While this may seem like a shock to you,
the real answer as to what the highest possible credit score is even more shocking.
And still
no real answer as to why your life is so miserable.
That's laughable too, but he is correct in claiming that science has
no real answers as to why we're here or why every culture in history has had a belief in a mysterious, unseen, omnipotent being.
Many people have a wrong view of history, God, and human nature so if you want
real answers as to why death, suffering, and evil exist read this http://www.answersingenesis.org/assets/pdf/radio/death-and-suffering.pdf
When you're stranded on a boat with no power, no running water, no food, and
no real answers as to when the situation will end, no one could blame you for wanting to get off the boat immediately and either go home or go somewhere else.
Not exact matches
That makes her
answer not just a handy way for young people
to gauge their readiness for the
real world, but also a thought - provoking read for parents
as well.
The
answer may lie,
as Roose suggests, in a path
to real benefits such
as those offered by the on - demand personal assistant application Alfred.
McKhann
answers frequently asked questions, from «S Corp or LLC»
to «Do I really need branding
as a
real estate investor?»
As a special bonus, attendees will also have the opportunity
to ask questions and receive
real - time
answers from the professional traders at MTG.
As the global
real estate director, you need
to create a bulletproof plan that quickly provides the business sectors the tangible asset they need
to produce revenue — and you
answer to the Board of Directors.
«Topic» is best thought of, in our experience,
as the best way
to successfully
answer real questions buyers have at that stage of the process.
In this case,
as you can see, Google understands your
real intent (you want
to know how much $ X are worth in euro) and offers
to give you the
answer in the search result.
If you can give
real answers to the vendors, your potential new clients, they will again trust you
as an advisor and a resource.
I won't be
as confident in the
answers as I would if I had
real - world experience working with this audience, but the process gives me a starting point
to create content without wasting time
answering dozens of demographic questions.
Non-asset holders were punished — their bank deposits now generate little or no income, and they were forced
to move into riskier assets, such
as stocks, bonds,
real estate, or «anything that offers some yield and is not bolted down
to the floor» (please see my
answer to What kind of market distortions does the Fed loaning out money at 0 % cause?).
The questions your organizations are attempting
to get
answers to can serve
as a guide
to know when you need the
real thing — true ethnographic based buyer persona research.
All the more reason, then,
to be grateful
to two Catholic University professors for having assembled a florilegium of brief texts from a century of Catholic social doctrine, and then artfully arranging them
as answers to the
real - world questions asked by business people trying
to live their professional lives vocationally.
I am looking for authenticity, relevancy, no ovewhelming bands that take away from the experience of worship, clergy who are willing
to answer my hard questions, who understand doubt is a stepping stone
to deepening my belief, who accept everyone
as Jesus did (and we know Jesus was a rebel who accepted and led all sorts of people), who don't feel the need
to try
to be hip, who speak about things without inserting politics, who are wiling
to trash the temple
to bring us back
to the truth, who will step out of the box of comfort and be
real.
Religion and god is often used
as a justification of prohibition and Silences Free Speech and stops humans
to seek for
real answers.
So I Listened
to all of his sermons read all of his blogs and than decided
to leave my number
to see if he would really call
as he says on his web site, With in 2 hours I recieved a call and DR. Collins never rushed me off the telephone
answered all my questions, And After just that one call you can tell he loves and believes in what he does, He wont be for everyone, Because he does talk about damnation and what it takes
to get
to heaven, And its not from giving ministers our money > I watched the you tube videos of many and he is just for me, everyone has a choice but in listening
to his sermons and reading his blogs and than the telephone call this guy is the
real deal.
Wonder and awe before the majesty of the Creator,
answering a high call
to service, being transformed by a Power greater than our own, being aware of a Presence in whose fellowship we find our strength, being reinforced by the divine help so that we triumph over trouble, opening our lives
to inspired hours when the best seems the most
real — all these are responses
to revelations of reality above and beyond ourselves, but nowhere is such revelation so compelling
as when it comes incarnate in a person.
Now if we regard all
real religions
as attempts
to get at a special kind of truth
to provide some
answer to man's intuitions about his own nature, we shall, I believe, find that what we know
as «Christianity» comprehends, develops and fulfills all that at heart we hold
to be true.
Only someone who overlooks the fact that this
answer itself has a
real history which is a history of the reality reflected on
as well
as of the reflection itself, can think that the Church with its principles, because they too can be given concrete form, is always able
to follow directly on the heels of what is new in the changing course of history and that only by its own fault and failure could the Church lag behind events in its theological reflection on morals.
He
answers no
real question in the above editorial
as the Redeemer Presbyterian still holds on
to the belief that Jesus is coming back.
Such a distinction has
real merit, but it does not
answer the question
as to whether there may not be other channels of «salvation» (in almost any sense that can be intelligibly specified) than that which stems from the historic events connected with Jesus of Nazareth.
In the absence of any
real answers I continue
to go and I continue
to speak
as gently and
as lovingly
as I can into impossible situations.
This
answer is not implied in the statement of the question,
as it might seem
to be, for God's relation
to man
as the eternal Thou which never becomes an It does not make any the less
real the «silence» or «eclipse» of God when He appears
to hide Himself and we cut ourselves off from relation with Him.
Here is the
real issue facing evangelical theology
as it seeks
to answer the women's question.
«But there is a
real problem with modern media requiring us
as politicians,
as leaders,
to give instant
answers to everything.»
