Next, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that immigrants with bad lawyers now have the right to appeal their deportations in
a real appellate court.
Not exact matches
«But there is going to need to be some major lawsuits or decisions by federal
courts,
appellate courts or more to decide what are acceptable practices online for a
real shift to take place.
The firm represents clients in a wide variety of litigation and
appellate matters, including matters involving
real property,
real estate finance, construction, development disputes and transactions, intellectual property disputes, business disputes, personal injury, fraud, shareholder disputes, and adversarial actions in bankruptcy
court.
Mr. Ross» extensive business litigation expertise includes matters involving unfair business practices and related business torts,
real estate disputes, partnership disputes, construction litigation, common carrier disputes and commercial litigation in state and federal trial and
appellate courts, as well as in alternative dispute resolution tribunals.
She is also experienced in handling
real property and UCC foreclosures, defending clients against lender liability, sham guaranty, and unfair business practices and specializes in enforcing and collecting judgments at both the trial
court and
appellate court level.
He has served as lead counsel in numerous jury and bench trials in complex commercial matters,
real estate disputes and,
appellate court actions.
Represented a national REIT in trial and
appellate courts, defending action for specific performance brought against it in connection with
real estate owned in South Carolina.
Mr. Cacace has represented clients in a wide range of matters in state and federal trial and
appellate courts, including business litigation, intellectual property disputes, product liability actions, consumer class actions, and
real estate disputes.
The conclusion of an
appellate court's term provides a target window for constitutional law specialists and others to dissect the latest rulings and explain what they mean in
real - world terms.
He has handled a wide range of matters in state and federal trial and
appellate courts, including white collar criminal defense, business disputes, and commercial
real estate cases.
Chris provides business and corporate advice, including advice related to sales and acquisitions, commercial leasing, contracts,
real estate conveyance and financing; broad commercial litigation representation including contracts and other business disputes, commercial and residential construction defect claims, religious entity law, advice regarding employment disputes and compliance, including ADA, ADEA, Title VII, Colorado Wage Act, FLSA compliance, and administrative proceedings before EEOC and DORA - Colorado Civil Rights Division; representation in administrative proceedings, C.R.C.P. 106 (a)(4) appeals and interlocutory appeals regarding governmental immunity, defense and pursuit of 42 USC § 1983 actions in federal and state
court; representation of public pension funds in litigation and administrative matters; and appellate practice before the Colorado Court of Appeals, Colorado Supreme Court, and the 10th Cir
court; representation of public pension funds in litigation and administrative matters; and
appellate practice before the Colorado
Court of Appeals, Colorado Supreme Court, and the 10th Cir
Court of Appeals, Colorado Supreme
Court, and the 10th Cir
Court, and the 10th Circuit.
Given that expression of public sentiment, which it is submitted is an obvious one, the Supreme
Court's judgments in Morse must raise
real questions of the ability of
appellate judges who are far removed from the day - to - day world of ordinary New Zealanders to interpret and apply statutes that are said to embody New Zealand values.
Anthony J. Scaffidi represents a wide variety of clients across numerous legal fields, including medical malpractice, personal injury, negligence, labor law,
real estate, corporate, and commercial law, as well as other complex litigation and transactional matters, at both the trial and
appellate court levels.
Lauren represents public and private companies and individuals in a broad range of matters, including business,
real estate, property development, construction and employment litigation in state and federal trial and
appellate courts.
Beyond his environmental practice, Derek also represents clients in a broad range of other business disputes, including employment class action defense, franchise, securities, corporate governance,
real estate, intellectual property and noncompetition litigation, before trial and
appellate courts.
Main areas of work Our global practice includes over 600 litigators with unmatched trial,
appellate and Supreme
Court experience; a preeminent securities law practice with over 130 lawyers; a regulatory practice that includes more than 110 lawyers who have held high - level government positions; an intellectual property practice enriched by the expertise of more than 170 attorneys and technology specialists who hold scientific or technical degrees; more than 200 seasoned corporate transactional lawyers and business counselors; and lawyers who focus on bankruptcy, environmental, labor and employment, private client,
real estate and tax matters.
The firm's practice areas include: banking and finance; corporate and securities; litigation and dispute resolution; antitrust and competition; US Supreme
Court and
appellate matters; employment and benefits; environmental; financial services regulatory and enforcement; government and global trade; intellectual property;
real estate; tax; restructuring, bankruptcy and insolvency; and wealth management.
In addition, our firm has considerable experience handling both trial and
appellate actions in federal and state
courts in the fields of civil litigation, including commercial law, tort law, elder law,
real estate, construction law and commercial
real estate transactions.
Prior to joining Brown Law Group, Mr. Cocanig worked as an attorney at Winston & Strawn in Chicago, IL where he represented clients in litigation and
appellate proceedings in state and federal
courts in banking,
real estate, and general litigation matters.
Although primarily a banking, business and
real estate lawyer, Bill has briefed and argued numerous
appellate cases in the U.S. Supreme
Court, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial
Court, the Massachusetts Appeals
Court and the Maine Supreme
Court.
