Sentences with phrase «real argument seems»

Your only real argument seems to be «he's english, so he's over-rated» while neglecting the fact that he's had two very productive seasons for a young player.

Not exact matches

A bigger problem is that cynical pols like Romney (and Michelle Bachmann on this issue) end up feeding into this self - defeating narrative because it seems easier than making a real argument about health care or taxes or what have you.

In order to have any hope of winning the debate, defenders of unborn life must understand how an argument that seems wholly reasonable to us can strike our opponents as a bizarre (therefore religious) doctrine wholly unconnected to the real world.

O'Hara makes a compelling argument that circumcised intercourse may frustrate the primordial subconscious that seems to know «real sex ain't this way.»

While it's true that, by all accounts, this behavior seems to extend directly from the ADD / overcompensation / showbiz - impresario persona he maintains in real life, that of a man who never outgrew directing Super Bowl commercials, it's hard to imagine an argument for a good movie to emerge unscathed from this crippling set of liabilities.

I'm talking about real TV & real media that's good enough for people to spend good money on and you're argument seems to consist of conveniently mixed up figures between YouTube (where you can watch 100,000 different cats next door falling of a skateboard) and fledgeling real content streaming services (that don't even need Flash) for their minority of TV viewers.

It seems to me that in decades past, an author interview almost always included some story of the writer's closeness to either an editor, an agent, or both — patience worn thin, arguments that broke through to epiphanies, real influence on the work by these representatives, whose business, then, lay so much closer to the writing, itself.

While there are valid arguments at this time as to whether one should rent or own their primary residence given the absurd amount of debt most are carrying on their principal residence along with artificially cheap money and the boomer influx about to hit the real estate markets across Canada over the next few years it would seem you are okay in that area.

Everything was fine with young pups playing in class and in parks, but with adolescent dogs, the scraps, the arguments, and even the play - fighting seem all too real.

The two most common arguments against warming theories seem to be (1) local temperature variations (or mutually - inconclusive data) disprove global warming itself; and (2) models aren't real science, anyway, so we don't need to worry about them.

But hypotheses have to be backed by hard and real data and not arguments that seem plausible.

In fact I think you see it surfacing now with some commentators accepting the arguments now being heard from Roger Pielke Jr that the obsession with scepticism holding back action is a real waste of time that seems only designed to both give excuses for the failures, and sense of purpose to alarmists.

However your arguments do seem to support the notion that your real mission is to protect the government gravy train that funds your «research»

If that is the case, then you should do your best to disabuse them from the idea that there has been no warming in the 20th century, and point them to the real argument, which now seems to be about «how much warming?»

Given all this it seems to me that anyone touting this as proof that «global warming is a hoax» completley misunderstands the process of scientific endeavor or has completely exhausted any real argument that rightfully brings into to doubt the reality of climate change.

Not everyone agrees with the idea of scheduling their Tweets with the argument that it lessens the conversation since it is not happening in «real time» and it seems more robotic.

But Louis Seidman, a constitutional law professor at Georgetown, seemed to take that argument in a new direction recently when he asserted in the New York Times that our Constitution is the real cause of our problems, and that we should get rid of it.

It seems as if your only real argument here is that one can not mark - up a PDF (which is actually not a completely true statement, depending on what version of Adobe you are utilizing).

How to think about marital conflict — especially those little (or big) arguments that never seem to go away — is a real challenge for my husband and I.

That is, it seems to me as if for that argument to be true (that wholesaling is tougher for a beginner because it requires those skills), it would also have to NOT be true for other forms of real estate investing, such as rehabbing.