Sentences with phrase «read your journals so»

No one will read your journals so in this case, quantity can trump quality.

Not exact matches

I recently read an article about keeping a stress journal — and it made so much sense.

That means studying charts, speaking with management (if applicable), reading trade journals or doing other background work (such as macroeconomic analysis or industry analysis) so the trader is up to speed when the trading session starts.

try picking up a scientific journal and reading it so you won't be so ignorant.

Physics - lite @ CN77 & Andrew Andrew's Quote «It's not all that pointless, see while you would never be convinced that your bronze age mythological beliefs about the creation of the universe are wrong, since I can rebut (with peer reviewed journal articles no less) any claim you make, in rather stunning detail, those who are not so well versed on the subject who read the dialogue could be swayed to the side of science.

(It is getting worse: The ACLU sued to prevent Mormons from reading from pioneer journals on the Mormon Trail because they contained religious content, parents were detained because their children had pencils that said «Jesus» on them and so on.

I didn't read entire commentaries, but only the sections on Genesis 1 - 4 from 32 different commentaries, so I figure that counts as 1 book... I also read dozens of journal articles... Click the link for this post to see the archives for the podcast episodes.

I met with spiritual directors and masters from different traditions; I prayed, meditated, contemplated, read so many books from so many streams, wrote scores of journals, all in an attempt to find some understanding and peace.

So whenever I can I get Ben to read me scientific journals.

So it was not surprising to read a new report last week in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine which found that «the industry has done everything it promised, in technical terms.

The time goes by so quickly, a baby journal can become a beautiful keepsake that you can look back on and read for years to come.

My institution does not have a subscription to that journal, so I can't read the full text.

I'm a biologist myself and I used to have access to journal articles while I was in grad school, but now that I work in industry I no longer have access, so I am essentially counting on you to do the reading for me

* I realise all of my evidence for this comes from reading the series of back - and - forth papers between Michael Johnson and David Fergusson in the Journal of Marriage and Family, so I may well be wrong.

«Less than 10 people are going to read that,» Cohen admitted to himself, because the journal is so specialized.

She also spends a lot of time reading top journals to «understand what the best publishers are expecting» and so that she can explain it to her clients.

Scientific journal editors must be able to read and understand the scientific literature in their fields, so a Ph.D. in the field of interest is required.

It was Christmas break and I couldn't go home, so I spent my time at the library reading all the journals and looking at rare books.

So far, these journals have controlled who can read them and who cannotbut maybe not for much longer.

So for those new to reading journals, welcome.

So, what, I have to read all of these journals now to keep up with NGS?

One of the best ways to manage cortisol is through stress management, so find what works for you: Walk the dog, garden, journal, read, listen to music.

So, when I read Clare Morris» article «How yoga can promote therapeutic relationships» published in The Journal of Dementia Care May / June 2015 Vol 23 No 3, I became very excited.

For those of you unfamiliar with my work, every year I read through every issue of every English - language nutrition journal in the world — so busy folks like you don't have to.

For those of you unfamiliar with my work, every year I read through every issue of every English - language nutrition journal in the world — so you don't have to.

I will keep a training journal throughout the experiment and post a report on this page every week to say how things are going so please feel free to come back and read the reports regularly.

If you have been reading my blog for a while, you've probably noticed that ever since I started doing «Digital Journal,» I have not been so good at keeping up with monthly favorites ever since.

In fact, First Reformed plays so much like old - school Schrader, you might confuse it for the work of a dutiful grad student: Once again, we get a tortured Travis Bickle voiceover (Hawke's Ernst Toller keeps a journal from which, in between hitting the sauce, he reads passages like «I know there is no hope»); here, too, is a troubled woman who needs saving (Amanda Seyfried, playing a character named Mary), and Toller's own memories of his soldier son, killed in Iraq.

«Dede has gone far beyond any expectations of an academic journal reviewer in terms of number of timely reviews completed, depth of understanding of the field of research exhibited, and a compassionate voice so necessary in mentoring emerging scholars as authors,» it read.

A wealth of archival footage (ominous dust clouds, swirling dirt storms, starving livestock, invasive grasshoppers, and so much more) and photographs, along with dramatically read letters, journals, and newspaper articles, draw viewers into the story.

It is still less likely to be read, because people are mostly skimming blogs for information, but there's been growth in the «story blog» recently, so if you have flash fiction you don't intend to send to contests or journals, it's okay to put it on your blog.

- Library Journal «The Nest ambles along so beautifully, what a pleasure to read!

Literary readers rely heavily on reviews to make their reading choices, so I would encourage hybrid / indie writers to try to secure reviews from respected review journals like Kirkus or Publishers Weekly.

