Sentences with phrase «real as anything»

While Ho's video installation creates an experience as real as anything else, as a mediated experience it operates almost like a simulation of a Turrell piece.
It is rife with mystery and horror, yet it is able to capture an otherworldly beauty that leaves you with a feeling of deep enlightenment and seems as real as anything else.
In one of the strongest scenes in this final film, a character tells Harry about the importance of words and how things that exist only in the mind are as real as anything else.
Brain scans suggest that the visions induced by an Amazonian shamans» brew may be as real as anything the eyes actually see
Whether free will has some ontological reality or is entirely an illusion, as asserted forcefully by Wegner's masterful monograph, does not invalidate the observation that voluntary actions are usually accompanied by subjective, ephemeral feelings that are nonetheless as real as anything else to the person who experiences them.
The connection was as real as anything in the itinerant universe of professional sports could ever hope to become.
I accept that in your mind you friend is as real as anything you experience, but that doesn't mean it's real outside your mind.
The money is as real as anything else with a lot of benefits.

Not exact matches

Everyone has an office nemesis, though in real life, this fantastically annoying person rarely does anything as laugh - worthy as suspending your stapler inside a block of Jell - O.
At this point, I'm not saying yes or no to anything, but we've built our brand and our business around being honest and authentic and real, so for me, as long as we can find those things within that world, then yes we can make it happen.
valued as real money because they view anything else as a distraction.
And part of the problem is that there's no «real» or «natural» price for CEO labour (or for anything else), nothing to serve as a comparison point to figure out if such labour is being sold at the «right» price.
«Solar Roof was as «real» as anything he's ever shown [off to the public].
anything that is held as a store of value willingly can not be used to tie down the price level path (except via strong modeling assumption likes the last period exchange of real debt for real goods in the FTPL for example).
Instead of money, you might want to donate other items, such as anything from used clothing to real estate.
I think when there is a whole comprehensive real understanding of what renewables can provide as a viable long - term energy source, over the long term I don't see anything that changes the demand profile for solar in particular over the next 5 - 10 years.
I mention this as a pre-emptive strike against those who read what I am going to say about Canadian real estate and respond with: «This guy has no authority to say anything about real estate, he's never sold a house or developed anything
Non-asset holders were punished — their bank deposits now generate little or no income, and they were forced to move into riskier assets, such as stocks, bonds, real estate, or «anything that offers some yield and is not bolted down to the floor» (please see my answer to What kind of market distortions does the Fed loaning out money at 0 % cause?).
So long as you can profit while using the demo account on this platform, you can rest assured that operating a real traders» account will not be anything different.
Yeah, go back to your X-Box and let the real thinkers like DumbG there conjecture about all the things no one can disprove, for to truly disprove anything you need complete knowledge of everything in the universe, and since no human will ever achieve that, people like DumbG can tell as many unproven «truths» as they want.
If you are using «South Park» as your source of information on ANYTHING (religion or otherwise), then you forfeit your right to be taken seriously in ANY real forum for discussion.
He quickly makes it clear that he doesn't respect his parish priest, whom he derides face - to - face as «a 27 - year - old virgin» who doesn't know anything about the real world's problems and suffering.
The real issue under masquerade here as a legitimate scholastic question is really the issue of how can anyone «know» anything.
to ascribe anything but evil intent to the Pope's motives make one suspect that it is not one decision that is the real problem: it is really about the fact that the nature of Catholicism and the role of the Pope have at their core a claim so audacious as to provoke outrage.
The root of the problem as with all these young people supporting someone who didn't report a child assault to police is they don't see anything wrong with what these men are.So it's just a step down that it was done to a child, as they see nothing wrong with the acts between men.Be real, it's our culture now, they don't care about it being a child or not, it's sick and disgusting these young people are heartless and warped.
I don't see the value of the buttons as anything more than a general barometer of the general perspective of other readers... and without the ability to reflect both positive and negative there is no real value at all.
The concluding words of The Great Dictator are as revealing as anything of the real Charlie and his comic brotherhood.
Actual entities are the final real things of which the world is made, and Whitehead's ontological principle can be summarized as: no actual entity, then no reason for anything whatsoever.
«Time» doesn't exist as a real item that can «do» anything.
So Santa can look like anything any individual family likes... as long as there's a red suit and a white beard, even the Grinch (who is green... and also * not real *) got away with it.
