Sentences with phrase «readers are familiar with»

Most of our readers are familiar with Windows 7, but just how knowledgeable are you?

GigaOM's regular readers are familiar with the plague of patent trolls.

In a classic judicial move, I'm going to preface this post with the assumption that readers are familiar with the underlying facts.

Whether it's overfishing, marine pollution, loss of coastal habitats like mangroves, or the ever growing threat of climate change and ocean acidification, there are plenty of reasons for this disturbing decline — and I suspect most TreeHugger readers are familiar with the disastrous way that human beings have managed our oceans.

In a scientific paper, a selective or misleading graph may be of little consequence (except for the author's reputation), as scientific readers are familiar with the further data and the previous scientific discussions, so they can easily judge the merits of an argument.

So having had a moment to thing it through, I would be extremely interested to take you up on your offer just in terms of your feelings on how to get a P / S multiple for a company... I'm sure all your readers are familiar with the various techniques you've shown us to get to an op margin to a price / sales ratio, perhaps sometimes you notice a wrinkle with op cash flow trends that influences your thoughts, perhaps other things in other cases — all great stuff that I come back to again and again to learn from.

Now she's branching out and exploring fan fiction: Her author website is under her own name, which readers are familiar with, and it focuses on her string of successful books.

Most important, Word of Mouse is an excellent example of «title ownership,» i.e., idea of creating a title you can «own,» or associate with your brand, that's related to words or phrases your readers are familiar with.

How many readers are familiar with even 5 % of them?

When it all boils down to the popular format that all readers are familiar with, the long - standing PDF format has long been the quick and perfect solution especially for those who prefer fixed layout.

Many of your readers are familiar with Greek and Roman gods but ignorant of Norse gods.

Knowing a book comes from an established company with a long list of previously - published titles that book readers are familiar with is the kind of signal people need to be persuaded to part with a few additional bucks for an otherwise unknown author.

A paragraph will do this because readers are familiar with the conventions of written language and barely notice the interruption.

The film is set in Whoville (vividly realized by production designer Michael Corenblith), and its residents, the Whos, are the same Christmas - loving lot that readers are familiar with.

Strength is the one universal parameter mentioned above that the majority of readers are familiar with.

Gooch assumes (and here he has an enormous advantage over Bailey, whose subject few contemporary readers are familiar with) that the reader of the biography already knows the fiction that its subject wrote.

C & C readers are familiar with the events leading up to the showdown.

Not saying such people are a majority, but I'm sure every reader is familiar with this kind of tactic.

Since the verb sosei («he will save») is an etymological pun on the Hebrew meaning of the name of Jesus, and since it is not explained as, for example, Immanuel is in 1:23, it must be assumed that Matthew's readers were familiar with it.

The latter is important because it shows the reader you are familiar with the qualifications, and it allows you to delve into information that is not included on your resume.

I don't know if anyone among the readers is familiar with how big companies process large payroll accts through automatic banking.

Not exact matches

Remember, these readers won't be familiar with your operation.

Most of you are familiar with Barbara Corcoran from the TV show Shark Tank, but one thing you might not know is that she described herself to me during our interview as «a below - average reader and an insecure student.»

Why It's Worth Reading: Beyond doubt this is the most influential book on negotiating ever written, so much so that most business readers will already be familiar with its basic concept, the proverbial «win - win» negotiation.

You are right that T - accounts would clarify much of this, FDR, but only for those who are familiar with T - accounts, and I suspect many readers are not.

Readers are no doubt familiar with the revolution in drilling technology that has resulted in substantial new North American oil production.

And for readers who are familiar with uranium bull markets, they are violent.

Frequent readers of this research publication are by now long familiar with our concern about an inventory led slowdown in steel (Making Volatility our Friend: Trading the Kitchin Cycle, 5/28/14, Unsustainable Steel Premiums, 9/3/14, Revisiting the Inventory Cycle, 10/1/14).

It was Philip Fisher, author of the groundbreaking Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits, who often exhorted his readers to be cautious about trading in the stock of a company they have known for many years and come to understand well for one with which they are not as familiar as it introduces different types of risk.

Some readers may be familiar with Pimco's Bill Gross and his critique of U.S. Treasury issues.

Goldberg is a political journalist, not a historian, and readers more familiar with the ideological twists and turns of the modern era will be familiar with his thesis: While the left has long depicted the right as fascist, it is in fact the left — from Hegel to Hitler to Hillary and, yes, the politics of meaning, too — that follows the fascist formula most influentially articulated by Mussolini: «Everything within the state; nothing outside the state; nothing against the state.»

The passages cited in this section are also characterized by their positive, optimistic tone, a tone less familiar to readers who frequent congregations with certain other orientations.

Because he is a voracious reader who goes in for heavy reading about ultimate concerns, his humor can be appreciated especially by those familiar with the pretentiousness of some religious and philosophical literature.

Eliade, who was for many years at the University of Chicago, will be familiar to most readers as the author of the four - volume A History of Religious Ideas and numerous other books dealing with religion and myth in human history.

Familiar themes — federalism, separation of powers, the Bill of Rights — are treated with enough texture to enable novice readers to judge several central disputes.

In a paper of this brevity, I have to assume that the reader is largely familiar with actual entities and eternal objects, in order to have adequate space for a discussion of nexus.

Readers will already be familiar with the work of Phillip Johnson, the hard - hitting critic of blind allegiance to Darwinian orthodoxy.

This is just a portion of a longer section which has astonishing resonances for the reader familiar with Girard.

Readers familiar with Leithart's lively pieces in these pages will not be disappointed by this little book.

Regrettably, this book might end up by persuading a reader who is not familiar with the history or literature that the enemies of anti-Semitism are infected by the same spirit of fanaticism and conspiracy - mongering that they claim to be combating.

Though readers who are familiar with fundamentalist culture of the 1970s and «80s will appreciate her descriptions of the impact that evangelist Joni Eareckson and traveling missionaries had on her as a small girl, and of her growing passion for the Bible and of her puzzlement over the relationship between creation and evolution, her story rarely penetrates the surface of that culture.

Readers who know Pilgrim at Tinker Creek (1974), Holy the Firm (1977) and Teaching a Stone to Talk (1982) are not only familiar with the autobiographical turn of her writing, but also with the power of a religious imagination that, while recognizably Christian; roams free.

I wish that all your readers were cognizant of this, yet in my own experiences as a writer who advocates for the full and equal inclusion of women in the church, I am all too familiar with the push back.

The considerable body of literature that deals with this problem is familiar to every reader of the Old Testament.

Many readers will be familiar with some of the traditional «arguments for the existence of God», such as that everything has a prior cause, but that the causal chain can not be continued back indefinitely, so that there must somewhere be a First Cause; or that since there are various degrees of perfection there must be a Perfect One by whom all lesser degrees are measured; or that all change in a thing is caused by something else which leads eventually to some Prime Mover.

For any modern reader at all familiar with the text knows that (1) «Pharisees» are hypocrites and (2) Jesus praises the publican.

Readers familiar with the history of Western theology may recall that one of its most troublesome problems has been that of how to reconcile the fact of human freedom with the existence of God.

First, we may not be cub - eating lions, but we do have cougars [a term which, for the benefit of readers not familiar with North American slang, refers to an older woman seeking a sexual relationship with a younger man].

It seems the four contributors assumed that the readers were already familiar with what theological interpretation is, and how to engage in the theological interpretation of Scripture.

Is there a reader even slightly familiar with the writings of Kurzweil and Leibowitz who would not recognize «ill - tempered,» «eccentric,» and «overzealous» as suitable descriptive terms for these men?