Sentences with phrase «read my post above»

I wanted to make this point for readers that make less money because if I read the post above and made $ 60K per year, I'd find it kind of discouraging.

Once you read the post above you'll have a better understanding of PR vs TBPR.

It said 2 - 3 days... but after reading the posts above, it appears you can only have one currency in your wallet at a time.

Read my post above junior.

Please read my post above too for more details in regard to this.

You didn't read my post above.

Rainer B. Another thing if you read the post above before your post taking the link of the stories of the prophets you will understand what was the true message from the time of Adam to the time of the seal of prophets Muhammed (pbuh)... believing in same will solve all the issues of misunderstandings between all previous religions with the Quran..

If you try it, be sure to read the post above for some tips.

Since you have clearly read my post above and as I am not going to change my opinion, I have to say to you that we both hope I AM RIGHT BUT ONLY ONE OF US BELIEVES I WILL BE.

Jeremy, Please read my post above saying the same as you and about the key understanding of what positivity actually IS.

I read the posts above and one overwhelming thought came to my mind.

I just read you post above mine.

Sorry, just read the post above - Redwood is a good big ideas man, but he can tend to be evangelical about them and can be difficult to handle.

If you read the post above about where to invest, you can see that commission vary widely, and there are often specials or promotions you can take advantage of.

The Orchard card is good for a single - card strategy, but if you read the post above (and the comments) you can do much better than this with multiple cards (even just two.)

And I say this after reading the post above by ZombieGamerMan wherein he called me moronic and dumb in the same post.

U bern reading my posts above?

Read my posting above.

If you read my posting above at 15:22:18, you'll see that I now interpret him as saying there are simply long cycles (PDO) driven by shorter ones (ENSO).

Please read the post above from David L Hagen which quotes my words.

[Response: Roger, How can you read the post above and claim that we're avoiding forecast verification altogether?

You ask «How can you read the post above and claim that we're avoiding forecast verification altogether?»

@Caleb Heimsoth, @Alexander Felice, @James Wise, @Jay Hinrichs, @Ali Boone - please read my post above.

Not exact matches

As I wearily got my Washington Post from the stoop early this AM — yes, some of us still read the «broadsheets» — I was bemused to see this crazy article, front page, above the fold.

In case you missed our initial explanation for swing trade entry into this bullish ETF, we suggest reviewing those two posts above, then read the next paragraph, which details last week's exit strategy.

Please have a close read of the blog post above, in particular, the following paragraphs:

Got a wee shock reading the above post — thought it said Prodigal Prophet's DAUGHTER!!!

After my post last night got me reading Budget 1980 and the National Energy Program, I stumbled upon something completely fascinating: the hated National Energy Program proposed an indexed price for synthetic crude from oil sands projects which, had it been followed until today, would have been above the Canadian dollar price of WTI in -LSB-...]

As for the atheists and «mega» Christians posting, read the above and apply it to yourselves.

I hope that all of you here have taken a moment to read what I posted above.

Just as a point of clarification to Bill's post above, while I welcome what I thinkis a imporant point we should al keep in mind I would in no way ever see myself as an important part of the conversation more a present somewhat comenting bystander although my ego was very flattered when I read Bill's comment

If you read the post I linked above, it will answer some of your questions.

If you read some sort of endorsement of homosexuality in the post above, you might want to go read the post again and point it out to me.

Having read most, if not all of the posts Jeremy has written that directly or as an aside discuss Calvinism, I am certain that most or all of what you are stating in the above comment is not what Jeremy is saying.

However, if you'd read my initial posting above, I am discussing a hypothetical whereby religion has already gone the way of the dodo, and that it would be a shame if all the beautiful architecture were to not find a new use.

As a follow - up to my post above, I just read the following in a book today which sums up nicely some of my concerns with Way of the Master Evangelism:

Because this isn't the case and as you said, religions are creations of man, it just irks me to read posts like we see above where someone suggests their way is the «only» way.

If you are still feeling a nagging sense of incompleteness after hitting all of the above, just accuse them of lying (no need to actually explain what the «lie» was, you did nt read the post anyway.

Jeremy, I'll make you a deal — just delete the rant above and I'll post what my first thoughts were when I read your post — and congrats, you are one that should be consulted, I have come to believe.

Maani, you need to improve your «reading between the lines» act as there was not a bit of anger in my post above.

I read through several other blog posts on the blog that this one came from, and found that every single one of them was just like the one above.

From all the posts I have read above it seems to me we all have been in the same boat of not knowing what we are born into when we are born again.

You may notice a literal translation of the Hebrew posted above, perhaps you should have read the exchange before leaping to conclusions.

I did not read any sarcasm or judgment in my post, or in those of the comments above.

Please read the rest of my posts above.

Read the long post by Dyslexic doG above.

If people can't understand what you're trying to say they will a) not read your post; b) think you're an idiot; c) reject what you're trying to say, either because they misunderstand or because they automatically reject the opinions of idiots; or d) all of the above.

I was ready to post this message to Greg when I read your above post.

Did you read the quote I posted above from that article?!

I have read all of the above posts, and I honestly think most of them are «much ado about nothing.»