Sentences with phrase «read without the bias»

If any christians had a decent argument, they'd focus on it, instead of on the imagined «hate» and «spite» they seem to see in everyone who doesn't agree with them — but not in god, who demonstrates it in every book of his «word» if you but only read without the bias of indoctrination / brainwashing.

And if you've read this without any bias, and you would like a response to your woman comment, let me know.

What comes across if you read this without bias is how the pro-neuter posters are very reactionary and have a really hard time listening.

Not exact matches

We think that if we can just have a perfect, seamless book that can be read objectively and without bias, we will have the ultimate weapon.

You can't read a politically biased blog and form your opinions without actually checking sources and doing a little homework.

The bible's full of them, and you'll see them if you read the bible without bias and with as much scrutiny as you would read the Koran or other holy book..

While instructing us budding teachers in training to teach without bias, my education program wanted for us to understand the contexts of the predominantly... Continue reading Rethinking Cultural Responsivity →

And as a matter of FYI, I ran this article past someone who was a reporter for both newspaper and TV, to see if it was accidentally biased for or against self - publishers or trad publishers, which it was never meant to be and as I suspected, this person said that it wasn't and that anyone who read it objectively without any prior personal agenda would see this.

While I have potential Beta Readers among friends, family, and my Writer's Group (and anyone here willing to take up the cause), where do I find a complete strangers to read without personal bias?

I tend to agree — granted, a family member may give a biased review, but if the trolls who are out there who slam books for the sake of slamming them (without reading the books in many cases), then family members and friends should be allowed.

I've read the science, including Hansen's papers on GCM's (since I have a decade and a half professionally supporting models and simulators), and found it chock full of bias, so I decided to get the surface records and look at them myself (over 122 million records), so your dismissal is without merit.

But it's clear to anyone who's read the book without bias that the primary factor was climate change.

The reasons could just as easily be read as saying an arbitrator can not act as an advocate in other similar cases without running a risk of being accused of bias.

Please read my comment again, this time without bias.