It seems as if your only
real argument here is that one can not mark - up a PDF (which is actually not a completely true statement, depending on what version of Adobe you are utilizing).
The real argument here is super amolded display verses the super LCD..
Warner at The New York Times understands
the real argument here is about women who feel put - upon by all the expectations associated with modern motherhood.
St. Mary's has
no real argument here - BYU was not a very good team but at the same time was also arguably the 2nd best team St. Mary's beat all year long.
This is played for laughs later in season, but the real comedy is how obvious it probably comes off to everyone watching that there's
no real argument here.
Not exact matches
In the
real world, we define fallacies for debate purposes and validating
arguments which is not happening
here in the forums with hateful trolls like you.
but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only
here for 30 years and god has been
here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my
argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter
argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to
real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on
real events from a
real historical person but not a magical being by any means!
What is most salient for the present
argument is that
here we see the tension that exists in the relationship between the virtual and the
real.
Here the
argument from uncertainty has
real validity.
OK,
here's one «
real argument»: under Arsene Wenger Arsenal play sumptuous football.
Whenever people disagree with eachother on
here the «FIFA isn't the
real world»
argument is used.
We don't buy the
argument that we should leave it to «parental choice alone»; experience in the
real world demonstrates (
here as in every other market that we know of) that some external quality control is needed if only to protect consumers.
The
real problem
here is that neither publishers nor most authors really believe the
arguments put forward in support of the idea that libraries boost sales.
So please from all of us
here at GamesNosh, don't use the deaths of
real people in your Twitter
argument about video games.
Scientific debate as seen
here on
Real Climate, with data certified by experts to support
arguments, in completely unknown.
thanks all you scientists
here for all those great fake
arguments and graphs and stuff — you almost had me believing AGW was
real!
So, in case there is now or there will be some newbie to these
arguments who may have been confused by the disinformation you (and Memphis) have been producing
here,
here is an example from a genuine study to remind of what the AGWSF fisics passes off as
real physics, as used generally in all the variety of science studies because this has been introduced into the education system and, apart from the applied scientists in the field who can spot this is fake, the majority simply take it as if
real physics basics:
If someone
here with some
real knowledge have a good
argument for why my reasoning was flawed, I'd like to know.
Whilst a few simpletons may be swayed by your
argument, I predict that this latest example of extreme variablity in our weather patterns, even predicted by some scientists as a consequence of global warming, will not shift the near unanimous body of opinion of the world's scientists that global warming is
real and that it is
here now.
Most of the good in the world will not be accomplished by comments and
arguments printed
here — it will be done via
real, direct, sincere actions and connections.
First, the court found that the provision requiring
real estate licensees to deliver agency contracts at signing to clients is a provision for disciplining licensees, not voiding contracts (click
here to read a similar
argument rejected by a New Jersey court recently).