They are serious about renewable energy and
real carbon targets and the green economy.
Not exact matches
«A John Horgan New Democrat government will put forward a climate action plan before the next election that will have
real targets to cut
carbon pollution, with a commitment to meet them, and will have a plan to create many new clean technology and renewable energy jobs while protecting our existing industries from unfair competition.
There is a
real need to take action now in developing and adopting the new technologies to move to a more
carbon - efficient or
carbon - neutral future as we only have a limited window before reaching these warming
targets.»
And they urge the government «to show
real leadership and revise the
carbon target in line with the Paris Agreement (and on the basis of equity and the precautionary principle) as a matter of urgent and immediate priority.»
It accepts that global warming is
real and poses a threat to the Australian environment, but does not support mandatory
targets for reducing
carbon emissions.
Cities are at the frontline of the energy transition While countries and regions are setting grand
targets to curb
carbon emissions, the
real action will be taken in the world's booming urban centres 7 September 2016
China and India are building new coal - fueled power plants every week, and neither they nor any of the
real «developing countries» are required to commit to «binding
targets» for lower
carbon dioxide emissions.
«Without addressing land use change, the European Union's
target for renewable energy in transport may fail to deliver genuine
carbon savings in the
real world.
There is some
real interest in this approach, mainly from academics, and there is also what I would characterize as «strategic interest,» principally from those who recognize that once the focus is on
carbon taxes rather than other instruments, political debates will inevitably result in less ambitious
targets or, in fact, no policy at all.
With growing concerns about the greenhouse gas balance of many types of biomass and bioenergy — as well as effects on biodiversity, land use, and competition with food production — the EU needs to get policies right by capping the contribution of bioenergy to renewables
targets at sustainable levels, and promoting only bioenergy that is both sustainable and delivers
real carbon benefits.
We hope that the upcoming United Nations climate change summit in Copenhagen will follow this example and focus as much on bottom - up technological strategies for achieving
real reductions in emissions as it will on top - down
targets for
carbon caps.
Although the regulations would
target carbon dioxide emissions from coal - fired power, the
real risk in Wyoming was to coal mining.
A few noted skepticism of climate science, saying
carbon dioxide is «part of the cycle of life,» but for many opponents of the Clean Power Plan, the argument wasn't whether climate change was
real but whether the plan's
target on reducing emissions from coal power would effectively slow global warming.
19 - nation pledge would reduce coal use by 3 percent; COP23 failed to see developed nations ramp up
carbon targets, or offer
real pathway for financing climate aid to developing nations.