Sentences with phrase «read ur views n»

Oh ho nice to read ur views n ideas abt life.pray to god may ur journey of life keep going happily n lively as always.Best wishes, love n blessings.

Not exact matches

He is not attending on behalf of Facebook or to represent our views,» read a company statement per Recode.

I always read the deck before the meeting but if I get it 12 hours in advance I certainly don't have time to do analysis, formulate views, check on facts and so forth and therefore I'm less prepared to add value when I arrive.

In our view, the result of reading all three papers and others like them leads to a conclusion: we do not know the answers to the major problems the authors raise.

I do not view reading as a leisure activity.

Civil rights groups reportedly delivered petitions to Google's Mountain View headquarters earlier this week urging the company to withdraw sponsorship from the Republican National Convention and flew a plane overhead with a banner reading, «Google: Don't Be Evil.

Its colors are pleasing (but can be adjusted if needed), it can get nicely bright, it's easy to read outside, and it doesn't wash out when you view it from an angle.

Often people don't fully read the articles, completely view the videos or even glance at the images they retweet.

Similar to the «hate - watching» experience of viewing television programmes you don't like because you enjoy mocking them, this can be seen as a mild form of «hate - reading».

And Dave Young from Cooley who read a draft and made sure I wasn't completely off base in my views.

The question as I read the post is that you can't look at a month in the rear view mirror or you'll go nuts!

And FWIW, if you haven't read The Great Rebalancing yet, it might change the way you view things at the moment — I know it did wonders for my understanding, althoguh I keep forgetting important parts of it and have to relearn them by reading Michael's (unfortunately infrequently) blog posts.

«Given that tax obligations for digital financial assets and associated investments are not included in the law..., the government views as essential the need to make corresponding changes... regarding taxation and collection,» the summary reads.

If you don't see a Table of Contents to the left, click here to view that series, where you'll get more value than reading just this post.]

If you don't see a Table of Contents to the left, click here to view the series, where you'll get more value than reading just this post.]

If you don't see a Table of Contents to the left, click to view the SIDCHA series, the burpee series, and the cold shower series where you'll get more value than reading just this post.]

Last year I wrote on Suven Life Sciences, also I did some secondary level maths to get a sense of returns an investor could get buying the business at then market cap (~ 2000 INR Crores or 400 Million USD) and exiting in 2024 See Snap shot below The base case CAGR didn't excite but reading management commentary compelled me to take a tracking position in model portfolio Over to this year One thing in AR gave me a Jeff Bezos moment For the first time management was sounding optimistic (this is coming from a management which is very conservative on record) Emphasis mine Management views on past Despite having grown the business every single year across the last five years, our business sustainability has been consistently questioned.

I have read about annuities, from a very limited skim view, but do not trust any of them, with one exception.

If you've been reading these weekly missives for any length of time you won't be surprised to learn that I don't hew to the secular view.

Well beyond clicks and views, this taxonomy - driven tool delivered real insights into which content pieces were (and weren't) being read, shared, commented on, shared again and so on.

But in a week of coverage, much of which is sure to be either generically retrospective or gleefully judgmental (a Reuters article I came across yesterday made sure to note, in its final paragraph, that his papacy had been «besieged» by the sexual abuse crisis — a claim which, aside from its mild bias, is not exactly accurate), it's refreshing to read a piece that takes a longer view.

Protestants should, from this point of view, read it to be led into an otherwise often closed but nonetheless decisive discussion by a guide who is himself not Catholic but who knows the history and is sympathetic to the problems and proffered solutions.

sacraments — true you probably don't need a church for them — baptism is commanded (for believers), it's special, but not neccesssarily a sacrament, it can be done by any believer, although possibly it was only the apostles who baptized (I tend to go with the baptist view on baptism, because that's what I read in the Bible.

Oh and I shouldn't have read into your post that you were a Calvinist... but I know determinism is a Calvinistic view... I should have used «determinism».

