Sentences with phrase «reading reviews written»

Read reviews written by parents who have installed the infant car seat to gauge how easy or hard it is to place in your vehicle.

find agencies in their area both by postcode or by name; rate agencies using a simple star rating system on levels of pay, quality of training, ease of finding work and support received; write reviews, explaining their experiences, both good and bad, of the agency, or agencies, they have used; read reviews written by other supply teachers, including viewing their star rating and seeing the average levels of pay that are offered; add new supply agencies as and when they open; and participate in regular polls, highlighting the key issues that affect supply teachers.

Also, read the reviews written on the customer support.

It feels like I read every review written about this SUV.

You can read reviews written by readers just like you to help find books that you could enjoy.

I got the one with the 4G cellular, and you can read the review I wrote for it if you click here or type in http://smarturl.it/89firereview into your web browser.

You'll be able to filter, browse and search results by genre, read reviews written by fellow gamers — including those voted «most helpful» by the Xbox Live community, easily recognize what titles are on sale with strikethrough pricing in lists, and more.

I recommend that you read the reviews written by Sean Doherty, Greg Lambert, Joe Hodnicki and Little Richard.

One of the best ways to gauge the quality of an insurance company is to read reviews written by customers.

You'll be able to filter, browse and search results by genre, read reviews written by fellow gamers — including those voted «most helpful» by the Xbox Live community, easily recognize what titles are on sale with strikethrough pricing in lists, and more.

If you've read past reviews here on SlashGear about OnePlus devices, chances are you were reading a review I wrote — and I care very much about one of these pressure points and very little about the other.

Read the reviews written by students; that's the product this school puts out.

Not exact matches

Reviewing the KAISER paper, researcher Anders Fogh wrote in a blog last July that it might be possible to abuse so - called speculative execution in order to read kernel memory.

(Read Jonathan Vanian's write - up here, where you also can watch the video, as well as Andrew Nusca's review in today's CEO Daily.)

One can do this by reading critical reviews that all focus on the same negatives; if most critics are saying something is wrong, it probably is,» King wrote.

I wrote about my thoughts on Markel as an investment idea a few years ago, which you can review if you're interested in reading more about the business.

I plan on writing a review of the book for a future AM / FX but Danielle's insider status and extreme lack of filter make for some spicy reading (she worked at the Dallas Fed for 9 years, advising Richard Fisher).

A small price that I have paid for the privilege of writing book reviews for First Things is that I have ended up reading four of Richard Dawkins» books.

After reading, reviewing, and writing on Hannah Arendt, I have come to think of her, fairly or otherwise, as a special voice, one of many» they range from Thomas Mann to Karl Jaspers to Marlene Dietrich» who came through the fires of hell called Nazi Germany with their consciences intact.

and yes Barak, I have read a portion of the peer reviewed literature in the field and written a few articles myself.

So if Thom Rainer ever reads this review, I would invite him to write a follow - up book which church pastors can hand out to people who are leaving their church.

But one of the first book reviews I read, written by a dear friend and mentor, started out by saying «Introverts in the Church.

I think I read it about 2 - 3 years ago and probably wrote a short review of it on this site.

Since writing the review of the Colson and Pearcey book, my understanding of what Schaeffer was trying to do has been sharpened by reading a 1948 Bible Today article in which he argued that the controversy between evidentialism and presuppositionalism presents a false alternative.

In a remarkable review of Michael Oakeshott's Rationalism in Politics in the English journal Philosophy (January 1965) that ought to be read by all self - described conservatives, Kolnai wrote:

So a Christian who was a fan of this book (and the author) commented that this was the stupidest review they had ever read... Another Christian weighed in and said that the commenter was stupid as well for just using cut - and - paste attacks upon people who write critical reviews.

• If reading (or writing) history is your pleasure, you might want to get to know Elias Crim, editor of a new bimonthly review called The Armchair Historian.

I did not find this an easy book to read, and this review will touch on three areas that come from my encounter with the writing.

That's a huge pet peeve of mine, having encountered multiple reviews of my own books written by people who admit they didn't even read them first.)

But it thrilled me to read smart, relevant, and often sharp - edged essays and reviews written by men and women who think faith matters: matters for our political system, matters for our culture, matters for our souls.

Atheist Terry Eagleton wrote a review for the London Review of Books entitled «Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching» that began with the memorable quote: «Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology.&review for the London Review of Books entitled «Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching» that began with the memorable quote: «Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology.&Review of Books entitled «Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching» that began with the memorable quote: «Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology.»

I write not to dispute with him, but to clarify my stance on the label some have attached to my work after reading his review, namely, «integralist.»

Sounds like an amazing book and your review — which is thorough and excellently written by the way — makes me want to add it to me ever - growing reading list.

And if you have read the book and enjoyed it, please consider writing a review on theAmazon page.

Their theory was that one could not write a book review that did the book justice, if one read that many books per year, regardless of how few book reviews one wrote.)

Time to update this thread... but I don't have time to write reviews of the books I have read.

I can not even review this book properly, because I forgot what Bonhoeffer wrote immediately after I finished reading it!

The review represents a beginning of writing which immediately leads to another text, toward one reading and one's readings.

I had read much of Borges's work, including many relatively unknown essays and reviews, as I prepared to write a dissertation on his «Libros y autores extranjeros» («Foreign Books and Authors»), a biweekly column he published from 1936 - 39 in the Buenos Aires magazine El Hogar.

Note: If you have read and written a review of The Bible Made Impossible, share a link here!

... wow, lot's of mis - statements here by people speculating about the Bible and Jesus, including those of you who think the books of the Bible were written a few hundred years ago (Moses penned it around 1400BC)... the Bible is a collection of the most investigated writings of all time, so there is a tremendous amount of credible archeological and scientific material in this world available for review rooted in verifiable investigations... my response, read the Bible, do your own investigation, determine the Truth for yourself... hopefully, anne rice's denouncement of faith in the God of the Bible (it's difficult for me to believe she ever had Saving Faith in the first place) will bring some readers to investigate and find the Truth... God will call the Elect, not one more, not one less...

I would ask that you either write a brief post on your blog inviting your readers over to read your review, OR, when you get to the section in your series on preterism, include links to your guest posts at that time.

I was so angry and hurt that I thought I would write that I would never read National Review again.

Do keep reading, writes Mark Edmundson in The Chronicle Review.

wow, didn't ever think about making this until I read this review, looks really good and like, as you write, having the control over ingredients, thank you for this

Looking over this recipe, and reading some of the reviews gave me the impression that this recipe, as written, could perhaps use a little flavor boost.

I read the other reviews before making this, but I felt I had to try it as written just to see for myself.

The authors» responsibilities were as follows — CNM: had leadership responsibility for the research planning and execution, wrote the manuscript, and had primary responsibility for the final content of the manuscript; CNM, HE, and BN: formulated the study idea and designed the research; EV and JM: managed the day - to - day conduct of the study and oversaw the data collection; YJ: performed statistical analyses of the study data; and all authors: provided critical review and commentary on the draft of the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

First things first, if you're incredulous about «a» then I hope you will take the time to read this article written by a registered dietitian or this one reviewed by a MD..

-LSB-...] Write a review Save Recipe Print Ingredients 4 medium sweet potatoes 2 eggs, whisked 1/2 cup almond flour 2 teaspoons sea salt 1/4 cup green onions, chopped (plus some for garnish) 1/4 c Read the full article here -LSB-...]