Sentences with phrase «readings on the subject suggested»

Sure, I wanted to give my son the best nutrition possible, but my scattered readings on the subject suggested that four months would imbue him with all necessary immunities and superpowers.
Along those same lines, much of what I've read on the subject suggests that a substantial majority of TFA candidates do not make the commitment to teaching necessary to work at it over the years, improving with each school year and group of kids.
Many of the posts i have read on this subject suggest digital is best, because it's binary data, therefore the correct bits are there or they aren't, and as a consequence, the signal is perfect or it isn't.

Not exact matches

And in telling me I am wrong, you are also suggesting that you know more than the world's foremost expert on this subject, and more than the dozens of scholars (both secular and religious) whose works I have read over a period of more than three decades.
David Grissmer and his colleagues are producing a series of studies that suggest how much later success in math, reading, and science depend on early acquisition of the kind of «general knowledge» and fine - motor skills learned through art and other subjects.
I suggest to read more on this subject because it is very interesting and also vital for all drivers.
The following article from another Lab site is a good read on this subject (ignore the article title, I'm not suggesting you shouldn't get the puppy, it's just the article contents is a good read): http://www.thelabradorsite.com/should-you-get-a-labrador-if-you-work-full-time/
As someone who recently started as well, I suggest keeping things simple: read as much as possible on the subject, whether on my website or others.
It's you who is not reading, I didn't say that NASA article «falsify s» ACC, the topic is about this «loudness» you mentioned, what I said was that mainstream media «loudly» publicizes less definitive studies that suggest ice receding or sea level rise, but a more definitive study like that one (which used satelites) is not reported on because it is inconvenient for their overall simplistic view on the subject.
I would suggest that you dig up some texts on the subjects, and read them.
I have read sufficient on the subject of the timing between the onset of a solar magnetic minimum and global temperatures that I am willing to play devil «s advocate and argue against anything that anyone suggests is true.
In order to try to satisfy your totally illogical blind spot on this subject can I suggest you read «Climate history and the Modern World» by Huber Lamb or «History and Climate» by Phil Jones / A Ogilvie / T Davies and Keith Briffa?
If you want to know more about my opinions on the Heartland / Gleick subject I suggest you read this and this.
Lots of friends and relatives do not have the time or intrest to read a full book on the subject like Weart's «The Discovery of Global Warming» so might I suggest that this article be converted into a PDF for referal.
For a fresh take on the subject, by someone comparatively new to the role, I would suggest reading the chapter «Working for Legal Publishing Companies» by Danann Hawes in the book Legal Information Specialists: A Guide to Launching and Building Your Career, edited by Annette Demers and published by LexisNexis in association with the Canadian Association of Law Libraries.
89 Edwards, supra note 3, at 160 (suggesting that subject line should «state the email's subject and purpose in terms that will be specific enough to communicate well but not too detailed to be read at a quick glance»); Chew & Pryal, supra note 23, at 136 (urging use of «short yet informative» subject lines and suggesting that «eight words is approximately the maximum number of words that most smartphone email clients can show on their screens»); Shapo, supra note 4, at 343 (recommending «treating your subject line as a brief summary of the message»).
First and foremost, if you don't know much about bitcoin, I suggest you get up and start reading and watching a lot of videos on the subject.
The female orgasm is also fairly distinct from the male orgasm (though on some accounts similar to the male's experience of prostate massage) in the capacity to experience something like an external and internal, or a deep and shallow, type of orgasm, which is in part related to where and how the clitoris is stimulated, and in part to the mental state of arousal at the time (I don't have the time to find the reference now, but recently I read of a study that seemed to suggest that more female subjects experience the deeper form of orgasm in longer - term intimate relationships than in casual encounters, which seems intuitively right but certainly bears closer study).
If you want to read a very insightful blog on the subject of how to invest as risk free as possible in this current market I would suggest reading this blog post... It has tons of great nuggets!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z