As a result, Cassellius wrote,» we may see what looks like a drop in
reading test scores when they are reported this summer.»
Not exact matches
In your article around Baltimore's technology gap («Computer - based
tests a challenge for low - income students, some Baltimore teachers say,» April 22), we
read that students who took the PARCC
scored lower
when they took the
test on a computer than
when they used paper and pencil.
When kids eat breakfast they demonstrate broader vocabularies, improved memory and faster speed on cognitive
tests, and they
score higher in both
reading and math.
When compared to control group counterparts in randomized trials, infants and toddlers who participated in high - quality home visiting programs were shown to have more favorable
scores for cognitive development and behavior, higher IQs and language
scores, higher grade point averages and math and
reading achievement
test scores at age 9, and higher graduation rates from high school.
I don't believe in fast food, and was intrigued
when I
read a study that suggested that the more often kids eat the junk, the lower they
score on standardized
tests.
Always remember,
when given a
test of their knowledge of current events regular viewers of Faux News
scored lower than folks who did not
read a newspaper — or watch any TV news.
Seizing on a sharp drop in
reading and math
scores after students took their first Common Core
tests, the teachers fed fears that kids would somehow suffer because their grades had fallen,
when the opposite was true.
The governor's push to increase the weight of
test scores upset the teachers» unions and many parents, and was considered a factor
when 20 percent of students sat out state math and
reading tests — which had been aligned with the Common Core national benchmarks — this year.
The students who used their assigned strategy correctly had the highest
scores on their science
tests, even
when the researchers controlled for students who had better
reading skills to begin with.
I investigate by analyzing national changes in PISA
reading scores from 2000,
when the
test was first given, to 2102.
According to an analysis by Eric Hanushek, Ludger Woessmann and Paul Peterson, Indiana was toward the back of the pack
when it came to
test score gains on the National Assessment of Educational Progress in
reading, math, and science from the early 1990s until today.
When we narrow our focus to «student outcomes» (
read:
test scores), we overlook the myriad reasons that schools appeal — or not — to parents.
When using one - hour
testing sessions to gauge student performance, combined
reading and math
scores serve as a better indicator of student achievement than either
test separately.
For example, two studies (in 1992 and 1997) found that the math and
reading test scores of students in South Carolina improved significantly
when the students were taught by teachers receiving merit pay.
Data from 22,000 children involved in this study of the kindergarten class of 1998 — 99 show that, after controlling for family income, children who attended more academically oriented preschools had significantly higher
scores in
reading, math, and general knowledge
when tested in the fall of their kindergarten year than children in preschool settings without academic content.
The Beaverton School District did just that four years ago
when it started Summa Options, a program of advanced curriculum for students who
score in the 99 percentile on standardized
reading and math
tests or a
test of cognitive ability.
The study, which followed 147 preschoolers in 21 settings, showed that children taught using the Tools method
scored significantly higher than did their counterparts on
tests of «executive function skills,» such as the ability to keep their behavior in check, control their impulses, and focus — skills that certainly don't hurt
when it comes to learning to
read.
We found little evidence that the Choice program increased the
test scores of participating students, though our final analysis revealed a positive effect of the program on
reading scores when combined with high stakes
testing.
When the latest
scores of our country's national
reading test arrived this spring, they were as depressing as usual: Two - thirds of American fourth - graders, according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress, can not
read at grade level.
Peterson does observe that blacks and Hispanics increased their
test scores substantially in
reading in the 1970s and 1980s — but neglects to mention that this was precisely the period
when our nation's schools were substantially more integrated than they were before then or since.
I find that students in district schools do better
when charters open nearby: students in these schools earn higher
scores on
reading and math
tests and are less likely to repeat a grade.
Students whose middle schools started one hour later
when they were in 8th grade continue to
score 2 percentile points higher in both math and
reading when tested in grade 10.
When reform - friendly commenters and cheerleading journalists write about the NOLA transformation, it's become de rigueur to offer a standard qualifier — words to the effect of, «We still have a long way to go, but...» In this formulation, poor overall
reading and math proficiency based on standardized
test scores is a mere speed bump before long and laudatory discussions of the remarkable growth demonstrated by the city's charter schools and students since Katrina.
Moreover, ACT Inc., which began measuring college readiness as the American College
Testing Program in the 1950s, reports that among the college aspirants who took its admission exams last year, only 21 percent of the graduating seniors attained
scores high enough in all four subjects — English,
reading, math, and science — to indicate that they wouldn't need to take a no - credit remedial course
when they entered college.
When student
test scores on the Ohio Academic Assessment indicated that only 33 % of Jones sixth graders were at the minimum state acceptance rates, middle childhood education students at Lourdes College stepped in to volunteer an hour each week to work with the sixth grade students to improve their
reading proficiency.
When your third grader just isn't up to par with
reading comprehension (you know that he or she is struggling because of a lack of interest in books, poor
test scores, and teacher input) what are you supposed to do about it?
In your article around Baltimore's technology gap («Computer - based
tests a challenge for low - income students, some Baltimore teachers say,» April 22), we
read that students who took the PARCC
scored lower
when they took the
test on a computer than
when...