I suppose you can't have reading comprehension if you don't actually read anything, but if you would like to correct your world view try googling «purple triangle».

Everything that is said on these blogs is viewed as an attack, can you not read?

Reading breathless media reports about CO2 «pollution» and about minimizing our carbon footprints, one might think that the earth can not have too little CO2, as Simpson thought one couldn't be too thin — a view which was also overstated, as we have seen from the sad effects of anorexia in so many young women.

Sarah, I think maybe you have not read many posts on my blog, and have jumped to conclusions about how I view church and church - going Christians.

People need not only to read widely at an early age, but to get out and meet people with differing views.

If the Bible's biggest fans don't even care enough to read it, then why should its critics view it as a relevant book?

In any case, keep up the good work and although I still don't get the Trinity (read as «believe» it) I know from our past exchanges this does not stop you from viewing me as your brother.

I don't want to see anything swept under any rugs — I feel like anyone accusing me of this must be mis - reading me — either willfully, or because you've become so swept up into one way of reading this online discourse, that you feel any divergent view must be swiftly — and shrilly — dispatched.

In this view, Ephesians 2:8 could be read this way: «For by grace you have been saved through faith, and it is especially not of yourselves, it is especially the gift of God.»

New readings are offered in place of conventional or accepted ones, not with the view that they necessarily correspond more adequately to the reality in question in toto, but that they are a discovery / creation of some aspect of that reality overlooked in other readings, or one especially pertinent to the times, etc..

For to Jews the Holocaust is not an event to read about in a few books, or to remember on a few special occasions; it is for them to confront, to agonize over, to reject and resist, to search deeply and widely for a glimmer of hope - all this with a view to a Jewish self - understanding, of which an essential part is being heir of the murdered millions, the remnant of the catastrophe.

I never appreciated his use of gratuitous nude pictures he used earlier on to increase his numbers... but I saw it for what it was... I can also see why my husband and I'm sure others, would be offended by what they see & read here if this is not their view of church & religion.

We do not read it, or any other texts, as a literal instruction manual for life, but rather as a living, breathing text which we can view with fresh eyes each time we open it.

The presentation supposes that it is theological views that at least trigger developments in the other areas, which is understandable in a book that proposes a theological reading, not a sociological analysis, of developments in marriage customs.

Christian Smith shows convincingly that the goals and claims of biblicism have not worked, and so it is an impossible way of viewing and reading Scripture.

He said that while his wife was reading a New York Times piece about the controversy at Princeton over Singer, «she looked up and said, «These are the same views as you have — why aren't they picketing your classes?»

Haven't you ever read something or viewed something and had one opinion on what it said to you, yet someone else has a different opinion?

All this is to say that Wendy is not yet convinced of my view, but wants me to incorporate an alternative view (which I shared with her a few months ago but have not ever read anywhere else) into this new view.

I haven't really seen where Neal thinks the nation should run off his own views but there are some reading challenged commentors on here that don't seem to get that.

I'm intrigued, but not enough let to want to read long article about what I view is a very dubious claim.

The Bible can be taken literally or figuratively by anyone who reads it, and it need not be, and is usually not, viewed consistently.

Hop down off your cross and read a book... no not THAT book but one that will expand your mind and views not restrict them.

No, this view of Scripture doesn't help, because if Scripture is read in such a light, we are nowhere nearer to the «true truth» than we were before we read a single word.

The standard reading list given was probably giving one particular perspective (with some valid insights), but in order to counterbalance that with an evangelical view they'd have to double their workload as that material was probably not on the set reading list.»

Sometimes they say things that are not clearly enough distinguishable from this, as when Thomas speaks of the perfections of all things as being in God, 32 but there is really no warrant for reading him as holding the absurd view that God actualizes every possibility.

So, no, your views are not heretical, except to those, like fishon (read — Pharisees) who think they KNOW, but can't see that they only BELIEVE.