Sentences with phrase «reading scientific studies»

Mud Bay is admirable for the degree to which they take customer care seriously and they differentiate themselves by going the extra mile, reading scientific studies, interviewing veterinary nutritionists, visiting the manufacturing facilities and collecting anecdotal data about how well a food feeds.

This study was very interesting, and not just because I'm a nerd who loves reading scientific studies.

I recently read a scientific study that covered all types of sport and what came out was that home teams are still favourites to win games, and not because of the motivational factor of the players but purely because of the support of the crowd.

I read a scientific study about this a couple of years ago, where they investigated SIDS deaths and what had caused them.

So if you are already a new dad or planning to become one, we offer you to read the scientific studies to know the reality of such a wonderful stage of life as fatherhood.

Denise Minger has only a B.A. and just reads scientific studies without ever conducting original research.

Organic butter and coconut oil are best, organic coconut oil is the very best For more on this, I'd recommend you do some more extensive research by reading the scientific study Sally Fallon did in her book Eat Fat Lose Fat

I've read scientific studies that say if I pretend I'm in a good mood, or if I fake a smile, I can actually trick my brain into making me feel better.

Not exact matches

However, what made me a Hof believer is when I read this scientific case study that explained this:

In the two years I've been writing about open - plan offices, I've read dozens of scientific studies on the subject, all of which point out that they're a productivity disaster.

I read an interesting article today written by a quantum mechanic claiming that the new direction in such scientific studies is that we can't be sure there is an objective reality but can only hope so, because what we perceive as reality is shaped by the observer.

Before Islam they worship idols After worshiping the one absolute God Before Islam they didn't know Jesus or Mary or any prophets After Islam who deny Jesus or Mary become blasphemer Before no payers no charity no family relation After Islam it become must Before Islam us - u-ry and slavery adultery was common After Islam got forbidden Before Islam women has no value and all her property to her husband After Islam become her own she can do what she like within Islamic laws Before Islam the girls - child were buried alive After Islam no girls - child were buried alive Before Islam no laws or guidance to people After Islam established the laws or guidance to people (sharia) Before Islam tribes killing each others After Islam they became brothers Before Islam there was no education After Islam became must and first word came to Muhammad from the angle was (read) Before Islam no scientific study After Islam seculars in chemistry and math the no. 1234 are Arabic and innovated the ZERO Before Islam they were tribes After Islam became empire from Spain to china And More.......

«More so than for any other religious tradition, a person can become UU because of what he already believes rather than believing what he does because of becoming a UU,» said James Casebolt, coauthor of two papers on the regional survey read at the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion annual meeting in October.

And while I realize the likelihood of you ever having read a scientific paper is slim to nil, I hope you realize that such studies strive to be free of bias.

You should read up on what the scientific community and their studies have to say about gays and lesbians.

I have never read any mention of the word god at any point of time in any scientific study.

The main ones I read were the China Study (a little bit scientific) and In Defense of Food.

Whenever you read a supposed study or «scientific» statement given about a food, the one thing one always needs to keep in mind is that food is not a static entity, like a chemical listed in the periodic table of elements.

For example, if you read a supposedly «scientific» statement such as: «red meat causes [fill in the blank with your most dreaded disease]» — do some further scrutiny and find out if indeed studies exist showing this, and how the food is defined that was used in the study.

Research With the premise that science isn't perfect, but it's the best guide we've got, Zero to Five draws on scientific research and studies from experts such as Dimitri Christakis (screen time), Diana Baumrind (parenting styles), Adele Diamond (neuroscience and executive function), Carol Dweck (growth mindset), Alison Gopnik (child psychology), John Gottman (marriage and conflict resolution), Megan McClelland (executive function), Patricia Kuhl (language acquisition and brain development), Ellyn Satter (feeding children), Dan Siegel (emotions), Paul Torrance (creative thinking), Grover Whitehurst (literacy and reading comprehension), and more.

I was super relieved when I read a recent scientific study that proves that quality of time spent with our children trumps the quantity of time.

And the best way to sort it out is by carefully evaluating scientific studies - not by visiting Internet chat rooms, reading magazine articles, or talking to friends.

