Sentences with phrase «real discussion of»

And there's no real discussion of the principle of reasonable prospect of removal to justify prolonged detention.

And did Roberts fulfill his apparent purpose of getting attention for his position, or in doing so, did he obscure any real discussion of either side.

In this way, EPA both expedited its task by using «ready made» external reports, and avoided any real discussion of the many scientific uncertainties surrounding climate change.

A case in point is the truly amazing absence in the Garnaut Review of any real discussion of Solar Radiation.

Most companies featured on the score table above lacked any real discussion of toxics like PVC and BFRs.

They also take up precious real estate, which you could otherwise devote to a real discussion of your artist's practice.

But I also think that this year, 2015, is gonna pretty much put the nail in the coffin for the old way of thinking, because the «othered» books, and the audiences for those books, and the creators of those books, are dominating any real discussion of the medium AND the industry, and the folks who haven't gotten with the program look foolish as hell.

A little bit of critical distance could surely only have helped make this is a real discussion of the issues, not just a vivid depiction of them.

The media won't cover it, and the FDA has criminalized any real discussion of this by licorice root manufacturers or supplement companies.

It should have been a thoughtful format that allowed for real discussion of the issues, and it was a lost opportunity.»

«Property taxes are not really a big issue and I think it's a little more of a distraction away from the real discussion of the other stuff that's impacting the city of New York.»

Instead of engaging in a real discussion of those issues, both houses of the Legislature have offered proposals in the last few days that would only increase income inequality in our city,» Figueroa said.

But despite the noise, both parties are avoiding real discussion of the subject.

No real discussion of MVNOs.

Between real discussions of epistemology and logics and «elegant statements,» there's a gap that Mr. T can't hide.

Not exact matches

Not all real estate markets would call for any sort of a discussion like this.

Any project like this has the risk of making people uneasy — and we live in a world where some people find offense in everything you do — but there was a real, sensitive discussion and no one was offended.

We then had a fairly extensive and honest discussion about the real implications of what is happening.

PARIS Bundesbank Panel discussion with Vice President of the Bundesbank Prof. Dr. Claudia Maria Buch, Title: «Have the main advanced economies become more resilient to real and financial shocks?»

But when it's a technical issue, and we're debating what's the future of AI is it this architecture or that architecture, I want the engineers to come in with data and real intensity so we get to the right answer and the deep technical discussions.»

But despite frequent federal government discussion of the matter, Ottawa lacks any real authority to make progress — professional regulatory bodies are a provincial matter.

«Real discussions oftentimes lead to settlements and lead to a conclusion of hostilities, and I think that's likely to be the case here.

Cliqz, the German privacy browser that bought anti-tracking plugin Ghostery in February, believes the discussions don't solve the real problem of privacy and tracking.

Even though the announcement indicated that this change in direction had yet to be reflected in any real actions other than a discussion by the company board of directors, NextGen's share price jumped 22 %.

Here, I would like to focus on one critical aspect of the discussion: that monetary policy can affect financial stability only through its effects on household debt, even though it affects a wide swath of the real economy.

This discussion also does not consider any specific facts or circumstances that may be relevant to holders subject to special rules under the U.S. federal income tax laws, including, without limitation, certain former citizens or long - term residents of the United States, partnerships or other pass - through entities, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, «controlled foreign corporations,» «passive foreign investment companies,» corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, banks, financial institutions, investment funds, insurance companies, brokers, dealers or traders in securities, commodities or currencies, tax - exempt organizations, tax - qualified retirement plans, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons that own, or have owned, actually or constructively, more than 5 % of our common stock and persons holding our common stock as part of a hedging or conversion transaction or straddle, or a constructive sale, or other risk reduction strategy.

The minutes then turned to the discussion of participants» views on current conditions and their outlook, which is where the real meat of the minutes begins.

The issue of foreign - ownership in Vancouver's residential real estate is becoming increasingly divisive and an inclusive, fact - based discussion of the issue is long overdue.

Some Prefatory Remarks to the N.Y.U. Real Estate Institute discussion, Oct. 25, 2001 Economic theory focuses on labor and capital, yet the largest category of tangible assets is not industrial plant and machinery earning profits, but real estate, and its primary objective is to make capital gaReal Estate Institute discussion, Oct. 25, 2001 Economic theory focuses on labor and capital, yet the largest category of tangible assets is not industrial plant and machinery earning profits, but real estate, and its primary objective is to make capital gareal estate, and its primary objective is to make capital gains.

But at the heart of this discussion is the level of the real rate of interest.

At a web startup, our board meetings were discussions of the real world results of testing our hypotheses from Customer Discovery.

There is a forum for all kinds of discussion from an introduction forum to dividends and even real estate investing.

Doug Saunders, of the Globe and Mail, has gamely launched a real and meaningful discussion about corporate tax cuts on these pages.

So this gets very technical of various points but I think it's important for people to hear because they can really quickly learn how real this stuff is at the start of our mastermind discussion.

There have been lots of discussions around the Hill House lately about investing in rental real estate.

Displaying what Donald (now Dierdre) McCloskey once characterized as «the intellectual range from M to N,» there is no real comparison of the Fed's record with that of the system that preceded it; no mention of other monetary systems circa 1913 that had better records than the United States (most pertinently, that of Canada); not nearly enough acknowledgment of the great harm the Fed has caused more than once in its history; no discussion of why a few other central banks — though surprisingly, only a few — have performed better than the Fed; and no inkling that central banking may not be the best of all possible systems in the best of all possible worlds.

The reason why group interview articles are so great to read, is because they are usually packed with real life examples (not guesses or assumptions), case studies, tips from the field and some form of link building discussion.

3) The discussion about scaling vs. keeping it small is a very interesting one: I liked that the author presented real - life cases for either scenarios for food for thought instead of advocating one or the other (e.g. presenting a single «formula» as the golden rule that all shall follow)-- I can see how this particular decision can be case sensitive and there really is no «right» answer as long as it works for the entrepreneur!

Investing in real estate while holding a full time job may not always get the most discussion in the real estate investing world — but there are thousands (if not millions) of investors who do just that.

If you are using «South Park» as your source of information on ANYTHING (religion or otherwise), then you forfeit your right to be taken seriously in ANY real forum for discussion.

Quite frankly, I'm not interested in any «intelligent discourse which is little more than a circle jerk of a discussion where privileged people sit around and abstractly theorize about what the «real problems» of and «solutions to» marginalized people's problems that doesn't center the words and experiences of actual marginalized people and their own understanding of their own problems.

I do not want to open the floor to simple confirmations of what I am saying, but to real and genuine discussion as we earnestly explore truth and its implications together.

I can not help but think that his discussion of the Eucharist displays a real tension in Farrow's thinking.

(8) Evolutionary discussion often betrays a positivistic bias which sees scientific truth as the «real» truth about things, with other forms of truth, including religious truth, relegated to providing only an emotive, valuational and relativistic set of preferences about things.

This long discussion of the way in which past events are effectively and experientially present provides a context for considering the real presence of Jesus.

Our choice of topic is also occasioned by a recent discussion in The Tablet about the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, whether it is a physical presence or not.

I wouldn't expect a real discussion from either of them.

Most of the rhetoric is the «Jon Stewart style insult» which offers no real logical content and poisons the discussion besides.

In a great many cases the immediate discussion of these questions would only get in the way of the real discovery of the self.

Now, if CNN would give us REAL articles, with actual topics, at least a few people would start making comments worthy of consideration and discussion (there would still be yammering idiots on both sides of the aisle, but that's never going to change).