading too much into this childish piffle, consider that any film which casts Garry Marshall, of all people, as a weaselly Harlan Ellison (or, more accurately and «subtly,» a weaselly science - fiction writer named «Donald Harlan») obviously has something on its mind.

The OECD said that there was «much to be positive about», including: levels of reading and science above international averages; a high level of social inclusion; a drop in teenage smoking and alcohol consumption; and a large majority (nine in ten) of students who feel positive about their school and teachers.

The OECD says students in Australia — along with those in New Zealand, Japan, Korea and the United States — performed much better in this assessment than would be expected, based on their scores in the PISA 2015 science, reading and mathematics tests.

Its major finding was that most parents actually want pretty much the same things from their schools: a solid core curriculum in reading and math, an emphasis on science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education, and the development in students of good study habits, strong critical thinking skills, and excellent verbal and written communication skills.

And, according to international comparative tests (PISA — Programme for International Student Assessment, PIRLS — Progress in International Reading Literacy Study, and TIMMS — Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study), «children with at least two years of preschool achieve much higher scores at age 15 than those who attend no preschool or only one year».

David Grissmer and his colleagues are producing a series of studies that suggest how much later success in math, reading, and science depend on early acquisition of the kind of «general knowledge» and fine - motor skills learned through art and other subjects.

Throughout the day we teach our children much math, science, reading etc..

James Bowen, director of NAHT Edge, said: «It's important for all children to experience positive male role models, and to understand that men can be interested in education, science or reading, just as much as in football.

The United Kingdom, by contrast, was ranked 27th among nations, despite performing much better in reading and science.