Learn how to write an unforgettable opening by
reading our data scientist cover letter example.
Not exact matches
It's impossible to put down and impossible to
read without being moved and vicariously enraged,» says
data scientist Cathy O'Neil.
The Brain can
read a thousand articles a minute, says Dean Rootenberg, DDIQ's chief
data scientist.
fin, just saw your comment from 12/3 and I would respond with a news quote I
read recently «one in seven UK based
scientists or doctors has witnessed colleagues Intentionally altering or fabricating
data during their research or for the purposes of publication» British Medical Journal, Britain.
Anyone who doesn't realize that the authorship is honorary — that is, almost everyone who
reads the paper — will wrongly assume that this well - known
scientist has performed his or her role in ensuring the integrity of the
data.
As part of an ongoing joint project between UAH, NOAA and NASA, Christy and Dr. Roy Spencer, an ESSC principal
scientist, use
data gathered by advanced microwave sounding units on NOAA and NASA satellites to get accurate temperature
readings for almost all regions of the Earth.
«My working theory is that perhaps shorter paper titles are easier to
read and easier to understand,» thus attracting wider audiences and increasing the likelihood of a citation, says lead author Adrian Letchford, a
data scientist at the University of Warwick in Coventry, U.K.
The new method uses strands of DNA to store the
data in a way that
scientists can then
read.
Now, it is apparent from
reading even the first few pages of The Skeptical Environmentalist that Lomborg proposes to make the case that not just environmentalists, but a considerable part of the heretofore respectable environmental - science community, have been misunderstanding the relevant concepts, misrepresenting the relevant facts, understating the uncertainties, selecting
data, and failing to acknowledge errors after these have been pointed out in other words, that the
scientist contributors to what he calls «the environmental litany» (namely, that environmental problems are serious and becoming, in many instances more so) have been guilty of massively violating the
scientists code of conduct.
Data - quality issues, including the reanalysis and reprocessing of past observations, have become a topic in its own right in climate research, says Adrian Simmons, a senior
scientist at the European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts in
Reading, UK, and chairman of the GCOS steering committee.
MAUNA KEA, HI — A detailed study of the motions of different stellar populations in Andromeda galaxy by UC Santa Cruz
scientists using W. M. Keck Observatory
data has found striking differences...
Read more»
At some point,
scientists might be able to save space by not storing sequences in full, similar to the way
data is managed in particle physics, where information is
read and filtered while it is generated.
The electron spin, which is less resilient to electromagnetic stimulation than the nuclear spin, was used as a processing qubit that the
scientists used to
read and write
data.
I wish every nutrition
scientist would
read this and start realizing that there is 50 % of the world, that like the ocean, is mostly uncharted territory as far as experiments and
data go.
In this web focus we present opinion pieces, along with research and overview articles that explore the dynamic processes that... «Love his canine back - up
data collector»:
Scientist's interview about revolutionary tsunami sensor he has created is completely
Read More...
eSpark Learning's team of
data scientists used MAP
data to diagnose student skill levels and differentiate math and
reading instruction at scale throughout Piedmont Elementary School.
Through a series of weekly WERMShops, students meet local
scientists,
read scientific journals, explore local natural areas and practice
data - collection methods using GPS and GIS.
I have lately
read some comments from the NAS panel that some of the climate
scientists there agree that it is not possible to make very good statistics on the temperature
data from 2000 years ago and further... What about that?
as compared to being a real
scientist getting a mediocre salary, having to write scientific books your wife wouldn't even
read, having to gather
data and samples in the too hot, or too cold, field, and doing experiments in a warm, smelly laboratory on unobtanium, where you could accidentally set your tie on fire with a bunsen burner, well, which one would you choose?.
Any reader — even without technical or information - systems background — is invited to click on the link in my post above and see immediately with his or her own eyes that HARRY
READ ME is a three - year diary involving a very wide range of activities, transactions and programs involving more than a dozen countries and encompassing collection and processing of major portions of the raw temperature
data which underlie more than two of the principal databases used by «climate change
scientists».
great interview Anthony (with Andrew Bolt) If you have time to do any
reading on the net check out http://kenskingdom.wordpress.com/2010/05/12/the-australian-temperature-record-part-1-queensland/ link there to part 2 NT and W A he's comparing the BOM's high quality
data (homogenised) with the raw
data and Warwick Hughes (an earth
scientist) who I hope you will meet in Canberra at http://www.warwickhughes.com/blog/ has an interesting article on Distortions being spread about Australian meteorological history
As part of an ongoing joint project between UAHuntsville, NOAA and NASA, Christy and Dr. Roy Spencer, an ESSC principal
scientist, use
data gathered by advanced microwave sounding units on NOAA and NASA satellites to get accurate temperature
readings for almost all regions on the Earth.