The
scores for high school seniors haven't improved at all since 1992,
when reading tests were first administered.
Today is day two of of the three - day New York State English Language Arts Exam and in my ten - plus years of proctoring and
scoring these exams, it never ceases to amaze me
when, just a few minutes into the
tests, students» eyes start to glaze over and their bladders and throats go into overdrive, causing... Continue
reading Students: You Take the
Test; Don't Let the
Test Take You!
When Adamowski left his post last year, Hartford School Board member Robert Cotto Jr. wrote in the Hartford Courant that «
Test score improvements in math and
reading were inconclusive.
When tested with 283 children without disabilities and 636 children referred for special education evaluation, the WISC — III PS factor made no contribution to the prediction of WIAT
reading scores beyond that provided by FSIQ (Glutting, Youngstrom, Ward, Ward, & Hale, 1997).
When over 80 % of our children can not read proficiently by the third grade, it is a travesty of enormous proportions, particularly when compared with the TAKS reading test results (even after a significant standard deviation adjustment), their comparison with national norm - referenced test scores, and the wide gap between scores of white and minority child
When over 80 % of our children can not
read proficiently by the third grade, it is a travesty of enormous proportions, particularly
when compared with the TAKS reading test results (even after a significant standard deviation adjustment), their comparison with national norm - referenced test scores, and the wide gap between scores of white and minority child
when compared with the TAKS
reading test results (even after a significant standard deviation adjustment), their comparison with national norm - referenced
test scores, and the wide gap between
scores of white and minority children.
When we've taught students in ways that enable them to
score high on accountability
tests, but in the process have made them scurry away from math or feel repelled by
reading, have we educated those students properly?
While Singapore, South Korea, and Japan
scored highest, U.S. students ranked 18th — notably higher than expected
when compared to students in other countries who show similar performances on the PISA
tests assessing mathematics,
reading, and science.
When Sara Neufeld wrote in The Hechinger Report last year that Newark's Quitman Street Renew School had the greatest
test score gains in
reading of all 45 elementary and middle schools in Newark the prior spring, we at Education Elements saw it as triumph.
When students participating in dual - language programs have been followed across time, the research has shown they
score as high (or higher than) typical native English speakers on difficult, national English
reading exams, which
tests curricular mastery in all subjects combined.
Although No Child make requires states to improve graduation rates and
test scores — including the aspirational goal that all children (and actually, based on safe harbor and other caveats, 92 percent of them) are proficient in
reading, math, and science — states are given plenty of leeway
when it comes to interpreting how to meet certain requirements (like the one assuring that all teachers be «highly qualified» for instruction) and develop their own solutions in order to achieve them.
As far a performance goes, the HCZ Promise Academy high school may have decent state
test scores, but
when it comes to national
tests they only had on the ACT a 20 in Math, a 15 in English, a 15 in
Reading, and a 17 in Science.
But since 1988,
when education policy shifted away from desegregation efforts, the
reading test score gap has grown — to 26 points in 2012 — with segregated schooling increasing in every region of the country.
When young children miss too much school, it is often linked with long - term
reading problems, lower
test scores and weaker social - emotional skills.
The two sub-groups of students who showed the most improvement in
reading were students for which federal government intervention is the least justifiable: students who did not come from SINI schools and students who were in the top two - thirds of the
test -
score distribution
when they entered the Program.
The study found increased
reading achievement for a subset of students (students from schools not in need of improvement and students who were already
testing in the top two - thirds of the
test -
score distribution
when they entered the program) but not for students from schools in need of improvement, which the program specifically targeted.
Harvard researcher Brian Jacob (2002), for example, conducted an in - depth analysis of
test scores in Chicago Public Schools during a period (1993 — 2000)
when student achievement increased by.30 standard deviations (12 percentile points) in mathematics and.20 standard deviations (8 percentile points) in
reading.
Standardized
test scores in
reading and math also have improved significantly in both sectors, with charters leading the way at a time
when curricula have been enriched and after - school options expanded in both D.C. charters and DCPS.
The announcement comes a week after a fresh set of National Assessment of Educational Progress data, for 2013, showed no change in high school seniors» average
scores in either
reading or math, as compared with 2009,
when 12th graders were last
tested.
And
when students eat breakfast, the results are pretty spectacular: Improved academic performance on standardized
tests Improved concentration and memory Better math
scores Better attendance and fewer tardies Fewer trips to the nurse's... Continue
reading →
The conclusion was that
test scores in
reading and mathematics in the two sectors were very similar,
when adjusted for student characteristics.
For years, critics of
test - based school accountability have pointed out that
when schools face pressure to raise students»
scores in math and
reading, they tend to respond by doubling down on those two subject areas and cutting back on the teaching of history, art, music, civics, and more.
Nineteen countries and education systems
scored higher than the United States in
reading on the 2012 Program for International Student Assessment, or PISA, up from nine systems
when the
test was last administered in 2009.
New York City, for its part, had some reason to celebrate last week
when the state released
test scores showing that city schools for the second year in a row surpassed state averages in
reading performance.