Sentences with phrase «reading our data scientist»

Learn how to write an unforgettable opening by reading our data scientist cover letter example.

Not exact matches

It's impossible to put down and impossible to read without being moved and vicariously enraged,» says data scientist Cathy O'Neil.

The Brain can read a thousand articles a minute, says Dean Rootenberg, DDIQ's chief data scientist.

fin, just saw your comment from 12/3 and I would respond with a news quote I read recently «one in seven UK based scientists or doctors has witnessed colleagues Intentionally altering or fabricating data during their research or for the purposes of publication» British Medical Journal, Britain.

Anyone who doesn't realize that the authorship is honorary — that is, almost everyone who reads the paper — will wrongly assume that this well - known scientist has performed his or her role in ensuring the integrity of the data.

As part of an ongoing joint project between UAH, NOAA and NASA, Christy and Dr. Roy Spencer, an ESSC principal scientist, use data gathered by advanced microwave sounding units on NOAA and NASA satellites to get accurate temperature readings for almost all regions of the Earth.

«My working theory is that perhaps shorter paper titles are easier to read and easier to understand,» thus attracting wider audiences and increasing the likelihood of a citation, says lead author Adrian Letchford, a data scientist at the University of Warwick in Coventry, U.K.

The new method uses strands of DNA to store the data in a way that scientists can then read.

Now, it is apparent from reading even the first few pages of The Skeptical Environmentalist that Lomborg proposes to make the case that not just environmentalists, but a considerable part of the heretofore respectable environmental - science community, have been misunderstanding the relevant concepts, misrepresenting the relevant facts, understating the uncertainties, selecting data, and failing to acknowledge errors after these have been pointed out in other words, that the scientist contributors to what he calls «the environmental litany» (namely, that environmental problems are serious and becoming, in many instances more so) have been guilty of massively violating the scientists code of conduct.

Data - quality issues, including the reanalysis and reprocessing of past observations, have become a topic in its own right in climate research, says Adrian Simmons, a senior scientist at the European Centre for Medium - Range Weather Forecasts in Reading, UK, and chairman of the GCOS steering committee.

MAUNA KEA, HI — A detailed study of the motions of different stellar populations in Andromeda galaxy by UC Santa Cruz scientists using W. M. Keck Observatory data has found striking differences... Read more»

At some point, scientists might be able to save space by not storing sequences in full, similar to the way data is managed in particle physics, where information is read and filtered while it is generated.

The electron spin, which is less resilient to electromagnetic stimulation than the nuclear spin, was used as a processing qubit that the scientists used to read and write data.

I wish every nutrition scientist would read this and start realizing that there is 50 % of the world, that like the ocean, is mostly uncharted territory as far as experiments and data go.

In this web focus we present opinion pieces, along with research and overview articles that explore the dynamic processes that... «Love his canine back - up data collector»: Scientist's interview about revolutionary tsunami sensor he has created is completely Read More...

eSpark Learning's team of data scientists used MAP data to diagnose student skill levels and differentiate math and reading instruction at scale throughout Piedmont Elementary School.

Through a series of weekly WERMShops, students meet local scientists, read scientific journals, explore local natural areas and practice data - collection methods using GPS and GIS.

I have lately read some comments from the NAS panel that some of the climate scientists there agree that it is not possible to make very good statistics on the temperature data from 2000 years ago and further... What about that?

as compared to being a real scientist getting a mediocre salary, having to write scientific books your wife wouldn't even read, having to gather data and samples in the too hot, or too cold, field, and doing experiments in a warm, smelly laboratory on unobtanium, where you could accidentally set your tie on fire with a bunsen burner, well, which one would you choose?.

Any reader — even without technical or information - systems background — is invited to click on the link in my post above and see immediately with his or her own eyes that HARRY READ ME is a three - year diary involving a very wide range of activities, transactions and programs involving more than a dozen countries and encompassing collection and processing of major portions of the raw temperature data which underlie more than two of the principal databases used by «climate change scientists».

great interview Anthony (with Andrew Bolt) If you have time to do any reading on the net check out http://kenskingdom.wordpress.com/2010/05/12/the-australian-temperature-record-part-1-queensland/ link there to part 2 NT and W A he's comparing the BOM's high quality data (homogenised) with the raw data and Warwick Hughes (an earth scientist) who I hope you will meet in Canberra at http://www.warwickhughes.com/blog/ has an interesting article on Distortions being spread about Australian meteorological history

As part of an ongoing joint project between UAHuntsville, NOAA and NASA, Christy and Dr. Roy Spencer, an ESSC principal scientist, use data gathered by advanced microwave sounding units on NOAA and NASA satellites to get accurate temperature readings for almost all regions on the Earth.

