Not exact matches
Mozilla has also integrated the popular app Pocket, lets people save web content for later
readings and
viewings,
into the new Firefox Quantum.
Reading Transformational Technology Alert gives you a unique and compelling
view into what the world of tomorrow may look like.
My
view on the rest of the year is the same: GDP drops to O % in 3Q, the goes back
into contraction -LSB-...]
Read the rest of this entry»
Canadian and Alberta voters need to understand that every time you get annoyed at Justin Trudeau and the way he manages the country all you need to do is listen to the radio and Charles Adler rant about him or
read articles by Lorne Gunter and Rick Bell from the Edmonton Sun (who formerly worked at the Alberta Report, and helped Ted Byfield run the Alberta Report
into the ditch, or
read anything written by Colby Cosh or Ezra Levant and soon you will realize the propaganda and hate these clowns spread about their own political / religious
views trying to scare the general population to their side or
views.
Every time I get annoyed at Justin Trudeau and the way he manages the country all I do is listen to the radio and Charles Adler rant about him or
read articles by Lorne Gunter and Rick Bell from the Edmonton Sun (who formerly worked at the Alberta Report, and helped Ted Byfield run the Alberta Report
into the ditch, or
read anything written by Colby Cosh or Ezra Levant and soon I realize the propaganda and hate these clowns try and spread about their own political / religious
views I revert back to supporting the more liberal viewpoint).
Well beyond clicks and
views, this taxonomy - driven tool delivered real insights
into which content pieces were (and weren't) being
read, shared, commented on, shared again and so on.
At his blog 500 Hats (one of the most -
read blogs by venture capitalists, according to the Wall Street Journal), he provides an inside
view into the world of venture capitalism and angel investing.
Sorry man... but there is simply no way to back up these
views biblically without
reading into the text.
Protestants should, from this point of
view,
read it to be led
into an otherwise often closed but nonetheless decisive discussion by a guide who is himself not Catholic but who knows the history and is sympathetic to the problems and proffered solutions.
Oh and I shouldn't have
read into your post that you were a Calvinist... but I know determinism is a Calvinistic
view... I should have used «determinism».
In seminary we were warned of the dangers of eisegesis (
reading your own
views into the text).
This
view seems to be a case of desperately
reading one's theology
into a text in order to force it to say what you want.
I don't want to see anything swept under any rugs — I feel like anyone accusing me of this must be mis -
reading me — either willfully, or because you've become so swept up
into one way of
reading this online discourse, that you feel any divergent
view must be swiftly — and shrilly — dispatched.
Now it is true that certain Biblical passages were used to support this
view, but this was largely because the doctrine was
read into them, an easy temptation to fall
into at any time.
But since then I've been drawn back again and again by her unique point of
view, as exhibited in posts like «Growing
Into Authority,» «10 Reasons Rural Ministry is Great,» and «The Reality of Rural Poverty,» I've even been
reading her series on Reformed Theology!
All this is to say that Wendy is not yet convinced of my
view, but wants me to incorporate an alternative
view (which I shared with her a few months ago but have not ever
read anywhere else)
into this new
view.
I share all this to show how misguided it is to
read the classical
view of divine foreknowledge
into Peter's denial.
Regrettably, she does little more than provide us with a reminder of a textbook example of eisegesis (
reading «
into» the biblical text one's own ideology) rather than exegesis (
reading «out of» Scripture with attentiveness to historical and literary context, even if it conflicts with one's own personal
views).
It is hazardous to
read autobiography
into fiction, but in this case we can be sure we have Singer's own
view.
J.I. Packer probably is a good representation of the historic
view: «Reference to a second blessing has to be
read into the [biblical] text; it can not be
read out of it.»
«If he expressed no
view I don't think anybody is of right to interpret and
read the mind of the person... we do not have a window
into people's soul.
In other words, J. Denny Weaver's approach in this book is that he
read a bunch of books on the atonement, and then wrote 5 - 10 pages summarizing the
views and arguments of each book, which are then all compiled
into this book on the atonement.
As in most examples of allegorical or symbolical interpretation, the interpreter's
views are first subtly
read into the text and then adroitly extracted by a pretended exegesis.
My hope is that this post will give you a glimpse
into a more blessed way to
view scripture, no matter how mad you get while
reading it!
When i
read that i translate that
into two
views one is to be empowered the other is to be disappointed.
The imperatives that civil rights leaders (and many federal judges)
read into the decision» forced integration, mass busing, racial balance» were simply, in his
view, not there.
These three chapters alone are worth the price of the book as they provide a big - picture overview of how to
read and
view Scripture, and give us insight
into what C. S. Lewis thought about the Word of God and specifically, about the fulfillment of prophecies.
