Sentences with phrase «real cases decision»

Not exact matches

3) The discussion about scaling vs. keeping it small is a very interesting one: I liked that the author presented real - life cases for either scenarios for food for thought instead of advocating one or the other (e.g. presenting a single «formula» as the golden rule that all shall follow)-- I can see how this particular decision can be case sensitive and there really is no «right» answer as long as it works for the entrepreneur!
While questioning the decision, one must look at why this case was brought in the first place, and their beliefs are likely not the real reason.
The real situation in which the Christian of today has to make his moral decisions is in any case such that in very many and very important instances, the decision can no longer be the simple and obvious application of the principles concerning essences, even if he respects these as absolutely and universally valid.
In many cases it [impeachment] will connect itself with the pre-existing factions... and in such cases there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.
much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..
@DavidGrinberg -(1) while a valid ethical point, this seems like such a rare edge case that in real life it would never affect any decision making by either side.
Because U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor sat on an appeals court which heard one of the lawsuits, she will likely recuse herself, leaving the real possibility that the case will receive a 4 - 4 decision.
The Independent Petroleum Association of America argued in a statement that the ICR «should have been a real opportunity for the decision - makers at EPA to better understand the complexities of the U.S. oil and natural gas industry» but that «ended up not being the case
The real - life Richard and Mildred Loving chose not to attend the hearing of their case before the Supreme Court; in telling their story, Nichols (who also wrote the screenplay) makes essentially the same decision.
But the groundbreaking decision in the Vergara case makes it clear that early, and effectively irreversible, decisions about teacher tenure have real costs for students and ultimately all of society.
In this webinar, our guests will discuss: • Decisions made prior to deployment • What Office 365 looks like for staff / students • Challenges / Solutions to fit K - 12 environment • Real world use cases • New levels of productivity — OneNote • Hardware in the hands of students
In this thesis, the ideas and concepts of Corporate Real Estate Management (CREM) are examined in terms of the contribution they could make to the process of accommodation decision by using recent cases in Dutch hospitals.
In case, the dog is suspected not to be functioning 100 % from health standpoint, then it will be a real wise decision to take an appointment from the dog's veterinarian immediately, without any delay.
It's definitely a serious challenge to make decisions on a case, especially when it will affect real lives.
In that case the real contribution is in the methods used and decisions made... and it is important to share the details of these so that the assumptions / decisions can be evaluated and so tests can be made of sensitivity to alternate choices.
I'm not sure how one would prove the case that IEA projections have shaped investment decisions, or show exactly how, but I haven't seen much real evidence offered one way or the other.
PARENTEAU: It's testing these theories which are very similar against a body of state law, in different states as you just mentioned, and so it's probing, it's trying to find a breakthrough case where you can find a state supreme court willing to make a really bold decision finding not only a right to a healthy environment, or a safe climate, stable climate, but also finding a duty on the part of the government to take real tangible action to address that.
No assessment can be all - encompassing in its treatment of climate - sensitive risks and decisions, but use of illustrative examples, case studies, and addressing classes of like decisions can provide real specificity (Kirchhoff et al 2013).
I don't doubt there's a real opportunity to apply the concept of «implied consent» in this case as it was set out by the SCC in the recent Trang decision.
The distinction between the varying approaches may be more apparent than real, and in many cases may lead to the same outcome particularly since not all courts distinguish between them and / or refer to them simultaneously.903 Of the few decisions where a foreign award has been refused enforcement pursuant to the second alternative of article V (1)(d), the party opposing enforcement brought evidence of fundamental or unjustifiable procedural defects that one could consider would have met the criteria of both approaches.
Maule doesn't advocate for teaching skills per se; rather, like Althouse, he endorses teaching about real cases, thinking about how how a particular analysis would impact clients or considering the ethics implications of a decision, instead of teaching ethics in the abstract, as a separate part of the curriculum.
I suspect that the real heavy lifting in enhancing access to justice is a matter of procedural reform — specialized decision - making bodies with extremely simplified procedural rules for specific civil law issues (something that actually already exists in certain areas such as Landlord / Tenant, but could be further improved upon), wider permissions for over-the-counter motions, fewer unnecessary court appearances, fewer procedurally - mandated appearances (e.g., going from a Case Conference to a Settlement Conference to a Trial Management Conference, and possibly further, before you can get to a family law trial), and so on.
The decision reviews related cases and the Underwood and Penner text mentioned above concerning real evidence.
The case method utilizes case studies, which are written primarily by Harvard faculty and generally feature a real, not fictitious, protagonist facing one or more critical business decisions.
What interests me is that the U.S. court decision is unlikely to have any real impact on the state of the law (though it may cause lawyers headaches in having to screen the large mass of cases), given the fact that the vast majority of cases are never cited more than a very few times — DNA lines, as it were, that die out as «unfit.»
In this case and in Christie (British Columbia (Attorney General) v Christie, 2007 SCC 21, [2007] 1 SCR 873), the SCC has shown a real reluctance to monitor the government's decisions with regards to the provision of access to lawyers.
