As many of us know there continues to be a bias by many in the media, book retailers, and
readers against self - published books.
Not exact matches
I want to once again remind
readers that
self - defense — including defense
against tyrannical government — is more than a right guaranteed in the Second Amendment to our Constitution; it is a duty assigned us in Nature by our Creator.
I'm coming up
against a dilemma here: stick to my
self - imposed deadlines and into the hands of beta
readers or keep going to make sure it's in the best shape possible before handing it off.
As authors and business owners,
self - publishers need to toe that line between acquiring new
readers while also maintaining a high perceived value for their books — so Midnight Publishing cautions
against pricing a book that low unless it's for a limited time and coincides with another type of discount or special, like Amazon's Kindle Countdown Deals.
Here's proof: a somewhat irreverent, even off - putting author, who revels in knee - jerk unconventionality and
self - styled religious kitsch, and is prejudiced
against Jesus «for being a man,» actually manages to convince her
readers that she may indeed be well on her way to becoming a committed Christian.
Instead of spending time trying to convince bloggers who may have a prejudice
against self - published books that time can be spent connecting with
readers who don't!
As a
self - published author of course I'd be
against it, but I'd also be
against it as a
reader.
Related Posts: Backlash
against Andrew Franklin's Toxic Commentary, Entering the Hybrid World Where
Readers Are Determiners of Author's Success,
Self - Publishing Brings a Renaissance in Publishing
It's not just having to arrange for your own editing via the trad publishing route — when I read arguments
against self - pubbing, I always hear about how hard it is to market your books and find your
readers.
There are many possible reasons why literary fiction has fewer examples of successful
self - published works, but perhaps the simplest answer is that
readers of the genre are served sufficiently by traditional publishers (This is a powerful argument
against self - publishing literary fiction to make money which means I'll have to do it to make art)
One of the hardest things about being an author — and that's not discriminating
against traditionally published, indie published, or
self - published — is reaching an audience of
readers with your work, and book fans have spent the last three days sharing the love for Readioactive.
Conversely, the dystopian dream of going
against the traditional prosperity cruelly presents
self - publishers with stressful pressure to make ends meet while maintaining the stellar communicative skills with
readers to make sure their independent distribution will not falter or fade into oblivion after the hyped promotional period.
The author wisely omits the more gruesome aspects of the pit to keep
readers from closing the book, but without sparing them completely, because Stauss»
self - imposed mission in writing this book is «to shock people into taking action
against dog fighting and at the same time change negative perceptions about the breed.»
In a competing situation aspects of REBBA would make your point moot
against Michael's and you know this, so you've limited the context in a
self - serving attempt to try and impress novice
readers.