Sentences with phrase «reading of the actual science»

I can suggest you do a lot more reading of the actual science before leaping to unwarrented conclusions.

Not exact matches

Fifth, the right wing websites, who would never be caught dead reading a hostile left wing website and who would never read anything written by actual scientists (who they consider to either be part of the liberal elite or part of an ill - defined conspiracy), never hear about what poor science the study they're celebrating actually is, and go right on believing that their anti-global warming position is so obviously correct that everyone else must either be fools or conspirators.I believe the link pfft posted is step three.

It tells you where everything is it every moment and you are supposed to be able to, it gives you all the tea leaves that you could read; but I went from that just the same way the rest of human history went of being interested in that kind of pseudoscience to actually seeing the pleasure in actual science, and the utility of it, too.

If you're interested in more of the actual science about why saturated fat can be healthy for you, I have an article below written by a PhD in Nutritional Biochemistry called The Truth about Saturated Fat - it's a must read if you want to understand the science about why saturated fats have been falsely villified and how to enjoy these foods that have always been part of the ancestral human diet.

All of them, in large part, because they have experience working with the actual dogs, and read the science, and realize the aggession is not a breed - specific issue - and the reality is that most dogs, regardless of breed, do not show aggressive behavior — and yet, some dogs, of each breed, have.

Understanding the social and cognitive components of science is certainly important, but the abstract reads as if the possibility that we are discussing estimates of an objective quantity with an actual quantitative value is a matter of complete irrelevance.

Martha: «No one who reads actual science is able to engage with questions about the recent decades of warming of the ocean and why this has been greater than the older models predicted...»

No one who reads actual science is able to engage with questions about the recent decades of warming of the ocean and why this has been greater than the older models predicted, by visiting here...

Science Corrupted: It's «the hottest year on record», as long as you don't take its temperature — Activist James Hansen's claims based on «pure conjecture» — Hansen's Climate Con: «The parts of the world which GISS shows to be heating up the most are so short of weather stations that only 25 per cent of the figures are based on actual temperature readings»

However from what I have read and what I have seen, much of the actual science seems to be flawed, and is heavily weighted on assumptions which are in turn based on assumptions, based on sketchy data, in which much of the methods used are questionable.

They further described Lomborg's text as having «misrepresented the actual positions of environmentalists and scientists» with an analysis that was «marred by invalidating errors that include a narrow, biased reading of the literature, an inadequate understanding of the science, and quotations taken out of context.»

As to my sources, maybe you should read some, I almost always quote from actual peer reviewed science (obviously foreign to you since you think sizes of numbers is science), like this one that says that long lived greenhouse gases are the control knob and that water vapor (with its lifetime of a couple of weeks) just reacts to changes.

I suggest you start reading about the actual science of climate change.