Sentences with phrase «real climate scientists working»

If that makes the science unsettled when compared to the billions of data points accumulated by thousands of real climate scientists working over fifty years, then nothing will ever be settled enough for you.

Not exact matches

The new work by PNNL and LBNL scientists showcases a real - world example of this phenomenon and explores the implications for Earth's climate.

Just days later, a real - time analysis by scientists working with Climate Central's World Weather Attribution program has found that global warming has boosted the odds of such an extreme rainfall event in the region by about 40 percent — a small, but clear, effect, the scientists say.

We know, based on the work and expertise of the vast majority of climate scientists and virtually every leading scientific organization in the world, that human - caused climate change is real and dangerous.

However, they ignore the work scientists have done examining the past climate record in the 90's and 00's which gives us a real comparison of today's changes against the record of the past.

Well, one thing they don't have in common is that the vast majority of working, publishing climate scientists have concluded that global warming is real, is caused by us, and will have drastic consequences for millions of people in the next few decades.

Meanwhile, out here in the real world there has been no warming for nearly 18 years (according to RSS no stat sig warming for 26 years in fact) and as far as I can count the number of papers desperately making contradictory excuses for that now exceeds 30, and the «climate scientists» are still trying to work out how many angels can dance on the head of a pin — which is becoming increasingly obvious to all and sundry, except the aforesaid «climate scientists» of course.

At least four independent peer - reviewed studies, using different methods, have found that around 95 - 97 percent of climate scientists or their peer - reviewed work agree that global warming is real, caused by humans, and potentially a serious threat.

Institutions that let men prey on young women also look past demeaning and harassing public behavior, such as a senior male scientist recently describing me as «not a real climate scientist» despite having a Ph.D., or belittling me as «someone [he had] never heard of» when discussing my professional work.

Everyone generally is taught standard AGWScienceFiction fisics as if it is real world and I have given a range of sources to show that what I am arguing against is the standard teaching in education, certainly all climate scientists working to the AGW energy budget use it as a given.

Perhaps some climate scientists have learned through observation that the real power lies in Washington and that being untruthful works well there.

Too bad that you have chosen to be part of this group of Deniers, denying the current consensus of real working climate scientists.

Taking a neutral stance at this point on work from «NIPCC» (Fred Singer et al.), suggesting that this kind of effort «competes» with the work of several of the world's climate scientists and a large number of multidisciplinary specialists contributing to IPCC reports combined with the additional scientists and many others who raise real questions that result from reading, reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and discussion of the science, is just not credible, in my humble opinion.

Taking a neutral stance at this point on rehashed work from «NIPCC» (Fred Singer and friends), well known for serial, serious errors in overall interpretation, analysis and communication of the science and transparent but largely unexamined ideological bias at play in their playground «reports» — never mind suggesting that this kind of effort «competes» with the work of the world's climate scientists and the 2,500 multidisciplinary specialists contributing to IPCC reports combined with the tens of thousands of additional scientists and many others who raise real questions that result from reading, reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and discussion of the science, knowledgeably and in good faith and with open identification of the nature of the social and political issues — is just not credible.

This legislative session, we sponsored a successful bill called Climate - Safe Infrastructure bill, which was all about getting state engineers to talk to climate scientists who have been doing groundbreaking work in California so that we can understand impacts better and apply that information to real - world decisions around dams, bridges, highways, buiClimate - Safe Infrastructure bill, which was all about getting state engineers to talk to climate scientists who have been doing groundbreaking work in California so that we can understand impacts better and apply that information to real - world decisions around dams, bridges, highways, buiclimate scientists who have been doing groundbreaking work in California so that we can understand impacts better and apply that information to real - world decisions around dams, bridges, highways, buildings.

Hear from communicators and designers working with climate change scientists to put a planet's worth of information in your hand via mobile apps, interactive websites, near real - time visualizations, and social media.

For more forecasting work from the UK Met Office and by scientists from the Met Office and 12 other international research centres: «Real - time multi-model decadal climate predictions ``, Doug M. Smith, Climate Dynamics, December 2012 — Red emphasisclimate predictions ``, Doug M. Smith, Climate Dynamics, December 2012 — Red emphasisClimate Dynamics, December 2012 — Red emphasis added.

The broadcast news discussion of climate change, unfortunately, continues to barely resemble the real - world discussion of climate change, where scientists are hard at work figuring out whether its impacts are going to be bad or really bad.