However the experience with land sensors is that the climate
scientists that deploy the new sensors won't intercalibrate the new devices to the previous devices prior to deployment, but deploy them in the field and go «whoops — they
read different — we need to adjust the
data».
There's nothing in the snippits of the reports which I have time to
read which indicates anything other than the
scientists accomodated all reasonable requests for
data and process as best they could.
(http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/03/30/nasa-
data-worse-than-climategate-
data/)
Reading THAT article you get the sense that NASA
scientists have indeed «admitted» that their
data are not as accurate as the Hadley Centre's.
, so please do take a fresh look at what the PSI
scientists are saying (albeit
reading past Joe Postma's «anger», which while understandable, should be left out), i.e. the core scientific arguments, backed by experimental & observational
data.
What is tragically evident from the Harry
Read Me file is the picture it gives of the CRU
scientists hopelessly at sea with the complex computer programmes they had devised to contort their
data in the approved direction, more than once expressing their own desperation at how difficult it was to get the desired results.
2) In spite of the title of this email, I'm well aware — as are those who
read this blog — that global warming alarmists have been exposed as fearmongering chicken little liars (not to mention hypocrites) for decades, but rarely has it been on a level where you actually have «
scientists» and their associates caught on paper attempting to suppress
data that is contra to their pre-desired result.
I note Gavin refers to non-climate
scientists who challenge the AGW alarmists as «citizen
scientists» perhaps he should consider the climate
scientist who are doing
data analysis as «citizen
data analysts» because frankly from what I've
read on these pages they seem to be a pretty amateurist bunch.
I think my point was (in an admittedly obscure way) that sometimes climate
scientists try to
read WAY to much into their anlalysis of uncertain
data.
If you ever
read Isaac Asimov's book Foundation, you might remember a similar episode where a character is amazed that
scientists no longer seek out new empirical
data, but just manipulate
data from previous studies.
That is the discovery made by
scientists using
data from CryoSat - 2, the European probe that has been measuring the thickness of Earth's ice sheets and glaciers since it was launched by [continue
reading...]
Reading back through the blow - by - blow account of the entire debacle does give us some fresh reasons to be mad about the whole thing — for starters, in all the hubbub over whether or not climate
scientists were amassing a global conspiracy or using «tricks» to hide
data (long, long debunked), it's worth remember that the one guy who actually committed a real crime has barely even been pursued.
Indeed, having personally
read each and every one of the emails liberated from the Climategate Research Unit at East Anglia in the UK and all the Freedom of Information emails from NASA - GISS in New York, it is clear to me some of those
scientists have violated their ethical obligations to both science and we taxpayers who fund their work by «cooking the books» to fudge and bend the
data, often beyond the breaking point.
In the wake of recent events surrounding the IPCC's inclusion of speculative
data on Himalayan glacier melting, and those surrounding the hacked climate emails, a recent editorial by New
Scientist is particular worth
reading.
A proper
reading of this material will also demonstrate that CRU did not regard its «assembly of 160 years of global thermometer
data» as «private property», as New
Scientist claims.
And their primary accomplices are the
scientists at GISS, who put the altered
data through an even more biased regimen of alterations, including intentionally replacing the dropped NOAA
readings with those of stations located in much warmer locales.
Every
scientist is set on securing the next grant and it's not unusual to
read some amazing claims on the significance or impact of a given set of
data.
As part of an ongoing joint project between UAHuntsville, NOAA and NASA, John Christy, a professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center (ESSC) at The University of Alabama in Huntsville, and Dr. Roy Spencer, an ESSC principal
scientist, use
data gathered by advanced microwave sounding units on NOAA and NASA satellites to get accurate temperature
readings for almost all regions of the Earth.
His 2012 campaign hired «predictive modeling and
data mining
scientists,» according to job advertisements, which
read: «Modeling analysts are charged with predicting the behavior of the American electorate.
«We are a team of
data scientists, engineers and marketing experts passionate about harnessing the power of AI for consumer outreach and communications,»
reads the company's website.
After
reading Kosinski and Wang's paper, three sociologists and
data scientists who spoke with Quartz questioned whether the author's assertion that gay and straight people have different faces is supported by the experiments in the paper.
Read articles about Python and R, learning
data science, interviews with
data scientists, and more.