But at least you are
reading about Christianity.
The more you research and
read about Christianity the more it shows it's like all the other thousands of religions a myth.
Not exact matches
How am I supposed to honestly answer you
about Christianity if I don't use at least the knowledge from having
read the Bible in my answer?
Read Rodney Stark's «The Rise of
Christianity» to get a realistic view of the radical changes
Christianity brought
about in the Roman Empire... many of which are * assumed * as rights in modern Western Civilization.
I just think some Christians are lazy and don't want to
read more
about the totality of scripture and delve deeper into interpretation... we prefer a grade 3
reading and comprehension level in many aspects of
Christianity.
I
read somewhere that Islam today is
about where
Christianity was in the middle ages.
So if one were to be convinced by Enlightenment arguments that
Christianity is true, what would that say
about the proper way to
read the Bible?
I invite anyone with a curiosity
about Christianity to
read the first 5 books straight through and not just cherry picking as most Christians do.
I find it interesting that the apparent atheists who feel the need to make themselves feel better by criticizing the bible and
Christianity with snide little comments would even waste their time
reading a blog —
about belief.
Dude, you are WAY out of your element, having
read the bible, a couple of times I might add, I can assure you that I know probably
about as much
about your religion as you do and quite a bit more
about the many religions out there apart from
christianity.
Regarding Ryan's ruminations on S.M. Hutchens» review of E.O. Wilson's The Creation: An Appeal to Save Life on Earth (warning: I've
read neither the book nor the review, just Ryan's post
about them), I think Ryan has it right in concluding that in Wilson's account of
Christianity «nature has become only a vehicle for supernature.»
If you do nt want to hear anything
about Christianity, or any other religion, then maybe you should not
read or comment
about the subject at all.
All the skeptics out there
reading this, you obviously like to
read so why don't you go do some real research and
read the Bible to get information
about Christianity or ask The Creator, God Almighty Himself.
In spite of all the current talk
about «social
Christianity,» etc. an unbiased and unprejudiced
reading of the Bible shows that converting men to their Lord is the work Christians are called to do.
Christianity is
about 500 years older than Isam, and Judaism is much, much older than
Christianity, and yet, with just a little
reading one finds that though each religion has its own holy men, many of those who are revered as prophets or knowledgeable men are the same person.
If you've
read Evolving in Monkey Town you know that some of my most serious doubts
about Christianity were triggered by questions related to religious pluralism and the destiny of the un-evangelized.
Yeah, because
Christianity is so kind to women... How
about reading that book you base your faith on before spouting off crap.
If anyone here wishes to know
about Christianity...
READ THE HOLY BIBLE, with emphasis on the New Testament!!!! Read for yourself what Jesus said and d
READ THE HOLY BIBLE, with emphasis on the New Testament!!!!
Read for yourself what Jesus said and d
Read for yourself what Jesus said and did..
When I began
reading the Bible, I had zero knowledge of anything
about Christianity or any faith, because I was unchurched and never
read a thing on any religion.
If people actually
read the Bible and not pretend they know it, you would see that
Christianity is all
about love towards one another.
How can we
read about this veneer - like faith and not shudder as we compare it to the broad, wide and often equally shallow thing that passes for
Christianity in so much of our culture and in so many of our churches?
Jeremy, i have been
reading your post for a long time now and i have been studying almost every day on my spare time
about Christianity.
I have also
read books
about Christianity from the perspective of these other religions.
Note: After doing a lot of
reading, research, and thinking on the topics in this post, I wrote a follow - up post
about the pagan roots of
Christianity here and some of my concluding thoughts
about Zeitgeist the movie.
learning
about Christianity, and after
reading the Sermon on the Mount, he decided that
Christianity was the most complete religion in the world.
Those of you who have
read Mere
Christianity know what I am talking
about.
Is it proseletyzing if I were to walk into a church and request to speak with a pastor
about christianity or is it proseletyzing if I'm sitting quietly in my house
reading when people show up at my door demanding to tell me
about their religion?
Christianity just didn't start in the 21 century if you want to know
about it,
read the entire Bible its
about Christians and are fellow brethren the Jews we are related through Yeshua (Jesus).
