Sentences with phrase «real climate scientists told»

As we know from basic quantum mechanics, bosons like a company (as opposed to fermions who obey Pauli exclusion principle) and this means, probably, that there is slightly higher probability for new photon from GHG - s to be radiated upwards (btw I asked this question some 5 years ago at Realclimate, and real climate scientists told me that this should be negligible, I tend to agree).

Not exact matches

He does not believe in the slightest that climate change is real and tells us that he can find many a eminent scientist who would back up his claim.

He does not believe in the slightest that climate change is real and tells us that he can find many a eminent scientist who would back up his claim.

«For climate negotiators to do their job, they have to realize what climate science is telling them: climate change is real and urgent and requires strong action now,» said one of the signers, Richard Somerville, a climate scientist at the University of California, San Diego, and an I.P.C.C. author.

one particular pro-hoax web site calling itself «Real Climate» which tells us that it is all about «climate science from climate scientists&raquClimate» which tells us that it is all about «climate science from climate scientists&raquclimate science from climate scientists&raquclimate scientists»,....

Im sure, though, that Zachary will be along any second now to tell us just how wrong Judith was and how she isn't a real climate scientist (which is actually probably a compliment:).

The Earth's climate history should tell any real scientist that CO2 has nothing to do with «driving» temperature — if there is a relationship it runs in reverse — temperature (of the ocean surface, in particular) drives CO2 levels.

Harris continuously stressed the scientific consensus for climate alarmism, referring to «the broad scientific understanding that global warming is real, man - made and potentially catastrophic» and told Singer that «so many scientists disagree with you.»

Apparently the majority of climate scientists are too busy imagining what global warming will do to us to read that non peer - reviewed, non otherwise - reviewed, book that tells them what real climate is actually doing.

As we have documented in numerous articles on the disinformation campaign on this website, although responsible scientific skepticism is necessary for science to advance, the climate change disinformation campaign has been involved not in the pursuit of responsible scientific skepticism but in tactics that are morally reprehensible including: (a) telling lies about mainstream climate scientific evidence or engaging in reckless disregard for the truth, (b) focusing on unknowns about climate science while ignoring settled climate change science, that is cherry - picking the evidence, (c) creating front groups and Astroturf groups that hide the real parties in interest behind claims, (d) making specious claims about «good science», (e) manufacturing science sounding claims about climate change by holding conferences in which claims are made and documents are released that have not been subjected to scientific peer - review, and (d) cyber bullying journalists and scientists.

Jim likes to say, «I am not a gambler, so who am I to go against 97 % of climate scientists are telling us that climate change is real and we need to do something about it.

If you were able to poll each of them, what percentage of the scientists would tell you climate change is real and we humans are causing it?

It makes it difficult to accept Real Climate is really objective about anything (and yes I tell my less scientifically literate family and friends about this behaviour of climate scientists if AGW comes up in conversation — they are not imprClimate is really objective about anything (and yes I tell my less scientifically literate family and friends about this behaviour of climate scientists if AGW comes up in conversation — they are not imprclimate scientists if AGW comes up in conversation — they are not impressed).

Picking up on Pete's point in # 123 that he is troubled by not knowing exactly what climate scientists are trying to tell us about where we currently stand in regard to tipping points and todays ABC article on the acceleration of climate change which includes the comment: «But many experts confide privately what they aren't yet ready to announce publicly: Change is accelerating at a dramatic rate» (URL below) I would find it very helpful if someone from Real Climate could tell us the summary message you want to get across to the public regarding tipping points — is it the «alternative version» I set out in # 75 above or is it a modified version of this, if so it would be great if you could post the modified version up here — I would love to hclimate scientists are trying to tell us about where we currently stand in regard to tipping points and todays ABC article on the acceleration of climate change which includes the comment: «But many experts confide privately what they aren't yet ready to announce publicly: Change is accelerating at a dramatic rate» (URL below) I would find it very helpful if someone from Real Climate could tell us the summary message you want to get across to the public regarding tipping points — is it the «alternative version» I set out in # 75 above or is it a modified version of this, if so it would be great if you could post the modified version up here — I would love to hclimate change which includes the comment: «But many experts confide privately what they aren't yet ready to announce publicly: Change is accelerating at a dramatic rate» (URL below) I would find it very helpful if someone from Real Climate could tell us the summary message you want to get across to the public regarding tipping points — is it the «alternative version» I set out in # 75 above or is it a modified version of this, if so it would be great if you could post the modified version up here — I would love to hClimate could tell us the summary message you want to get across to the public regarding tipping points — is it the «alternative version» I set out in # 75 above or is it a modified version of this, if so it would be great if you could post the modified version up here — I would love to hear it.

The brave, truth - telling, heretic, maverick scientist now uses her new - found iconic status with the lipstick on a pitbull crowd to cash in as the «go - to» showpiece «real climate scientist» with a Faux News contract, an eagerly sought participant in numerous «fair and balanced» panels and speaking engagements, hired as a senior fellow with Heritage, AEI, CEI, etc., etc..

«It's a real problem... it shows that there really is something that needs to be fixed in the climate models,» climate scientist John Christy, a professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, told FoxNews.com at the time.