Sentences with phrase «real gdp»

«they have 11 - 12 % GDP growth and 7 % inflation, so despite the talk of how the place is booming, I suspect it is concentrated in the coastal cities and not widely shared, since real GDP growth isn't all that robust by emerging economy standards»

Getting real GDP growth of 2 1/2 % over one's lifetime if remarkable.

Given the U.S.'s mature economy and the increased level of global competition, Buffett and Munger think real GDP growth of 1 % is all you can expect.

A lotta things weren't secured and flew through the metaphorical windshield, including the bond market, real GDP, unemployment, and Carter's re-election chances.

5) I would tell them that changes in inflation and real GDP don't have as large of an impact on corporate profits as is commonly thought, both positively and negatively.

Given that the size of the U.S. economy, in real GDP terms, is over 3x what it was 40 years ago, this is a remarkable and frightening state of affairs.

Will we get a 10 % decline in real GDP?

Real GDP is growing at a decent clip, but fitfully, and it is still not up to pre-crisis levels.

In the ISM June report, the ISM Manufacturing Index and the Non-Manufacturing ISM Index both accelerated to levels historically associated with higher real GDP growth going forward.

In the 11/90 -3 / 00 bull, real GDP grew at 3.5 %.

As shown, the level of real (inflation adjusted) margin debt as a percentage of real GDP has reached levels only witnessed at the peaks of the last two financial bubble peaks in the U.S.»

Isn't that a richer view than trying to analyze whether the US will have two consecutive quarters of negative real GDP growth?

Will real GDP growth remain positive?

In 4Q 2010 real GDP rose 3.1 %, while real Gross Domestic Purchases fell 0.2 %.

Well, that's 25 years in the rear - view mirror, but perhaps I can contribute something on the current Real GDP figure.

In summary, the reason the 3.3 % real GDP number looks weird is that imports have a negative weight in the GD Product price index, so a large move up in energy prices (largely imported) makes the GDP product price index go down, and real GDP go up.

The following table illustrates our insight, showing that inflation and real GDP growth are, in fact, major drivers of the three - month Treasury bill rate.

The economy is projected to operate slightly above its potential over the next three years, with real GDP growth of about 2 % in both 2018 and 2019, and 1.8 % in 2020.

The trouble is that import price increases increase real GDP relative to real GD purchases.

Soon our policies will restore robust real GDP growth, produce inflation and then we will tighten policy and restore normalcy.

[By comparison, 10 - year USTs offer a princely 1.98 % — still a disturbingly low yield for an economy that's supposed to clock up 2.5 - 3.0 % real GDP growth in 2015].

But my main objection comes from a stock picking perspective & is perhaps better served with an example: Let us presume you find two VERY SIMILAR & CHEAP high quality / growth stocks (regardless of market cap) in two different markets — one growing at 2 % real GDP, and the other at 7 % real GDP — which stock would you buy?!

With the bank stress tests, the adverse scenario posited higher unemployment, lower residential housing prices, and lower real GDP than «baseline» estimates.

Some say that it is a 10 % decline in real GDP.

Real GDP Growth is a macroeconomic measure of the value of economic output adjusted for price changes (i.e., inflation or deflation).

Real GDP grew by 2.4 % in the first quarter but is estimated to have contracted by 1 % in the second quarter, pulled down by volatile trade flows, uneven consumer spending, and the Alberta wildfires.

In the long run, the natural real interest rate is the real GDP growth rate less a savings factor.

The higher consumer and investment spending results in real GDP being $ 9.6 billion higher by the end of the forecast period than it would be without the ORPP.

They will also have to figure out what comes first if there is a broader banking solvency crisis, and / or significant shrinkage of real GDP with a rise in unemployment.

For example, Canada saw year - over-year growth in real GDP last year of 1.3 per cent.

Statistics Canada said Tuesday that real GDP grew at an annual pace of 2.4 per cent in the first quarter.

Statistics Canada said real GDP rose 0.6 per cent that month, boosted in part to non-conventional oil extraction as production in the Alberta oilsands region started to resume.

Meanwhile, the Conference Board of Canada suggested Canada could see real GDP growth of 2.4 % in 2014 and 2.6 % in 2015 — assuming strong growth in the U.S.

Canadian real GDP should...

In and of itself, QE did nothing but to provoke a decline in monetary velocity proportional to the expansion in the monetary base, with little effect on either real GDP or inflation.

When QE was pursued in Japan, it did nothing but to provoke a decline in monetary velocity proportional to the expansion in the monetary base, with little effect on either real GDP or inflation.

With real GDP expected at about $ 13,409 billion in 2005 dollars for the fourth quarter of 2010, the implied GDP deflator is 2000 / -LSB--LRB-.094 -.022 * ln -LRB-.15)-RRB- * 13,409] = 1.10.

Notice that nominal GDP is just real GDP («Y») times the GDP price index («P»).

Part of it, in my expectation, will come from real GDP growth that will be about a half percentage point faster than the 2.5 % expected growth in «potential GDP,» as I expect the current «output gap» to gradually close over the coming decade.

It also released better - than - expected 2Q15 real GDP growth at 4.9 % y - o - y.

Real GDP rising @ 2.5 % / yr vs real avg wages @ 1 % / y Jul 19, 2012

I'm in the weird spot of thinking that nominal economic activity is higher than expected, on both an inflation and real GDP basis.

In the 14 full calendar years since year - end 2000, real GDP climbed at just 1.8 % a year.

The potential level of real GDP for a nation is determined by the quantity and quality of its natural resources, the size and skills of its labor force, and the size and quality of its stock of capital resources.

GDP adjusted for price changes is called «real GDP.»

Real GDP per capita is a measure that permits comparisons of material living standards over time and among different nations.

A worksheet (and extension task) for students to act as the ONS and calculate price indexes, convert nominal GDP to real GDP, calculate GDP growth and GDP per capita.

And while U.S. real GDP has nearly quintupled since 1970, education achievement of 17 year - olds and high school graduation rates have remained basically unchanged over the same time period.

«Can we go all - out on efficiency and renewables * fast enough * to keep world (US) real GDP at least flat... and not end up, out of desperation, burning a lot more coal to keep the lights on and do CTL synfuels... with bad results.

Government has projected a real GDP growth of 6.3 percent; with oil for the year 2017, while non-oil real GDP growth is estimated at 4.6 percent.