Interestingly, Amazon has essentially freed
readers up to judge a book by how long it will take them to read it, as the site includes a section where titles are designated by reading time.
Not exact matches
Justin notes that Paul's rhetorical strategy here is
to begin by talking about wicked people who had turned from God and gotten caught
up in all kinds of sins, only
to turn the argument on his
readers by declaring, «Therefore you have no excuse, O man, every one of you who
judges.
He made his point and it is
up to the
reader to judge it.
In the
up - front and honest style that has become the trademark of their blogs, they share with
readers twenty - seven ways
to reframe notions of dieting and weight, including: accepting that diets don't work, practicing intuitive eating, finding body - positive doctors, not
judging other women, and finding a hobby that has nothing
to do with one's weight.»
My main one is about 6,000, and I know I've got people on there who signed
up just because I used
to blog about self - publishing a lot, so it's hard
to judge how many of those people are actual
readers.
You may not be able
to «
judge a book by its cover,» but you can certainly entice
readers to pick
up your book and look through it, read what you've written on the back
to find out if they'd like
to give it a read.
The fruity firm's price fixing pushed
up costs for
readers, and was its attempt
to eliminate its rival from the market, the
judge said in the ruling.
This would be so much a problem if each site did at least give their criteria for
judging a game, but even then it's
up to the
reader to actually find out what that is, which those just perusing scores, or using meta - critic don't.
Peer review is necessarily and correctly tolerant where the claims are speculative but supported, and it is
up to the
reader to judge the degree
to which the evidence actually supports the claims.