Sentences with phrase «readers of ya»

David Smolin's review of Hadley Arkes» new book, Natural Rights and the Right to Choose (February), disserves both the author and the readers of First Things.

What did Paul and the other writers of the New Testament try to impress upon the readers of their letters?

David Smolin does a disservice to the readers of First Things in his review of Hadley Arkes» recent book, Natural Rights and the Right to Choose.

The more encouraging messages from readers, and especially from the growing number of readers of college age, are those that say they discovered in First Things a perspective that enabled them to turn the cacophony of impassioned opinions into the paths of robustly constructive conversation.

With such diverse readers of the text, whose perspective is more instructive?

Of course, there have always been readers of the Bible — then as now — who miss even the broadest hints and insist on reading the creation story as straightforward history.

Augustine's use of the language of bodily experience is what makes the Confessions communicable to readers of every age.

He wrote, in New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism, «For some readers of the Bible rhetorical criticism may have an appeal lacking to other modern critical approaches, in that it comes closer to explaining what they want explained in the text: not its sources, but its power.»

The following is a question sent in by one of the readers of this blog.

(The misconception hardly needs exposing for readers of Process Studies, but reference to it serves to bring into focus the basic point at issue.)

Readers of Edward Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire or David Hume's Natural History of Re ligion will feel themselves at once in familiar territory.

In February, readers of the New York Times were enticed by this puzzling headline: «Clinton to Order Effort to Make Pollution Fairer.»

Readers of First Things should by now be well - acquainted with the heated national debate - in part inspired by these very pages - over the role and legitimacy of the modern Supreme Court, armed with the power of judicial review, in a country that proclaims itself to be self - governing.

I would like to make a suggestion to all of the readers of these comments.

It simultaneously informs readers of many things they did not know — and perhaps do not really need to know — and inhibits an engagement with what readers have not yet heard — and definitely need to hear.

When one looks at the myths of surrounding cultures, in fact, one senses that the current debate over creationism would have seemed very strange, if not unintelligible, to the writers and readers of Genesis.

Wright really picks up the pace with this chapter, which begins with a reminder to readers of what he means when he talks about «the authority of scripture.»

Let me remind readers of the extraordinary experience of Toyohiko Kagawa, who was undoubtedly an upsetter of people.

Much depends on exactly what is meant by «mind», but I daresay at least some readers of Faith magazine might have cause to question this assertion!

Readers of this magazine (and of our «Reasons for Believing» pamphlet What Makes Man Unique?)

This edition of Gerard's autobiography comes with a very useful introduction by Michael Hodgetts, known to many readers of Faith Magazine for his work as an educator at the Maryvale Institute, as historical director at Harvington Hall and as editor of both Recusant History and of the Volumes of the Catholic Record Society.

Put together the subscription base of America, The Christian Century, Commonweal, Crisis, Commentary, and First Things and you arrive at a total of a little over one hundred thousand, and many of those readers of course subscribe to more than one.

Readers of Volume 2 of Pope Benedict's Jesus of Nazareth will know that he supports the view that the fourth chalice was at the Cross.

As we approach the 50th anniversary of Lemaître's death in June, this interview, by Fr Joseph R. Laracy of Seton Hall University (South Orange, NJ, USA), gives readers of FAITH a unique glimpse into the life of this extraordinary Belgian priest.

Readers of the New York Times, which Alasdair MacIntyre has called «that parish magazine of affluent and self - congratulatory liberal enlightenment,» will have noticed the appearance on its op - ed pages of a relatively new genre of sermonizing.

Before we started planning this great adventure, I sought the advice of an old hand in the field of Catholic boys» schools, Eric Hester, well known to readers of this journal.

Smith reminds readers of the idea of divine accommodation, which suggests that «in the process of divine inspiration, God did not correct every incomplete or mistaken viewpoint of the biblical authors in order to communicate through them with their readers... The point of the inspired scripture was to communicate its central point, not to straighten out every kink and dent in the views of all the people involved in biblical inscripturation and reception along the way.»

Nearly illiterate evangelists pick it up quickly if they are frequent readers of the KJV.

She reminds her readers of the significance of the sacraments as an extension of that healing mission.

Readers of St Therese's autobiography may recall that she read this book before entering the Carmel and before even recognising her vocation to enter.

To readers of Gilead and Home, the earlier of Robinson's works focusing on the small Iowa town, Lila will be familiar as the much - younger wife of John Ames, the town's Congregationalist minister (and the narrator of Gilead).

Readers of Solzhenitsyn's «Repentance and Self - Limitation in the Life of Nations,» which dared to defend as essentially correct the common feature of ordinary speech that depicts nations as capable of guilt, repentance, and a «spiritual life,» will understand why, as will viewers moved by Nelson's Mandela core message in the film Invictus.

It serves, moreover, to correct the impression sometimes gained by readers of certain of his other works — that the author is one of those who emphasize Pauline and Johannine theology at the expense of the teaching of the Jesus of the Synoptics.

Some readers of this blog have criticized me in the past for appearing to support gay marriage.

According to Enns, we would do well to learn a few things from the Jewish readers of Scripture whose emphasis in engaging the holy text is «not on solving the problems once and for all but on a community upholding a conversation with Scripture with creative energy.»

Do you have any reasons why the readers of your post should attempt to see things the way you do?

Readers of First Thoughts will know by now that Martin Scorsese's adaptation of Silence by Shūsaku Endō was released in select theaters on December 23.

And this recent Christian concern, in turn, may open the door to new conversations with Jewish readers of those same passages in the Hebrew Bible.

Readers of SHS will recall my disgust at the appalling column by Jane Brody referring her readers to groups that promote and indeed, may also assist in suicides.

The original readers of the story of Jesus and the Samaritan woman must have felt themselves on familiar ground.

And this is exactly what Fr Holloway does also by coining the phrase familiar to readers of this magazine: The Unity - Law of Control and Direction.

Challenging perceptions of discrimination and prejudice, this emotionally resonant drama for readers of Lisa Wingate and Jodi Picoult explores three different women navigating challenges in a changing school district — and in their lives.

Its authors, Norman Dennis and George Erdos (neither of them Catholic) quoted The Ecclesiastical History of England by the Venerable Bede to remind readers of an earlier time when society had been in an equally parlous state.

THAT HIERARCHY THING AGAIN The former editor of America, a Jesuit weekly, offers his response to the Pew data to the readers of the Washington Post, many of whom probably found his analysis plausible.

Like many readers of my generation, I have been under Weil's spell (even, in an intellectual way, «in love» with her) since I first encountered her, while also often feeling immensely exasperated.

Readers of Oz have long known the autobiographical background to many of his fiction's most memorable characters.

Readers of almost any FAITH Magazine editorial since 1972 will know that we agree.

Readers of Last Testament may wonder, however, what in this fourth of Seewald's book - length interviews with the man who became Benedict XVI is going to change the views of a world media locked into its own certainties and «narratives», much less the views of Ratzinger's longtime Catholic critics.

Of particular interest to readers of this journal are Stanley Hauerwas, «Agency: Going Forward by Looking Back,» and Joseph Allen, «Recent Theological Discussion of Democracy.»

I often refer to the readers of this blog as a community, and indeed it often feels like one.