The history of Protestantism has shown that real faith, which has to do with God and Christ and redemption and resurrection and sin and forgiveness, is not just a psychological or a political activity, and also that you can have
real faith without being in some sort of narrow orthodox mold.
It's impossible to have
real faith without an accurate knowledge.
Not exact matches
Snowboarder The fact mankind since the beginning of recorded history has filled that great unknown with belief (or unbelief) based on
faith without proof makes «The
Real One» self evident.
So you believe at least TWO things by
faith (i.e.
without evidence): 1) God exists 2) the God of the Holy Bible is
real, and all the rest are second - rate.
For
real «
faith» photos, he should have taken photos of people jumping out of airplanes
without parachutes.
Of course, to the man
without faith this appears to be both a piece of evasion of
real issues in that it shelves difficult problems, and a piece of wishful thinking in that it believes in the ultimate goodness of God in some nebulous hereafter, even though the daily evidence of life denies such goodness and love.
Or is the human race an infallible one so that any idea can be, move over should be, taken on
faith of its truth no matter the reality of things and then acted on
without concern of the
real truth which was «WILLFULLY» overlooked?
When we love our neighbour independent from his
faith (or colour, nationality, social status, etc.), we preach the gospel
without words and most effective, whereby it is God's work to cause the
real faith in someone.
The
real test of dialogue is whether people in one
faith community can make their own the prayers of another
faith tradition,
without making
faith traditions predatory or obsolescent.
The occasion for a dispute to arise was a superficial one, a matter of whether Jewish and Gentile Christians could eat together
without the Jews incurring defilement (Gal.2: 11 - 16), but Paul at once raised the
real and profound question whether the Law had not been superseded by the new and universal gospel that men can be saved by
faith in Jesus Christ.
But the author maintains the tension, and he has us turning the pages to the very end - not
without a couple of unexpected twists and cameo appearances from two
real life heroes of the
Faith.
For
faith is only
real when there is obedience, never
without it, and
faith only becomes
faith in the act of obedience.10
He remembers that there have been plenty of theologians down to the present day who by subtle doctrines and distinctions have not wanted to admit the meaning of that text from the Letter to Timothy, or who tried to evacuate its clear sense and force by saying that such non-Christians could not believe because they have not got the historical revelation of God's word and so could not be saved, because
without real faith salvation is impossible.
You can attempt to use the comments by anyone you like, strong or weak atheist or believer, but
without real evidence, all you have is an opinion and
faith.
Without it, we need some smart folks to explain it to us because it get's
real complicated trying to hold
faith, the gospel, eternal life, salvation, repentance, and all the other teachings together with any kind of congruity.
This «skip ahead» mentality invalidates the very
real experiences of King David and implies that we too can simply hop on over to the sunnier meadows of our
faith journey
without crossing the tough terrain that leads us there,
without working through our «first drafts.»
It is obvious that the only
real difference between a person who has
faith and good works and a person who has
faith without good works is the good works.
That, and we are doing a harming to our representation of Christianity if we discount struggles, sins and lulls as non-
faith periods — because we present the idea that
real faith is
without temptation, failure or dry spells.
It is kind of strange (and upsetting) that God made some people with the instinct and
faith to absolutly believe He is
real, and some people
without this belief.
At least I am realistic and lets be
real here
without the blind
faith which is cute sometimes but endlessly frustrating.
«
Without any
real detail it is impossible to put any
faith in the administration's claim that this proposal will make things better.
Without any
real detail, it's impossible to put any
faith in the administration's claim that their proposal will make things better:
Without knowing what the
real problem is, its easy for either partner in these relationships to get depressed, to become isolated, and to lose their
faith in marriage.
Joshua, «Do you think that VTG, or anyone else, accusing Judith of bad
faith in a blog comment (
without evidence, in at least your opinion) will have some
real world impact?
Do you think that VTG, or anyone else, accusing Judith of bad
faith in a blog comment (
without evidence, in at least your opinion) will have some
real world impact?