But, the decision leaves Congress with the option of potentially changing that statute which currently limits the personal jurisdiction of federal trial courts to that of a state court of general jurisdiction in the same state, as it already does in cases that are predominantly «in rem» (e.g. interpleader cases and interstate boundary and real property title disputes), in bankruptcy cases, and with respect to the subpoena power of U.S. District Courts.
I've only quickly looked at the Arcon case, but it seems to apply to model contract forms, like those in use in the 1923 NSW decision of Real Estate Institute v. Wood.
Captorra's advertising intelligence will provide the data you need to make the most effective advertising decisions based on REAL case intake data.
Therefore, they play down the importance of real knowledge and expertise, derived from the inside and only make decisions based on the advice of clever, earnest but knowledge - free consultancy clones, quick to prove their cases by spurious research intended to confirm the decision first thought of.
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court (Phillips, Rodger, Hale, Collins & Kerr LLJ) reversed the decision in the Court of Appeal, finding that the English connections in this case were «substantial, if not overwhelming», and that there was a «very large disparity between what the husband received and what the wife received such as to create real hardship and a serious injustice».
Lighthouse offers unique reporting solutions that span from the initial collection all the way through to production, allowing you to make data - driven decisions in real time across all matters and cases.
However the case of Tapere and a limited number of other tribunal decisions (see, for example, Royden and ors v Barnetts Solicitors Liverpool ET Case no. 2103451 / 07) demonstrate the very real potential for large numbers of claims being brought by employees not prepared to move after a transcase of Tapere and a limited number of other tribunal decisions (see, for example, Royden and ors v Barnetts Solicitors Liverpool ET Case no. 2103451 / 07) demonstrate the very real potential for large numbers of claims being brought by employees not prepared to move after a transCase no. 2103451 / 07) demonstrate the very real potential for large numbers of claims being brought by employees not prepared to move after a transfer.
The lower courts» decisions in this case always seemed to me to be too pure for real life, form over substance.
Research by Brown and Marchant found that the decision - specific framework of MCA 2005 was at odds with real life cases in which practitioners were confronted with mounting concerns that escalate and change over time (see H Brown and L Marchant (2013), Using the MCA in Complex Cases, 18 Tizard Learning Disability Reviecases in which practitioners were confronted with mounting concerns that escalate and change over time (see H Brown and L Marchant (2013), Using the MCA in Complex Cases, 18 Tizard Learning Disability RevieCases, 18 Tizard Learning Disability Review 2).
We will go through in detail how to read judge's decisions, as well as how case law is applied in real cases.
Antitrust News: FTC Issues Significant State Action Immunity Decision in Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Case
Because this type of information is automatically pushed in near real - time directly to the lawyer's device, it can be highly valuable in identifying new business opportunities, beating the competition and making sure not to miss critical decisions or judgments that could impact a case.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) issued a judgment on important jurisdictional matters for cartel follow on cases; while it is being criticised for what it says (or does not say) about the applicability of arbitration clauses, its real practical meaning may lie in the claimant - friendly and clear decision that cartel victims can sue cartelists in the court of the cartel victim's domicile.
The nice aspect of this published decision, with respect to 1021.5 jurisprudence, is that it held a claimant seeking no monetary award could still be held to have an overriding financial interest and, separately, that even an «indirect» financial interest — in this case, competitive survival — certainly allowed trial judges to consider such an interest (gauging whether it was real or speculative in nature).
Each report is interactive and updates in real time so you can perform early case assessment (ECA), make informed staffing decisions more quickly, and triage review.
In the case at hand, the Administrative Judge considered that the Union benefited from the application of this presumption, and that Delastek failed to establish convincingly that the work reduction by which it sought to justify the position abolitions was real, and that, instead, the decision was «clearly tainted by anti-union animus» (our translation).
Although today most real estate laws are based upon federal and state statutes, there are still cases in which there are unique issues which arise that require judges and lawyers to follow the decisions of judges which were established under the common law system.
I've not spilled quite as much real ink (online is different) about the recent SCC decision in Resurfice v. Hanke which has one of those «out of the blue» pronouncements of law that had nothing to do with the disposition of the issues in case: the SCC's declaration that fault and increased risk may sometimes be enough to satisfy tort's causation requirement, even though the injured person can not establish, on the balance of probability, that the fault was a (factual) cause of the injury.
``... the distinction between independent expert evidence assisting a jury to find facts and usurping the jury's function [was] likely to be blurred in a majority of cases of rape... [W] here the facts of cases vary a great deal and a decision has to be case specific, general expert evidence that can not focus on the credibility of the individual case would be of little real value.»
What the case does not address are the very real issues of privacy that are raised by the broad publication of administrative tribunal decisions.
The real significance of the case, however, was that it was another in the line of important judicial decisions over the centuries as to the limits of the powers of the executive.
The CAT appears to be making real efforts by its case management decisions to make the Tribunal available to SMEs.
It's a decision that stands in sharp contrast to Van Breda, where Canadian courts were able to claim jurisdiction, for a case involving injuries on a Cuban resort, based on a test establishing «real and substantial connection» to Canada.
Based on defined objectives, these tools provide insight across all matters so legal operations professionals can easily track the progress of cases, counsel and legal bills in real time, evaluate pricing models, technology options and staffing decisions, reuse data for efficiencies, and use data to inform any number of strategic decisions.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z