Sentences with phrase «real bad returns»

And though the rating services compute their category averages as if these funds never existed, they of course lived real lives and collected money from real shareholders who earned real returns (or, should I say, real bad returns).

Not exact matches

The 1970s were the only decade where bonds did not deliver a positive return (real bond returns were significantly worse).

Further Reading: The Real Risks to a 60/40 Portfolio What's The Worst 10 Year Return From a 50/50 Stock / Bond Portfolio?

Beijing probably needed to do this for good political reasons — I suspect that there are many who would have strongly opposed a very weak ending for the Hu - Wen period of government — but the longer they keep this up, the worse the overall adjustment will be, and it will be politics that determines how quickly they can return to a real rebalancing of the economy.

He notes that real returns were even worse in the 1970's, due to a combination of tepid market returns and skyrocketing price inflation.

Given any positive inflation at all during the next few years, the real return on the S&P 500 in this decade through 2010 will probably be worse than the post-depression period, and about as bad as the 1970's.

From the acute algorithms of seasoned alpha - hunters to the bad actors promising big returns, it's easy to get lost in the noise and it's getting harder to understand the real profit potential.

The former Gold Cup Golden Glove winner would be perfect for a return to Chicago Fire, but a move west to Real Salt Lake or Portland Timbers wouldn't be bad either.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

Seen as a real - life version of the Bad News Bears, the Mavericks lasted three years before they were pushed out of Portland by the return of the major - league - backed Portland Beavers.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really wareal future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really waReal or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Kunis previously toyed with the length a little over a year ago when she rocked a faux version to the Bad Moms premiere, and although she returned to her long layers following the event, it certainly isn't surprising that the crop looks just as good when she went for the real thing.

Investing can give you a real financial boost, but returns are not guaranteed, and it's possible to earn less than you hoped, or worse - even lose money, especially in the short term.

If the 2015 Budget's assumed real investment returns of 3 % prove realistic, the projections suggest relatively constant minimum RRIF drawdowns up to age 94, and a lower risk of living to see a badly depleted RRIF account balance.

Worse yet, if the individual's portfolio is much like the 5 - year Treasury itself, the portfolio's real rate of return would be 0 %.

The poor returns in these markets were compounded by the appreciation in the Canadian dollar and if you take inflation into account, the real returns are even worse.

Whether you focus on nominal or real returns, stock investors experienced some really good and some really bad years over this period.

Conversely, the worse thing that can happen as you work through your Retirement Red Zone is to have a major market correction cause the sequence of return risk to become a very real threat to your income through retirement.

The current Shiller PE of 23.4 implies a real return of less than 0.9 percent per year for the next decade, with a best - case scenario less than 8.3 percent annually, and a worst - case scenario of less than -4.4 percent annually.

Timing and time of holding matter as much as anything in a historical perspective, and if you happen to become an adult at the beginning of a bad run, you may grow old before your investments recover (in real terms, the S&P had negative returns between 1997 - 2009).

For example, you can see in the period from about 1965 - 1982 when stock multiples were contracting in the U.S. that more and more large U.S. businesses were producing very bad real returns on equity.

Most companies would get worse real returns if inflation was higher.

The idea of a real competitive advantage — or «moat» — suggests that at worst the companies will grow with the economy and at best will continue to compound returns at a rate higher than their peers.

Thus you can buy bonds if you don't think inflation will be bad, or inflation - protected bonds if you can live with low real returns.

Mark couldn't find the bad apples, but he could alert readers to the newsletter's real returns, as opposed to results that had nothing whatsoever to do with reality.

Real Bonds didn't do too badly (I forgot to add its returns).

Is it fair to take from your Stock Return section, the «Worst Possible» 60 - year real stock return of 5.23 % and add the VII Advantage of 4.2 % per year from your July 23 post (I am using your Year 30 advantage as the same for my 60 Return section, the «Worst Possible» 60 - year real stock return of 5.23 % and add the VII Advantage of 4.2 % per year from your July 23 post (I am using your Year 30 advantage as the same for my 60 return of 5.23 % and add the VII Advantage of 4.2 % per year from your July 23 post (I am using your Year 30 advantage as the same for my 60 Years.

to equal a 9.43 % real return («Worst Possible») and therefore conclude that my 6 % target seems very doable?

