I know the Wittgenstein inspired bullet point presentation style leaves something to be desired, but just keep in mind it's not meant to create the impression of
any real exactitude.
Not exact matches
Everything exists on the periphery with little
exactitude or
real insights into this conflicted and intriguing man.
The goal is not formal perfection, or
exactitude with regard to any
real person, but another sort of precision, one that aims to, «make people intelligible through paint.»
The goal is not formal perfection, or
exactitude with regard to any
real person, but another sort of precision, one that aims, as she says, to «Make people intelligible through paint».
Is it any surprise that climate - change predictions in the
real world — where the complexities are exponentially greater and the
exactitude of knowledge much less — have such a poor track record?