Sentences with phrase «real criticism of»

1) He's never acknowledged the very real criticism of his «Gaia Theory» which has teleological issues.

No real criticism of her in my comment.

This is true, but misses the real criticism of the alien hypothesis.

My only real criticism of Driver: San Francisco is that it doesn't take its silly premise anywhere near seriously enough.

And for the first half of the game, that was my only real criticism of Specter of Torment.

In fact, aside from the disappointing online mode, my only real criticism of it is the fact that your in - game character, Jackie Estacado, walks as though he has two - ton anvils strapped to his feet.

My only real criticism of the battle system is that the post encounter experience distribution is a little uneven.

Sad thing is, though, Valve won't listen to the people who are making any REAL criticism of their products.

I only have one real criticism of Pyre, and that is that the ending feels flatter than a pancake.

Our one real criticism of the updated SQ5's exterior aesthetic is Audi's decision to abandon four distinct exhaust ports in favor of a stylized lower bumper.

If we have any real criticism of the car, it's that the Kia Sorento doesn't really fare that well as an off - roader.

Our only real criticism of the interior is the fiddly operation of the stubby gear lever.

Not exact matches

That criticism is a very fair one, because if you build a company to the size of TOMS that's able to do real good and create jobs then why not do it?

And where Gladwell drew criticism for being a dilettante, Ranadivé — the founder and CEO of real - time software company TIBCO — has been working in this field for some time, both in his day job and as an author (it's his third book on the subject).

Asked why none of his criticism of Trump seemed to put a crack in the real - estate mogul's armor, Beck paused.

Here are some current criticisms of how the theory doesn't always hold up well in the real world:

In this, our final installment on common criticisms of ESOPs — and why they are wrong — we'll look at the assertion that ESOPs are not real ownership.

With reason restored to its proper place in the world, we are not susceptible to the criticism of Thomas that we are making an illegitimate transition from the ideal to the real order.

He believes there is some point to the criticisms that Bultmann dissolves Christology into soteriology, 3 for he has been unable «to express in an adequate way the «objective» reality of the revelatory event Jesus the Christ «4 even though he does «intend a divine act in the fully real and «objective» sense.

Jeffrey Tayler's criticism of religion misses the real choice which Christianity and secularism represent.

However, the task which the Whiteheadian critique poses for Pannenberg is to specify a framework for grounding the real metaphysical identity of individuals, given his criticisms of the idealist project (e.g., MG 45).

These criticisms are many, and one of the real gems of McGovern's book is his summary discussion of them.

If, said Mr. Chicken, «for every criticism of the Pope you wished to make online, you were to pay for the privilege by first performing an act of real charity for someone in secret (for you can not be certain that the comment you planned on making is such), then we would have a holier Church and a lot more gentle comments.»

For not only was Aristotle highly sensitive to the perils of determining the real by means of the logical — this was, after all, his chief criticism of Plato's theory of the Forms 6 — but Whitehead himself tirelessly attacked the tendency to mistake logical relationships for the structure of the real, an ultimate case of what he called «the fallacy of misplaced concreteness».

Yet, as John Paul II has observed, they fail to realize that their criticism is itself based on a prior, unwarranted reduction of the natural to the material - the real naturalistic fallacy.

Anyone familiar with the more intellectual forms of pop criticism (whether of music or film) will recognize it as a parody of the Rolling Stone critic — a parody so good that, for a moment, one is almost convinced the piece is the real thing:

Once that's in place, you tend to reject any criticism of Jesus outright, more than you would any real person you love.

, That Rylaarsdam's criticism is in part, at least, based on a misunderstanding of Buber's position and a difference in Rylaarsdam's own a priori assumptions is shown by his further statements that «Because of his individual and personal emphasis the notion of an objective revelation of God in nature and history involving the whole community of Israel in the real event of the Exodus does not fit well for him,» that Buber's view of revelation is «essentially mystical and nonhistorical,» and that «the realistic disclosure of Yahweh as the Lord of nature and of history recedes into the background because of an overconcern with the experience of personal relation» — criticisms which are all far wide of the mark, as is shown by the present chapter.)

