Sentences with phrase «reading legal text»

Not the best with reading legal text?

Do I have to make sure, that if my application wouldn't even start correctly on a device, that the user is able to start the application in an impossible, absurd, magic or religious way to ensure that he can read the legal texts or is it enough to state it on the website then?

Not exact matches

Owen Fiss urges judges to avoid an «arid and artificial» focus upon the words and original meaning of constitutional provisions by instead reading «the moral as well as the legal text» of the Constitution.

Gorsuch considers himself a «textualist» and «originalist» who turns to the plain text of legislation for legal intent and reads the U.S. Constitution as it was construed by the Founding Fathers.

Following on from the legal ceremony, we staged our own take on a wedding ceremony, including «there in love in you» by Four Tet (an album Jon bought for Nat as a gift on their first valentine's) whilst our friends and family contributed beautiful readings and poetry from Baha'i, Christian and non religious texts.

«Rather, in keeping with the text and purpose of the FDCPA, we merely reiterate that any such letters, when read in their entirety, must not deceive or mislead the least - sophisticated debtor into believing that she has a legal obligation to pay the time - barred debt.»

Throughout the project's chapters, which take shape as performances, theatrical / cartographic works, sound - and text - based installations - as - stage - sets, as well as writings and conversations, the «alien» turns into a discursive tool that allows for the setting up of alternative archives from which to read and locate corporate and state - sponsored forms of violence and their enabling legal apparatuses.

But if you go read the actual full decision — which is the ONLY way that carefully negotiated legal texts like this can be read accurately — you see that this statement comes from a pre-ambular paragraph that begins with the phrase «further recognizes.»

This situation has made it necessary for organisations like Educaloi in Quebec, or other public legal education associations across the country to offer tools for those who can not read complex texts, let alone «legalese».

Reading the constitutional text in light of this established legal understanding, we conclude that the President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill to sign it within the meaning of Article I, Section 7.

Together with Bryan A. Garner, Scalia is the author of two books about legal writing, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts, and Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Julegal writing, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts, and Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading JuLegal Texts, and Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges.

As an example of this trend towards shorter, mostly online legal scholarship, consider the recent tit for tat between Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner on the one hand, and Judge Posner on the other, regarding Judge Posner's review of Justice Scalia's and Garner's new book on statutory interpretation: Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Tlegal scholarship, consider the recent tit for tat between Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner on the one hand, and Judge Posner on the other, regarding Judge Posner's review of Justice Scalia's and Garner's new book on statutory interpretation: Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal TLegal Texts.

Today, a brief interview on PBS with US Supreme Court Justice Scalia, who published in June Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts.

Since 1990, Michael Frost has written a series of articles and, finally, a treatise, all applying classical principles of rhetoric to modern legal writing and advocacy.164 His repeated reading and application of classical rhetorical texts to legal advocacy has defined his publishing career, and he has consistently — and rightly — strived to remind legal writers of their heritage in classical rhetoric.

A great achievement, Reading Law, The Interpretation of Legal Texts, but these views are not to be approached uncritically.

But there was, as Senator Hung notes, and as reading the full text of what Simon C posted, a 5:4 split on the essence of the legal argument about copyright.

Without even reading the text, the user has a coherent legal framework to consider the subject under consideration.

L. Rev. 489 (2002)(discussing how traditional composition theory has influenced legal writing pedagogy); Elizabeth Fajans & Mary R. Falk, Against the Tyranny of Paraphrase: Talking Back to Texts, 78 Cornell L. Rev. 163 (1993)(tying legal writing to concepts of critical reading); Philip C. Kissam, Thinking (By Writing) About Legal Writing, 40 legal writing pedagogy); Elizabeth Fajans & Mary R. Falk, Against the Tyranny of Paraphrase: Talking Back to Texts, 78 Cornell L. Rev. 163 (1993)(tying legal writing to concepts of critical reading); Philip C. Kissam, Thinking (By Writing) About Legal Writing, 40 legal writing to concepts of critical reading); Philip C. Kissam, Thinking (By Writing) About Legal Writing, 40 Legal Writing, 40 Vand.

We had to think about how writing on a keyboard using software with increasingly sophisticated word processing capabilities affected the writing process, and whether the ease of composing on - screen changed the writer's relationship to the text.7 We had to confront the ways digital technologies change the way we read and process information.8 As email became ubiquitous, we had to think about how the speed of that type of communication affected the writing process, and what new forms legal analysis could take when delivered via email.9 As technology simplified the process of embedding images into documents and made possible incorporation of video and other interactive elements, whole new areas of scholarly inquiry have opened up.10 We have started to address these questions, but we still have so much to learn about how technology impacts how we go about writing legal documents.

It is perhaps more comparable to the firm's usage fees for legal research facilities such as Westlaw, which would naturally still demand a junior lawyer to pore over what the search engine could find, read through it and isolate the key issues in the text.