The transaction costs and taxes and upkeep are extremelly prohibitive to good returns even when it's NOT the worst real estate market we've seen in decades.

So, when the most likely return is a negative 1 percent real, it is possible that we will see a return as good as 5 percent real or as bad as a negative 7 percent real.

The worst twenty - year real rate of return was 3.62 percent, which occurred during the twenty years ending November 30,1948.

As with scams under the names Shiukmoda Joji and Jyoung Chung Tu, it appears that this fraud is a set - up for a request to return real estate deal deposit monies paid with a bad cheque.

Internal rates of return for participating policies may be much worse than universal life and interest - sensitive whole life (whose cash values are invested in the money market and bonds) because their cash values are invested in the life insurance company and its general account, which may be in real estate and the stock market.

Hello I would like to share my master plan of new जीवन anand policy My age is 30 I have purchased 7 policies of 1 lac sum assured and each maturity year term 26 to 32 I purchased in 2017 Along with I have purchased 3 policies of same jivananad of 11lac each Maturity year term 33,34,35 Now what will I have to pay is rs, 130000 premium per year means 370rs per day At age of 55 in year 2047 I will start getting return, of, 3lac maturity per year till 2054 For 7policies of i lac I buyed for safety of paying next 10 years premium of 130000 As year by year my liability goes on decreasing and at the age of 62 to 65 I get my major part of maturity amount around 16000000 one crore sixty lac Along with 4000000 sum assured continued for rest of life So from above example it is true that you can make money to make money for you You can enjoy a large sum by just paying 370 per day and you will feel you have earned 19000000 / 35 years = 1500 per day And assume if I die after 5 years then in this case also my spouse will get 7500000 as death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term never.

So in USD terms BTC increased more than 100 % in the last 12 months but what if you traded in another currency, say the Brazilian Real In terms of the Brazilian Real you would have made a 134 % return not bad..

Every real estate investor knows how devastating bad tenants can be to returns.

Grocery - anchored centers built a reputation as the most rock - solid type of retail real estate investment, which throw off steady returns in good or bad times.

And for the privilege of paying some of the highest property tax rates in the country (we had 5 or 7 counties in the top 10 in the USA, last I checked) we have some of the worst schools in the state, no new «real» businesses, deteriorating roads, and receive no services (garbage, recycling, etc.) in return.

214 DOS 97 Matter of DOS v. Laymon - accounting to client; bad check; deposits; failure to pay judgments; proper business practices; jurisdiction; DOS retains jurisdiction after expiration of license (for failure to pay renewal fee) where acts occurred during licensure; violation of 19 NYCRR 175.1 by depositing clients» funds into operating account and failing to maintain special bank account; violation of 19 NYCRR 175.2 for failing to account to client; broker engaged in fraudulent practices by accepting monies he was required to retain in escrow, depositing said monies into his operating account, failing to return same to its rightful owner and by purporting to make refunds by issuing bad checks; in light of broker's financial inability to do so, failure to promptly satisfy judgments was not a demonstration of untrustworthiness; there was no violation of 19 NYCRR 175.3 (b) where broker was not managing rental properties; real estate broker's license revoked; reapplication for broker's license conditioned upon proof of payment of restitution with interest and proof of satisfaction of judgment with interest

Overall, real estate indicators are expected to be better than their 20 - year averages this year, except among the following indicators that are forecasted to perform worse: commercial property price growth, equity REIT returns, retail availability rates, and single - family housing starts.

This year appears to be on track to become the worst year on record for real estate investment returns, as measured by the NPI.

All real estate indicators are forecast to be better than their 20 - year averages in 2015, with the exception of four indicators expected to be worse — equity real estate investment trust (REIT) returns, retail availability rates, retail rental rate change, and single - family housing starts.