Tommy God has already forgiven you for your sin the moment you asked Jesus into your life and confessed him as Lord.From that point he paid for your sin in full past present future.It is not sin that stops us from being with the Lord so you are saved.The problem you are experiencing is the battle for your life in the here and now satan is out to destroy you and he knows our weaknesses.If you are honest there were already issues in your life that you struggled with and never got the victory over.So where do you go from here as i found myself in the same situation i was a christian but walking according to the flesh.God does nt change his mind he always loves us but because of our choices we distance ourselves from God.The issue is that we like sin thats our wicked hearts and to be fair we cant change our nature only Christ can do that our old nature must be crucified with Christ.The stumbling block is our pride we have to admit that we cant do it For me that was terribly difficult i was so independent thinking i could do anything but the truth was a made a real mess of things.I sense you are at a crossroads and are feeling desperate and confused.So as a brother in the Lord you need to confess your sin to God and tell him that you are weak -LCB- we all are -RCB- and that you cant do it in your strength -LCB- None of us can -RCB- but ask him to send the holy spirit to help you deal with the temptations and the sin that you struggle with and he will help you to change your life he will empower you as he did me.Rather than look at who you are look to Christ and walk in him and he will make you a new man and sin will not have dominion over you.Jesus came to set us free from bondage.Having once been a slave to sin i know what it is like to have been set free by the power of God and that is what Christ is offering you today.All it takes is a desire to change or repent and admit we cant do it and trust him to give you the strength to walk in him regards brentnz
I do not mean, of course, to say anything so foolish as that language was not used for everyday things in the real world.
Once people accepted as an article of faith that modern science could explain the totality of our world, they had to say that anything which fell outside the scope of science isn't real.
Modern empiricism, on the other hand, which locates the possibilities of science in the brain (as if the brain and its patterns of order were not also in part a construction of the scientist's mind), precisely reverses this: the outside world known by the senses is alone the seat of what is — if anything is — universal, objective, real and certain.
My humble advise to you is to go and study the history that how, when and who wrote these chapters and what type of time it went through and then say that if there is any statement in this book is the real time statements of Jesus PBUH... please be honest with yourself... and don't do anything to please others but only you... and make sure you are convince with this study... whats the difference btwn what is in this book and what was written in a book last year when a Hindu claim himself as God and millions believed in him and still they believe even after his death by being ill... no one asks if I take a human as my God then how could he be ill or eventually be dead?
I guess I'll know it when I see it, but as of now, no one has ever presented me with anything that I can consider as actual, factual evidence that the God of the bible is real.
Here I am: with a real breathing metaphor of contentment and peace, with a milk - drunk, blissed - out, flour - sack of a baby, thick with goodness, and something breaks through the veil between earth and heaven, I understand down in my marrow and now I can't think of God as anything other than Abba.
Sir Julian Huxley, former UNESCO director, regards birth control as the only real hope in the problem and terms it «a prerequisite for anything that you can call progress and advance in human evolution.»
The theology of the place is as much about art and life as it is about spirituality and the real unsexy daily work of living, as anything else.
to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.
This is so, however, because anything we do to advance the real good either of ourselves or of one another is done quite literally to «the glory of God,» as an imperishable contribution to God's ever - growing perfection, which is, indeed, «the true life of all.»
but i didn't state anything example — i stated that the theory of evolution is yet to be proved and so with that i agree that due to that lacking it is equal to the theory of god... the only thing i said which is cemented truth for anything is that we don't know what the real answer is... and by stating ideas as facts serves no real purpose but a selfish one... lets call it an ease - ment on the inner self, the mind can now be at peace with the hope that when i die i get to live yet again... full belief in this is insane without evidence.
If this were so, we might suppose the senses to waken our attitudes and conduct as they so habitually do, by first exciting this sense of reality; but anything else, any idea, for example, that might similarly excite it, would have that same prerogative of appearing real which objects of sense normally possess.
If there was any real evidence for anything divine, you can bet those very same scientists would be testing, refining, and honing that evidence for their own benefit as well as for the benefit of others.
If God is indeed so conceived, then, to be anything real at all is either to be God or to be a creature of God whose difference from God can not be absolute; for to be absolutely different from God would be to be absolutely different from reality as such, and so not anything real after all, but simply nothing.
If condoms are 80 percent effective, shouldn't the Church» as her critics claim» be fully supportive of doing anything possible, including promoting condoms, as a real solution to stop the spread of HIV?
But my biggest problem with all these stories is with the idea of a god who generally tries to hide anything that could be seen as real evidence (because you need faith) and then slips up and shows it every now and then in very culturally and belief specific ways.
If God exist in the real world, then yes I will need at least enough proof of it as anything else that exist in the real world, If, however, God does not exist in the real world then no proof is possible or necessary.
Most suspect that there was a real person there, as there was likely a real Arthur upon whom the legends were built, but there isn't anything tangible to support his existence.
Christians: accepting gravity as real, only because they can't find a shred of anything in the Bible to challenge it.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z