In fact, its chief claim to relevance consists in the pertinence of its criticisms and the power of its vision of alternative real possibilities.

But as this unmaking of religion reveals that religion is «true», in the sense that it is an invention of human beings to compensate for and to sublimate their real wretchedness, a second kind of criticism has to follow: religion has to be made false, i.e., the secular world has to be changed.

Even in the light of Phillips's criticism of Godsey, it may be questioned whether a real distinction can be made between ecclesiology and the doctrine of Christ in Bonhoeffer.

This is true not only because, as we have seen, the memory of Jesus himself is embedded in the life of the church and is carried in its heart — a memory which no historical criticism can possibly discredit — but also because the real medium of the revelation is the event as a whole, and not any particular part of the event, however important.

(Adventures of Ideas, New York: The Free Press, 1967, 166) William Christian notes that»... the real target of this criticism is the view that God is omnificent, that all effective agency in the universe is to be ascribed to God.

If thinkers as diverse as Rousseau, Paine, and Tonnies are all to be understood as Utopian insofar as they criticize the present from the standpoint of a real or imagined past, then utopianism is an honored mode of cultural criticism.

Constructive criticism is surely good, and if it is offered in a spirit of real charity the individual concerned will be able to discern the best forum for airing it.

If it is unintelligible (as Griffin and Hartshorne insist that it is), this will not count as a criticism of what Griffin calls «traditional theodicy,» nor will it have any real bearing on the adequacy of various positions taken in the contemporary, philosophical literature on the problem of evil.

Hasker believes, of course, that his idea of God corresponds to the real God, so he is naturally upset by criticisms of his idea of God, because he regards these as criticisms of the very Creator to whom we owe our existence.

This beloved Now, so real and special to ourselves, is already slithering off into «the dark backward and abysm of time»: Soon it will be something odd - seeming and remote, an historical period, an object for detached criticism, for a later generation's reforming zeal.

The bulk of West's response, which does not mention Schindler by name, speaks to his main criticism: that West underestimates the real power of concupiscence.

But to a much greater extent, Westberg believes that legitimate criticisms led us to cast away a tradition of real depth, nuance, and staying power.

I think criticism of the pre-Conciliar Church is often overblown, but there were real problems in need of fixing and real opportunities in need of seizing.

Despite his manager's criticism, Hazard insists he has a huge amount of respect for the former Real Madrid coach and believes his style of management is making him a better player.

He may have had more than his fair share of criticism since signing for Arsenal from Real Madrid last summer, but there is no doubt that Arsene Wenger sees the Germany international play maker as absolutely vital to his plans for the Gunners.

Real Madrid president Florentino Perez insists his relationship with Cristiano Ronaldo is «perfect» following the 29 - year - old forward's criticism of the club's transfer policy over the # 59.7 m sale of Angel Di Maria to Manchester United --(Daily Telegraph)

But the Frenchman has for the first time been the subject of real criticism from some supporters after a fourth consecutive season without a trophy and has hardly ruled out a possible move to Spain.

Arsene has stayed with this club through the tough times, he has stayed through the criticism from the fans (some of it simply abhorrent) even though he didn't have to, he could have left for Real Madrid numerous times, bought who he liked, won what he wanted.

In turn, their hopes of finishing in the top four and securing qualification for the Champions League are at real risk and coupled with Wenger's future still being uncertain, it has led to criticism from supporters and protests against him staying on beyond this season.

They have a number of promising young centre backs who ought to be given an opportunity to prove themselves for the remainder of the season in the EPL matches.They simply can not be worse than the rapidly declining Koscielny and Mustafi who can not cope with the likes of Swansea, Bournemouth etc. let alone a team like Spurs.The lack of steel at the back impacts on our more attacking players as they know they need to score 2/3 goals to have any chance of producing a win.As usual Elneny has come in for criticism but the real culprits are our centre backs and Xhaka who seems to be a fixture regardless of being bang average.

And at the wages this lot earn all are fair game for criticism of real fans of the club beginning at the top....

There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)