Sentences with phrase «reads on screen much»

Not exact matches

The first is just the observation that I bought what amounts to a 1.5 million dollar laptop screen with bitcoin back when it was a newfangled science project, much like the million dollar pizzas one reads about on the web.

equipped with an easy - to - read LED screen that shows how many calories you've burned, how much time you've spent on the treadmill, distance, time, and other indicators of your fitness performance;

It makes all the difference — I can think through the comments so much better when the photo is right up on the screen while I read!

Fling - and the obvious first choice in our list of the best dating apps.It might work on a dating website where that much information would presumably be read on a larger screen, He was also a reporter for The Philadelphia.

It might work on a dating website where that much information would presumably be read on a larger screen, but its overkill on an app, and the amount of scrolling.

My goal is now to read the third book in the trilogy MOCKING JAY so as to help aleviate some of the suspense of what happens next to these characters I've invested so much time with both on screen and off.

Use Sans Serif fonts such as Arial, Veranda, or Tahoma for body content and subheadings since these are much easier to read on screens.

We can't get much further away from reality than reading about it on paper or screen.

Screening data show that only 39 percent of ninth - graders read at or on grade level, «very much mirroring what we knew about our middle school students, says Annie Wolfe, secondary curriculum and development officer.

Instrument panel layout was superb: one of the gauge faces worked as a mini-nav screen, which was handy, while another gave you a read - out on how much battery power was being consumed or recaptured, via braking, for example.

And after awhile I can no longer focus on a screen, but I can read a book much longer than I can read a computer screen.

It is a superior reading experience, much more convenient than traditional vertical page modes on bigger screens.

Anecdotally, students have told me they prefer reading for pleasure on paper because they spend so much time on screen that it shifts them into a more relaxed frame of mind.

With so much reading going on, it's possible that print books are preferred for another completely practical reason: reading on screens tires out your eyes much faster than reading on paper.

«I love reading ebooks, but as an obsessive, pedantic designer type, I couldn't help thinking that the actual experience of reading a book on a screen, although good enough, could be so much better.

«Real» cameras are still much better than in - phone cameras; the right device to carry in your pocket, as a phone or PDA, will always be worse to read on than a device with a bigger screen, which in turn is too big to fit in your pocket; keyboards are simply better than little thumbpads for entering more than a few words, and any device with a real keyboard has to be a certain size.

Reading text on a screen has always been a little hard and disorienting for me, and a tiny e-book reader screen, smart phone or whatever doesn't help much.

If you are reading using the Kindle app, there is only so much text that be displayed on the screen at any given time.

The other factor to consider is that when it comes to periodical reading (newspapers and magazines), the advantage of having more text and images on the screen is a nice perk, but the reading experience isn't enhanced as much as you might think.

The two - page spread is too small to read comfortably on my Mac (which has a 15 ″ screen), the single - page option enlarges the page so much I have to scroll down to read it, and the «smart panels» option (which pans from panel to panel) makes me seasick.

while on the other end, it has a 9.7 - inch 1200X825pixels sunlight - readable e-reader screen with e-Ink technology that makes e-book reading a much pleasurable experience.

So yes, it may share the same capabilities as a cell phone, but the WiFi can come in handy when something is much more difficult to read on your phone's smaller screen.

The small 6 - inch screen size is always a limiting factor when it comes to displaying PDFs on a Kindle — a device like the Onyx Boox M96 with 9.7 ″ screen is much better suited for the large size of PDFs — but the Kindle Voyage has an advantage with its high resolution 300 ppi screen that helps make small text appear clearer and easier to read.

The Kindle and ePub versions are much easier to read on a small screen device.

When I'm playing chess on my Paperwhite, I stare at the non-moving screen as much as I do when reading.