However the experience with land sensors is that the climate scientists that deploy the new sensors won't intercalibrate the new devices to the previous devices prior to deployment, but deploy them in the field and go «whoops — they read different — we need to adjust the data».

There's nothing in the snippits of the reports which I have time to read which indicates anything other than the scientists accomodated all reasonable requests for data and process as best they could.

(http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/03/30/nasa-data-worse-than-climategate-data/) Reading THAT article you get the sense that NASA scientists have indeed «admitted» that their data are not as accurate as the Hadley Centre's.

, so please do take a fresh look at what the PSI scientists are saying (albeit reading past Joe Postma's «anger», which while understandable, should be left out), i.e. the core scientific arguments, backed by experimental & observational data.

What is tragically evident from the Harry Read Me file is the picture it gives of the CRU scientists hopelessly at sea with the complex computer programmes they had devised to contort their data in the approved direction, more than once expressing their own desperation at how difficult it was to get the desired results.

2) In spite of the title of this email, I'm well aware — as are those who read this blog — that global warming alarmists have been exposed as fearmongering chicken little liars (not to mention hypocrites) for decades, but rarely has it been on a level where you actually have «scientists» and their associates caught on paper attempting to suppress data that is contra to their pre-desired result.

I note Gavin refers to non-climate scientists who challenge the AGW alarmists as «citizen scientists» perhaps he should consider the climate scientist who are doing data analysis as «citizen data analysts» because frankly from what I've read on these pages they seem to be a pretty amateurist bunch.

I think my point was (in an admittedly obscure way) that sometimes climate scientists try to read WAY to much into their anlalysis of uncertain data.

If you ever read Isaac Asimov's book Foundation, you might remember a similar episode where a character is amazed that scientists no longer seek out new empirical data, but just manipulate data from previous studies.

That is the discovery made by scientists using data from CryoSat - 2, the European probe that has been measuring the thickness of Earth's ice sheets and glaciers since it was launched by [continue reading...]

Reading back through the blow - by - blow account of the entire debacle does give us some fresh reasons to be mad about the whole thing — for starters, in all the hubbub over whether or not climate scientists were amassing a global conspiracy or using «tricks» to hide data (long, long debunked), it's worth remember that the one guy who actually committed a real crime has barely even been pursued.

Indeed, having personally read each and every one of the emails liberated from the Climategate Research Unit at East Anglia in the UK and all the Freedom of Information emails from NASA - GISS in New York, it is clear to me some of those scientists have violated their ethical obligations to both science and we taxpayers who fund their work by «cooking the books» to fudge and bend the data, often beyond the breaking point.

In the wake of recent events surrounding the IPCC's inclusion of speculative data on Himalayan glacier melting, and those surrounding the hacked climate emails, a recent editorial by New Scientist is particular worth reading.

A proper reading of this material will also demonstrate that CRU did not regard its «assembly of 160 years of global thermometer data» as «private property», as New Scientist claims.

And their primary accomplices are the scientists at GISS, who put the altered data through an even more biased regimen of alterations, including intentionally replacing the dropped NOAA readings with those of stations located in much warmer locales.

Every scientist is set on securing the next grant and it's not unusual to read some amazing claims on the significance or impact of a given set of data.

As part of an ongoing joint project between UAHuntsville, NOAA and NASA, John Christy, a professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center (ESSC) at The University of Alabama in Huntsville, and Dr. Roy Spencer, an ESSC principal scientist, use data gathered by advanced microwave sounding units on NOAA and NASA satellites to get accurate temperature readings for almost all regions of the Earth.

His 2012 campaign hired «predictive modeling and data mining scientists,» according to job advertisements, which read: «Modeling analysts are charged with predicting the behavior of the American electorate.

«We are a team of data scientists, engineers and marketing experts passionate about harnessing the power of AI for consumer outreach and communications,» reads the company's website.

After reading Kosinski and Wang's paper, three sociologists and data scientists who spoke with Quartz questioned whether the author's assertion that gay and straight people have different faces is supported by the experiments in the paper.

Read articles about Python and R, learning data science, interviews with data scientists, and more.