My recent story, 20 Embarrassing Phrases Even Smart People Misuse, surfaced a slew of
reader comments regarding their grammatical annoyances.
Not exact matches
From the
reader messages posted in article
comment sections, housing bears appear to
regard persons associated with the housing industry as sources of BS, to use their abbreviated terminology.
If you have the capability, I would simply suggest reviewing your analytics data for referral information and just keep tabs that way (a previous post on Evaluating Link Results has a great
comment from one of the
readers regarding this — check out his idea for certain).
Over the past few months, my mailbag has overflowed with
comments, suggestions, praise and scorn from
readers regarding topics tackled in my Kids and Money columns.
In
regard to the
comment about how Herd Evans provides little guidance in this critique, I would encourage
readers not to seek step - by - step guidelines for what to do next but to exegete the situation on their own by engaging the tension through ongoing dialogue with millennials (or anyone who has become jaded with church).
Regarding the
reader comment saying roadside problems in the US would be much better than in any 3rd world country: Yeah, probably.
I noticed a lot of
readers commented on a space issue
regarding these cookies and the 4 days chilling period.
Additional
comments made by the author himself indicate virtually no knowledge of the structure of medieval European society, or of the relationship between sacred and secular learning, and include a condemnation which even
readers who are not anxious to return to the Middle Ages may
regard as rather extreme: «the suppression of scientific thought by the medieval Church represents one of the blackest periods of human history».
First, I just wanted to say how much I appreciated all your
comments, emails and thoughts
regarding Monday's
reader survey results post.
November 19, 2010: NSBA's Letter to Secretary Duncan NSBA
comments regarding state and local education agencies» capacity and support in the Striving
Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program (SRCL).
I also tend to explain my changes as well as making «
reader»
comments regarding the story itself.
Interesting
comment regarding the
reader list and the freebies versus the traditional publishing houses now using kindle etc..
With
regard to his
comment that the lower prices will make it harder for «unknowns» to price their titles low enough to be discovered by the average
reader, wrong again.
For instance, see the
comment I made on DWS» blog a while back
regarding a conversation I had with a co-worker of mine who is by most measurements the gold effing ring of
reader demographics.
Also: I think Beth's
comment just shows that
readers aren't a monolith — there's a wide range of
reader behavior
regarding books (free and otherwise).
I received a couple questions /
comments from
readers lately
regarding Buffett and some previous
comments I made on strategy before and after the Berkshire annual meeting.
With more than a hat tip, but a full bow to my
reader Eric, I present a recent
comment of his: Eric Says:
Regarding your existing portfolio, you've sometimes held FXF and other Proshares Currency f...
I think someone should have been a little more aggressive and challenged CMHC... Not sure there is anything we could do now... But with
regards to penalties, I suggest you post your email so that the other
readers may contact you... so far, there appears to be a growing number of people that are tired of being gouged with unfair penalties... I have posted your
comment... take a minute to read some of the other names... there is a growing number of people replying... keep me posted... let me know if I can help.
To provide a sense of the issues covered, the table gives a sense of the questions that an independent moderator might ask that would lead to the exchange
regarding each paragraph, and the
reader may want to use this to jump to
comments and responses on a topic of particular interest.
If SLAW
readers are aware of other notices to the profession from other courts on this point of the acceptability of online versus print judgments, I would welcome
comments in that
regard.
When Sharlyn Lauby, SHPHR, CPLP, founder of Top 50 Business Blog HR Bartender, invited Resume Chicks Dawn Bugni and Jacqui Barrett - Poindexter to reply to a
comment from one of her
readers regarding «Should a pro write your resume?»
When Sharlyn Lauby, SHPHR, CPLP, founder of Top 50 Business Blog HR Bartender, invited me to reply to a
comment from one of her
readers regarding «Should a pro write your resume?»
The opinions expressed in the
reader comments section on this website, including, but not limited to, content or opinions
regarding any products or service mentioned on the website, are those of the
reader and not NAR or REALTOR ® Magazine.
Craig Berke, your noted
comment here on REM
regarding open houses, brought to my attention a very old article I wrote several years ago,
regarding the dangers and pitfalls of opens, information that might be useful to REM
readers and new agents; of course my writing is just «my opinion,» and opinions of others may be very different.
In response to the
comments I am reading along with a couple of notes received from
readers regarding the perceived for sale by ownership type ads, I would like to clarify REM's position on advertising.