So start small, build up to bigger reviewers, then run an ad in a journal that gets sent to libraries featuring your books and your excellent, credible reviews (even so, personally, I probably wouldn't do that for most of my books... simply because the readers who buy cheap books on Kindle aren't the same buyers who go to libraries to read booksSo start small, build up to bigger reviewers, then run an ad in a journal that gets sent to libraries featuring your books and your excellent, credible reviews (even so, personally, I probably wouldn't do that for most of my books... simply because the readers who buy cheap books on Kindle aren't the same buyers who go to libraries to read booksso, personally, I probably wouldn't do that for most of my books... simply because the readers who buy cheap books on Kindle aren't the same buyers who go to libraries to read books).

Full of romance, seduction, and a love so powerful it reaches beyond the grave, The Secret Language of Stones is yet another «spellbindingly haunting» (Suspense magazine), «entrancing read that will long be savored» (Library Journal, starred review).

Each editor has his or her own opinions, so be sure to carefully read each journal's submission guidelines.

Legal Those wondering how Stan Lee Media can possibly afford its long, and so far entirely unsuccessful, legal battle with Marvel and Disney may want to read this brief Wall Street Journal article about «litigation finance» — which it characterizes as the growing practice of investing in lawsuits.

So, if it can read the Adobe pdf of academic papers (from journals, etc, which should not be encrypted) does that mean that it can't render the colour graphs in colour?

That means studying charts, speaking with management (if applicable), reading trade journals or doing other background work (such as macroeconomic analysis or industry analysis) so the trader is up to speed when the trading session starts.

Thanks so much for your thoughtful comments, Linda and for reading Canine Journal!

your local pet professional whole dog journal flea and tick bathe your dog on you have to learn always so easily after you read this.

* After all, I still think scientists writing in peer - reviewed journals are obligated to read the papers they cite — this despite a rather astonishing number of examples demonstrating that the failure to do so is common (and, it seems, unlikely to negatively affect one's prospects for future publishing and funding opportunities).

written with Arnold Weinstein he focused so heavily on his «bad boy» exploits (mistakenly assuming that his readers would automatically get his seriousness); later in my small literary Journal The Reading Room he wrote «Aesthetics On My Mind.»

However, without such a compelling conceptual framework with which to interpret «Untitled 2» (its media, listed as «steel, flat screen, and youth,» are not so enlightening), I can not but read the work in heavy, metonymic terms: the TV as technology, the boy as humanity, the Wall Street Journal as hegemonic power, the nude as vulnerable body — all rather hackneyed dichotomies of the day, made ready - to - hand by the exhibition's press release.

To those interested in reading more about this, a good place to start (if I say so myself) is this paper: Mann, M.E., Cane, M.A., Zebiak, S.E., Clement, A., Volcanic and Solar Forcing of the Tropical Pacific Over the Past 1000 Years, Journal of Climate, 18, 447 - 456, 2005.

Small papers, and their not - so - well paid reporters, do not have the resources to read dozens of journals, attend scientific conferences or enjoy any of the other perks that would allow a reporter to truly stay current on a complicated topic like the environment.

So with the understanding that I sure as hell know what pervasive influence peddling can do to the process of peer review — because the pharma companies do actively recruit their «key opinion leaders» on the basis of things like editorial clout and that prominence within their specialty which gives them to hold responsibilities in peer review for «high impact» medical journals — you might appreciate why, when I got to read those e-mails in the FOI2009.zip archive last November, my immediate desire was for something brutally Sicilian to happen immediately and with spatter marks on the surrounding walls to the C.R.U. correspondents who had been concerting to infest and pervert the peer review process throughout the physical sciences wherever anything critical of the AGW hypothesis might be brought into publication.

There are some authors attached to (semi --RRB- reputable journals such as the Telegraph, and other's I may read from time to time, whose work has proven to be so scandalously poor that I have made a conscious decision never to reward them with clicks.

I see problems with: * you have to be an active promoter of yourself to get articles read * the review process (mainly there is no ability to assess why rejected articles are rejected and the time wasting because of pedantic comments) * project - based funding and treating research like consulting (if I can tell you how much a project will cost, then by definition it is not research) * since academia seems to be drifting towards consulting, researchers start to become underpaid compared to peers in consulting * the focus on the number of publications weighted by the rank of the journal * status is based on if you publish in a high - rank journal, «selected» to be a lead author, and so on, and not whether you do good and creative research, good collaborator, good colleague to peers, etc..

So it was with great pleasure that I read through the latest issue of the Journal of Experimental Biology, which is entirely dedicated to the ways in which parasites turn hosts into zombies.