Unfortunately, the PR was very misleading: one doesn't find out until the device is in hand that it is impossible to annotate PDFs, or to resize PDFs properly for easier reading (pinch to expand results in wild and uncontrollable resizes, e.g. 200 - 300 x, that run off the screen, and there is much delay, choking, flashing, etc.) As such, the device was worthless to me, but the company's website provided no info on how to handle returns.

With margins optimized to fit as much content on each (out of the box), how much more reading per page can I get with a bigger screen?

Six inch devices are great for travel but for long reading sessions curled up in a chair — the reading experience on the larger screen is much more enjoyable.

Ebooks, on the other hand, well, they're pretty much the same thing as physical books, except they need an expensive device to read them on, while books have their own built - in screen that is both disposable and of a superior resolution (no back - lighting though).

In all cases, E Ink is much easier to read in bright sunlight, while color touch screens on tablets tend to wash out, and their glossy displays can show distracting reflections.

I'm considered somewhat of a trailblazer in the digital world but I still much prefer to hold a printed book in my hand than to read one on a screen.

I haven't read a comic book on an ereader, except once and I gave up on it... The Kindle Readers are very difficult to work with... 6 ″ is way too small a screen, plus the delay to zoom in to read the dang thing just takes too much effort.

Reading during daylight is much more manageable with brightness settings, but still eInk screens are 1000 easier on my eyes.

My Oasis has a bright white glow when I read it after 11 pm, but the Aura H2O's screen turns a dark orange, which is unattractive, but much easier on the eyes in total darkness.

The iPad Air 2 does offer the anti-reflective coating on the screen that makes its display much easier to see when out in the sun — great if you like to read while lounging out on the patio.

Photo: LCD versus E Ink ®: The E Ink display on a Sony Reader (bottom) is much sharper and easier to read than a typical LCD screen (top).

In the absence of solid proof that LCDs are just as good as eInk when it comes to reading LCD lovers will just have to accept that a lot of people don't like reading on LCD screens, that they experience real eye strain when reading on LCD screens, and for them eInk is much better than LCDs.

The words on the Kobo screen are so much more easier to read than on the Kindle screen.

These devices» screens use much less energy, and many people find them easier to read, so there will be folks who will be viewing your beautiful, fully saturated snapshot as if it were being displayed on a 1984 Macintosh.

Reading books on the DX is even easier, because with the much larger screen surface, you don't have to turn the page as often as you do on the Kindle 2.

At the end of the year it wouldn't be a surprise to see a $ 125 Kindle 3 with pretty much the same features as Kindle 2 plus the new eInk Pearl screen and a $ 250 to $ 299 super Kindle that adds on a lot — including, perhaps, the ability to do more than just read.

It also found that «those who read only on - screen are also three times less likely to enjoy reading very much (12 % vs 51 %) and a third less likely to have a favorite book (59 % vs 77 %).»

Though I'd much rather read a book on a 7 - inch tablet, for movies and games, a bigger screen is always better.

My only gripe about the Kindle Fire is the same gripe I have with all LCD - based tablet computers being marketed as e-readers: most people find LCD screens tiring on the eyes, and would prefer the reading experience on an e-Ink screen (which is easier on the eyes, visible in bright sunlight, and allows for much longer battery life).

As for reading on the iPad, some people swear they like it as much as reading on an e-Ink screen.

The e-Ink screen, which isn't very good for games or Internet surfing or movies, is much easier on the eyes than an LCD screen, especially when reading for long periods or reading in sunlight.

This big screen makes reading e-books much easier than on smaller screens, reducing the number of page turns.

Unfortunately, the units at Target are just demo units that aren't fully functional, so I couldn't play around with the functionality much or read on it or comment too much on the new e-Ink Pearl screen.

This often makes reading PDFs on smaller 6 - inch screens problematic — a device like the Onyx Boox M96 with its 9.7 - inch screen is much more effective for displaying PDFs, especially since it was designed for it.

If, as Amazon claims, the big - screen Kindle e-ink reading experience is so much better than reading books on a phone, then why bother crippling the phone reader?»