But I've gotten so sick of
reading articles
about Christianity where all those outside of it bash those in it and lump everyone together.
Just like there are stupid people who've never actually
read the bible and yet feel the need to post stupid and wrong statements
about Christianity on the CNN news blog.
This article is a joke, obviously you haven't
read the Bible if you believe these claims
about Christianity and the way the various terms are explained here.
However, I am very interested in learning more and so which of the above books
about Jesus or god that would be good for me to
read as I am being introduced to
Christianity?
Sometimes I think the church (
read: the institution, «
Christianity Incorporated») is afraid of what everyone else would think if they stripped themselves of the artificial crap, if they stopped — for all practical purposes — encouraging other to lie
about their emotional state (which, by extension, means they're encouraging others to SIN).
Ever since the Black Plague swept through Europe, Western
Christianity has had an unhealthy preoccupation with what happens to people after they die, and as a result, has often
read the Bible through life - after - death colored glasses so that everything seems to be teaching
about what happens to people after they die.
So is
Christianity really following Jesus or the writers of these gospels... oh and the Hebrew chapters has not clue who and when was it written... my suggestion is to spend sometime to know what you believe and what you want to believe... also if you really like to know
about what real Jesus was, please
read Quran... more eighty times the name of Jesus is mentioned in this book... where there is a chapter with Jesus» mother name «Mary» chapter 19, there is another chapter name «ale imran'the grand father of Jesus, chapter 3... and then compare what Jesus really was dear brother in mankind...
The Story of
Christianity Volumes 1 and 2 by Justo L. Gonzalez: My big summer
reading project this year is to learn more
about church history.
Frankly, that's why there is so much misinterpretation and misinformation out there
about Christianity, bc nobody wants to study the Bible, they just want to
read and think they are experts.
FR... if yr specifically talking
about Jesus, IMO popular
Christianity has him saying too much... it's doubtful that the Jesus of John's gospel is as historically accurate and authentic as the style we
read in the synoptics.
so if you are basing your judgement on
Christianity on the movies, try
reading the books and
reading about him too..
Are you sure it's not the way of
Christianity and you're not just in denial of what the religion is truly
about??? Something tells me you don't
read your bible often enough..
For all of those who are saying that
Christianity promotes slavery in any way, I encourage you to step away from the book of Leviticus (or any book in the OT that talks
about laws outside of the 10 commandments) and instead, go
read the book of Romans... you'll learn a lot more
about the true meaning the of the Bible there.
When one
reads about Roman pagan religion, particularly the Cybele / Attis cult, one of Rome's most prominent religions and
Christianity's biggest competitor, then it's hard to extrapolate what seems to be a condemnation of paganism and apply it to gay people who are Christians.
This is new territory for me, doing a book - length study of Jesus and the origins of
Christianity, but I have
read everything I could get my hands on, weighed all the scholarly debates, and hope my book will be useful to the book -
reading public in explaining what we can really know, historically,
about Jesus.
When Oxford academic CS Lewis wrote
about his adult conversion from atheism to
Christianity in Surprised by Joy (HarperCollins) in 1955 it became an apologetics classic, one still
read by Christians and seekers to this day.
It's not
about «I'm better than you, so you should die» — it's
about «I'm different and unique and so are you and I embrace that» — isn't that was Jesus» message really was??? Believe me, I have
read myriad books on religion, and not just
Christianity.
No offence but I doubt I could
read any argument on your site
about «moral issue» or «apparent contradiction» that I haven't
read elsewhere and I am done with silly conversations that are
about point scoring between atheism and
Christianity.
If you want to understand what Mormons believe
about Christ and
Christianity read the following:
Hey Yoda,
christianity is «making
christianity a ridicule» — have you ever
read that book they all rave
about??
But as I
read this interview, I had two thoughts: 1) Driscoll is absolutely wrong in the way that he characterizes emerging
Christianity, and I hope he is absolutely wrong in the way that he characterizes Reformed theology, and 2) Driscoll is absolutely right
about the fact that Reformed and emerging are the big trends.
It was
about 1927, when Farrer was just a 22 - year - old Oxford student (Baillol College), that he indulged in a binge of
reading about the gnostic socio - cultural milieu from which early
Christianity emerged.