The only thing,
as far
as I am concerned, that keeps us permanent is our belief in the value of goodness, and how we translate that into daily action, even across the boundaries of race, gender, class, and creed... That is
real permanence precisely because it does not,
as a form of consciousness, submit
to dogma that, with the way reality and history simply IS, or plays out, CAN NEVER give us all the
answers...
I said at the start that I felt myself
to be in a radically new situation in theology, encountering theological issues that seemed quite new and about which I felt little present clarity or
as yet little
real hint of an
answer.
to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly
to argue anything
as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always
answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree
to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is
real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is
real, provable, and most def.
but i didn't state anything example — i stated that the theory of evolution is yet
to be proved and so with that i agree that due
to that lacking it is equal
to the theory of god... the only thing i said which is cemented truth for anything is that we don't know what the
real answer is... and by stating ideas
as facts serves no
real purpose but a selfish one... lets call it an ease - ment on the inner self, the mind can now be at peace with the hope that when i die i get
to live yet again... full belief in this is insane without evidence.
But,
to answer your question... considering I've been focusing on the fact that verbal abuse is
real throughout this post... yeah, I sure
as heck do.
It has retarded the quest for securing women's rights by acting
as a cheap substitute for
real answers to the injustice women experience today.
His
answer to that question was that, while there is general agreement
as to what is wrong with the world, the
real problem is that we can not agree on what would be right.
These scientist, and doctors, can not remake skin, bone, eyes, brains, oval eggs, sperm, none of the sort, so they have no
real answer to create a life other than how procreation works, where again what, and how is the very first man, or woman, animal, other creatures, either in the sea, or creeping on this earth was originally created from,
as where did they first come from?
As to whether you believe in the
real God, I'm not sure what the
answer is, but I have a couple thoughts I'd like
to bounce off you.
The
answer to that question would be Yes if and only if all universals, including normative ones, are
real only in actual entities,
as abstractions from their whole concreteness.
Answer: A system of sup - ersti - tion miseducating our young into a warped sense of Reality and a severely impaired ability
to Reason, producing what many now call «Pseudo-Adults» who live among us, with just
as much voice, opinion, and power
as the
Real Adults in the room.
I cant praise God enough for the internet we cant be ignorant these if we want
to learn anything all we have
to do is
to jump on the internet for
answers since I have accepted Jesus
as my personal savior thirty five years ago i cant stop myself
to share my experience with people but since i lost my husband through a tragic accident my life took a different turn my savior became more personal and
real to me i give myself full
to the lord and the result of that people stat asking me for bible study which i have never done in my life so I decided
to search the net and i came across your website which put the whole gospel in a simple way and i am going
to use it for my first bible study and see how the holy spirit will lead from there.I came
to the conclusion that our trials is a blessing in disguise and i praise God for it.keep up the good work God bless Martina keep me in prayer please
I think my questions were more
to see if, by your
answers, I could show you that, if I am a nice person,
as nice
as most Christians, and if you aren't really sure about hell, sin, all the bad stuff in the bible, and if the only difference between me and you is evident when someone asks us if we are a Christian,... then why would you,... (I am putting words in your mouth, forgive me) why would you want me, or anyone,
to become a Christian, if that Christianity did not offer a
real beneficial difference between you, a Christian, and me, a non christian?
The
real answer,
as it so often is, came in the middle, with the Phillies getting a promising package of raw prospects from the Rangers that they had
to use their financial abilities
to help shake loose.
Are you brave enough
to answer by using your own
real name,
as I always do when I say something, and not hide behind a car makers name.
Journalists have
to ask in case you might get a
real answer or a boss who will ask why you didn't ask, but you also have
to expect a nothing
answer like this
as well.
They added Marco Estrada
to their rotation this winter in the Adam Lind trade, but he's no
real answer,
as he's never thrown more than 150 innings and isn't likely
to give up fewer home runs in everyone's favorite Canadian bandbox.
Real AFC supporters know that the A doesn't mean Arsene and they do not have
to make that joke
as they see how restricted Wengers powers really are, restricted
to knowledge and being the guy
to turn
to for
answers.
This is an incredibly difficult question
to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only
to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel
to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards
to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems
to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early
to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency
to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs
to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects,
as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious
to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox
as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise...
as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently
to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow
to ever boss the midfield and he tends
to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed
to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch...
as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready
to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him
to use Francis and then he had the nerve
to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary
to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed
to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends
to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little
to no sense considering what he has
to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in
Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford
to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try
to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards
to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part
as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair
to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went
to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had
to choose one of those 3 players
to stay on it would be Ox due
to his potential
as a plausible alternative
to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue
to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due
to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem
to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense
as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold
to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction
to heroin without the benefits
There is no
real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated
to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them
to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players
as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates
to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak
to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)
Time for some brutal honesty... this team,
as it stands, is in no better position
to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than
answers...
to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any
real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really wa
real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried
to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want
to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in,
as they seem
to have a pretty good history when it comes
to that position...
as far
as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment,
as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers
to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things
to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz
to the starting lineup due
to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition
to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB
to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need
to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need
to target a CDM then do whatever it takes
to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us
to become dominant again we need
to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper
to CB
to DM
to ACM
to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil
to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed
to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in
Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really wa
Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer
as a result of his presence on the pitch...
as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed
to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time
to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just
to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye
to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just
as much time on the training table
as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need
to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had
to wait so many years
to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes
to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes
to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk
to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went
to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest
to strikers who were clearly not going
to press their current teams
to let them go
to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants
to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due
to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore
as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately
to raise awareness for several years when cracks began
to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued
to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...