Now I would
read that to say, «I don't fit
into any of the boxes that can sum up my
views in a couple of words, so if you really want to know what my religious
views are, you can find them here: https://www.nakedpastor.com ``.
- LIE, you are
reading your prejudice
view point
into the scriptures and there are 1000's of churches and clergy that have shown that nowhere in the bible did your god discuss sexual orientation as we know and understand it today.
The direct evidence consists of what Whitehead himself tells us, first, about how his books are meant to be
read and understood, about the genesis of his ideas, and about modifications in his
views; and second, about the nature of his thinking, about his difficulties in translating his thoughts
into words, about the sources of his philosophical terminology, and about the peculiar manner in which he composed his books.
Certainly the Bible bears witness to the wonderful works of God, the signs and miracles of His grace, but it is anachronistic to
read into these affirmations a much later understanding of miracle, one which belongs particularly to the medieval
view of the interpenetration of the two worlds — the natural and supernatural.
Think of reality this way, Origen should be
read as saying, and you will be able to enter more fully
into the wisdom of the Scriptures because you will be thinking scripturally; you will approach the Bible with a biblical
view of reality.
I think the discrepancy lies in the fact that theology is the remaking of the word of God
into something academic — which is, of course, the antithesis of
reading with a
view to do.
Kuhn reaches the point of recognizing the gospels as kerygma, i.e. as proclamations of Jesus the Messiah in his significance for faith; but whereas the later Protestant
view was that the kerygmatic element was in the service of a post-Easter
view of Jesus as risen Lord,
read back
into the narratives by the later community, Kuhn's
view is that this element was present in the tradition from the very beginning, part of the gospel before the gospels, part of the message of the apostles from the very first days, part of the very fabric of the ministry of Jesus itself.
His
views about women are very well known so it is hardly surprising to see him
read them
into the Esther story as he has clearly done here.
We get so comfortable with a particular
view of a text,
reading the text from a different perspective jars us
into giving the text another look.
Media is happy to paint what - ever picture will get the most
views and the WengerOut / WengerIn debate is like turning lead
into gold for them, they will keep using it to get people
reading and happy to perpetuate misinformation for the continued
views.
We are trying to
read into quotations from Laca's
view on EPL to French media.
It's also worth noting that Search results on Folksy take
into account the sub-categories and categories that items are listed in, as does the recently released «similar items»
view —
read more here.
Bullshit — if some people have a bizarrely distorted
view of him, it matters, and the best thing to do is drag it out
into the light, regardless of whether or not it makes people who think that way feel stupid or talked - down - to — and a magazine editor is not really responsible for the feelings of people who don't
read his publication.
Yes, Milton would, I suspect, agree with your point - of -
view, but it is interesting how 400 years after Milton's birth how so many wish to
read into Milton modern interpretations that gloss over his actual
view.
While warning against the
reading of politics
into the issue, he also said the development should not be
viewed as a reflection of the relationship between the Executive and the Legislature.
Listening to this week, and
reading Labour Party member Rod Liddles article today, he may gave not gone around the changes the right way, but he was trying to do the thing, the way Blair would have done, and his
views weren't that different to Ruth Kelly, Alan milburn, or Charles Clarke, it was only Ed balls ho caved
into the NUT as was derided, by Jack straw and Alan Johnson.
In this
view, every particle in your body, every speck of light that lets you
read these words, and every packet of gravity that pushes you
into your chair is just a variant of this one fundamental entity.
«From a strategic point of
view, we now have a good tool to look
into people's brains — and we have a biological
read out.»
Until recently, she directed the SETI (Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) Institute in Mountain
View, Calif. «We
read these ancient texts, and the ancient Greeks, the Romans, the Chinese — they were all wondering how we humans fit
into the universe.»
For the combination of data from different technologies, we merged their aligned
reads into one BAM file (after base quality recalibration with GATK) and called the variants using samtools mpileup applying - AB, disabling Illumina - specific probabilistic realignment (samtools mpileup — R — I — A — B — q 1 — Q $ Q — r $ chrom — ugf $ REF $ BAM bcftools
view — vcgNI - vcfutils.pl varFilter > result.vcf).
It would seem like an old myth to
read that even as late as the 1920s doctors were recommending milk for the treatment of many diseases, and that milk has been
viewed as a healthful food far back
into antiquity.
I am a retired biology professor emeritus who developed a class: «The Biology of Obesity, Ageing and Disease» and would definitely add all of Dr. Fungs articles and videos
into the curriculum as required
reading and
viewing.
And here's the
view from the couch, peeking
into our kitchen and hearth room (where I do most of my late night
reading).