I don't like to be alarmist, or give too much weight to any one test result, but last week's release of 2016
reading test scores around the world is now the third major proof point that something is awry.
Not exact matches
In your article
around Baltimore's technology gap («Computer - based
tests a challenge for low - income students, some Baltimore teachers say,» April 22), we
read that students who took the PARCC
scored lower when they took the
test on a computer than when they used paper and pencil.
The research studied the
reading test scores of more than 200,000 15 - year - olds from over 8,000 mixed - sex schools
around the world.
International
test scores put our math and
reading proficiency
around thirtieth in the world, which points to low future growth.
In your article
around Baltimore's technology gap («Computer - based
tests a challenge for low - income students, some Baltimore teachers say,» April 22), we
read that students who took the PARCC
scored lower when they took the
test on a computer than when...
They never get
around to explaining why
test scores just released by New York State show 94 percent of Eva Moskowitz's Success Academy students — almost all minority — passed the 2016 math exam and 82 percent passed the
reading exam.
In recent years, however, the federal law known as No Child Left Behind has put pressure on schools to raise
scores on the standardized
reading and math
tests given to students starting
around age 8.
The study, published in School Effectiveness and School Improvement, looked at
reading test scores of more than 200,000 15 - year - olds from over 8,000 mixed - sex schools
around the world.
While educators
around the world have recognized Finland's consistent top
scores in
reading, math and science on international
tests, the author was instead struck by how joy was prioritized in Finnish schools.
We
tested this via network cable and the
scores were
around 45.6 Mbps for writing and 54.6 Mbps for
reading.