The
appellate court found there was no
real good excuse why the amendment could not have been requested earlier.
Our authors are a unique alliance of lawyers, professional planners and environmental analysts who combine their decades of experience in land use,
real estate development, and property rights law with trial and
appellate court experience.
Prior to joining JMBM, Matthew worked for five years as an
appellate attorney in the Environment & Natural Resources Division at the U.S. Department of Justice, where he represented federal agencies in the federal
courts of appeals; for four years as an attorney at Paul Hastings, where he advised and represented corporate clients in environmental and
real estate matters; for two years as a law clerk to the Honorable Consuelo M. Callahan on the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; and for two years as a supervising attorney and lecturer at the Stanford Law School Environmental Law Clinic, where he taught students the practice of law and represented grass - roots and national organizations in environmental litigation and policy matters.
Experienced at prosecuting and defending
real estate and business claims in state, federal, bankruptcy, and
appellate courts across Texas.
A Louisiana
appellate court has considered whether a
real estate professional had a duty to notify the lender that the sellers had reduced the sales price, even after the lender had already completed its analysis of the buyer's eligibility for a loan.
An Ohio
appellate court has reinstated a lawsuit which alleged that a
real estate professional had breached her fiduciary duty by sharing confidential information with another client and this information helped that client successfully purchase the property.
A federal
appellate court has determined that a
real estate brokerage can be liable for the sexual harassment of a salesperson that the brokerage had treated like an independent contractor.
PITTSBURGH — A seller's
real estate professional can be held liable for damages by buyers who receive an inaccurate septic certification at settlement, a state
appellate court has ruled.
New York
appellate court rules that sellers» damages were not caused by the actions of
real estate professional and therefore dismisses the lawsuit.
A Mississippi
appellate court has ruled that no joint venture existed between a
real estate licensee and an investor when the two did not share profits or participate in equal management of a for - profit business enterprise.
Federal
appellate court determines that buyer had not demonstrated that the purchase of condo was connected to the
real estate management agreement.
A seller's
real estate professional can be held liable for damages by buyers who receive an inaccurate septic certification at settlement, a state
appellate court has ruled.
Georgia
appellate court affirms ruling that
real estate professional did not have a duty to alert former client that someone had called...
A California
appellate court considers the damages awarded to a purchaser who was told by
real estate professional that a strange smell was «sea air» but later turned out to be coming from a septic tank and an oil tank buried on the property.
The United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has joined two other federal
appellate circuits in rejecting the United State Department of Housing and Urban Development's («HUD») interpretation of § 8 (b) of the
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act («RESPA»).
A Florida
appellate court has considered whether
real estate licensees in the state owe their clients the common - law fiduciary duties if the licensee fails to provide clients a mandated disclosure form describing the duties of limited representation.
An Indiana
appellate court has considered whether a
real estate professional was properly held liable for failing to tell purchaser all of the information he knew about an easement on the property that his client was in the process of acquiring.
In 1999, a Louisiana
appellate court recently considered whether a relocation company could be considered a seller of
real estate.
A California
appellate court has considered whether an individual could challenge a lower
court's determination that he ratified a fraudulent transaction relating to property he owned when a friend /
real estate salesperson forged a deed transferring the property's title from the individual to the salesperson.
A federal
appellate court has considered whether a developer violated the
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act («RESPA») when it offered a buyer a discount on closing costs if the buyer used an affiliate of the developer.
Creating a circuit split between federal
appellate courts, the Second Circuit has ruled that
courts are required to defer to United States Department of Housing and Urban Development's («HUD») interpretation of section 8 (b) of the
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act («RESPA») regarding a lender's mark - up of a third party's fees when no additional...
A Florida
appellate court has considered whether two
real estate licensees were properly disciplined by the state
real estate commission.
A federal
appellate court has considered whether a general partner in a partnership formed to develop
real estate violated his fiduciary duty when he excluded his partners from a subsequent transaction.
This recent decision from a California
appellate court is certain to worry that state's commercial
real estate community.
An Illinois
appellate court has considered whether a buyer could claim specific performance of a
real estate contract based on a right of first refusal the parties had agreed to negotiate but had never reached an agreement on its specific terms.
A Georgia
appellate court has considered whether a
real estate broker who was selling properties in a newly - developed subdivision was required to disclose to buyers that their home was 119 square feet smaller than model home.
A Kentucky
appellate court has ruled that a
real estate licensee did not guarantee the quality of a pest control company when the licensee recommended the pest control company to a buyer.
A New Jersey
appellate court upheld discipline imposed by a
real estate commission on licensees for their role in selling a new home to a second buyer before the underlying transaction had closed.
A federal
appellate court has considered whether a modification to a
real estate partnership agreement altered the initial agreement's requirement that the partnership would end after 30 years.
A North Carolina
appellate court has considered a prospective purchaser's breach of fiduciary duty lawsuit against a
real estate brokerage.