I would be interested reading the actual study and scientific report where is shows the elevation in triglyceride levels.

If you read the scientific and medical literature, the controversy about bed sharing safety primarily concerns babies less than 20 weeks old, and the most recent meta - analysis of published studies found no evidence of increased risk for babies over 3 months of age (Carpenter et al 2013).

I read dozens of studies on breastfeeding that all claim to be «scientific» but frequently contradict each other.

As a scientist myself, I want to pass on a very important piece of information to everyone — do not believe what you read in the summaries or headlines of scientific studies!

We are supposed to believe that obstetricians (with 8 years of higher education, extensive study of science and statistics, and four additional years of hands on experience caring for pregnant women), the people who actually DO the research that represents the corpus of scientific evidence, are ignoring their own findings while NCB advocates (generally high school graduates with no background in college science or statistics, let alone advanced study of these subjects, and limited experience of caring for pregnant women), the people who NEVER do scientific research, are assiduously scouring the scientific literature, reading the main obstetric journals each month, and changing their practice based on the latest scientific evidence.

But a recent analysis of scientific studies in neuroscience, which was published online in Nature Reviews Neuroscience earlier this month, urges caution both in reading the literature and in designing your own experiments.

Many of the submissions from doctors (she recognized a few of the names from questionable JAMA papers) read more like advertising testimonials than well - designed, well - executed scientific studies.

It would read and understand scientific literature, connecting the dots between studies and suggesting hypotheses that could lead to significant breakthroughs.

But it is okay to study for class, read scientific articles, or prepare for your qualifying exam while waiting.

An identical statement on two papers published online this year in Scientific Reports reads: «The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of our institutions.»

Larry Hjelmeland, a blind researcher at the University of California, Davis, who studies the biology of eye ageing, says that Apple's latest operating system has made it much easier for him to read everything from e-mails to scientific papers.

One way to discover such specific interest is to read the scientific literature in a field you enjoyed during your undergrad studies.

«We're actually reading words much like we identify any kind of visual object, like we identify chairs and tables,» says study author Jonathan Grainger, a cognitive psychologist at France's National Center for Scientific Research, and Aix - Marseille University in Marseille, France.

Two papers by Langmead and team, Ultrafast and memory - efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome and Fast gapped - read alignment with Bowtie 2, have been cited in more than 12,000 scientific studies since 2009.

Read more about the study, its findings and the scientific concepts behind them, on the EuroStemCell Research spotlight.

FRBs first came to the attention of the scientific community in 2007, when Parkes researchers studying archival data came across a short, sharp spike in readings taken six years earlier.

Over the next year, she read scientific papers and studied the problem some more.

Read up on the latest news from breaking scientific studies, current events, and trending topics in wellness.

After reading several scientific studies, I found out that Aspartame is safe unless you have a genetic disease called Phenylketonuria.

Or you can read my interpretation of two different scientific studies at Finding the Best Abdominal Exercises for your Ab Workouts And Review of a Muscle Activation Study.

On the latter site, pictures of Minger and Campbell are posted side by side and the title reads in the spirit of civil discourse and scientific debate that «China Study Author Colin Campbell Slaps Down Critic Denise Minger.»

For an even better perspective on what makes good ab exercises read my review of a scientific study on muscle activation to determine effective ab exercises.

This Danish study (read the scientific article here) showed that one in four had 40 % less gut bacteria than average.

While I have read of a few people online with testimonials who have had success with Protocel, there are no scientific studies for it at this time, so I can not recommend it.

Please read my Forks Over Knives review for more information on what's wrong with the conclusions drawn from Campbell's casein / aflatoxin research, and if you'd rather look at peer - reviewed research than the words of some random internet blogger, see my collection of scientific papers based on the China Study data that contradict the claims in Campbell's book.

VESPA & OFM are notably lacking the kind of direct journal published studies many nutrition and supplement companies love to wave around as «proof» their product «works» and sports nutritionists like to refer without rigorously reading the entire study and critically considering the scientific design.

I'd stay up late reading diet books and scientific studies, trying to figure out whether a single ingredient was bad for me.

The scientific studies I've read suggest that autophagy STARTS after 12 hours of fasting.