Sentences with phrase «real freedom of»

In the supposed freest nation of all, we want real freedom of choice for all women.

If a couple realise they started their marriage on a poor basis, it does not follow thatthey can reject their marriage vow; it should lead them to seek the grace to ground their relationship in the real freedom of the truth and goodness of their being, lived for God and for each other.

Theology is the highest indeed, and widest, but it does not interfere with the real freedom of any secular science in its own particular department.»

If, on the plane of moral evil rather than physical or «natural» evil, one replies that with the real freedom of the free will goes the real power of personal sanctifying grace to sweeten and transform our personalities if we will allow Him, the rejoinder comes, «well, yes, but if He is almighty why does He not stop me from sinning and going to hell?»

You want freedom of speech... for your opinion only — Lets rally around real freedom of speech, and the freedom to disagree with what's in vogue.

Later on, when you have an opportunity for real freedom of speech, you can write a letter to them and tell them what you REALLY think but it is always dangerous to burn career bridges.

respecting other religion is a real freedom of religion.

«The notion that Christians may exercise their faith on Sundays but forget about it when they step into work on Monday is not real freedom of religion and is not freedom of conscience,» Scoffield told the court.

Not exact matches

The lifestyle I can afford is amazing and I feel a real sense of freedom compared to my life back home.»

The threat Trump poses to the First Amendment and freedom of the press is very real.

«The biggest mistake I see these days is thinking that a business idea will automatically turn into a viable business model,» says Terri Lonier, president and founder of Working Solo, a New Paltz, New York - based business strategy consultancy, and author of Working Solo: The Real Guide to Freedom and Financial Success with Your Own Business.

Holly McKhann's podcast showcases stories of real estate investors whose savvy decisions made them achieve financial freedom, become «set for life» or even scale their efforts to hundreds of properties per year.

Of course, this guide is not an all - encompassing «how - to» manual about every aspect of investing in real estate, but a broad - stroke overview of the best ways to start down your path to financial freedom through real estate investmentOf course, this guide is not an all - encompassing «how - to» manual about every aspect of investing in real estate, but a broad - stroke overview of the best ways to start down your path to financial freedom through real estate investmentof investing in real estate, but a broad - stroke overview of the best ways to start down your path to financial freedom through real estate investmentof the best ways to start down your path to financial freedom through real estate investments.

I suspect he refers to the accounts of the failures of economies directed by state elites under the banner of «collective decision making» and «workers democracy», because all the literature on REAL workers» control shows it increases efficiency and, of course, freedom — it eliminates wage slavery.

There are a lot of fantastic reasons to start investing in real estate: financial freedom, family security, supplemental income, fulfilling the entrepreneurial spirit, escaping the nine to five and more.

Through real estate I feel I'll be able to have the freedom to make my own path; choose what type of business model i see could work; education myself in the subjects that are actually important in life; and finally the ability to choose family over work as opposed to hoping to find time for family.

One of the most commonly stated reasons that people give for investing in real estate is that they are seeking out financial freedom, but there are others as well — of course, each person will have their own personal reasons why.

Our Freedom Fund is comprised of all of our income - producing assets such as index - based investments, short - term reserves and a real estate property.

Well, the current structure of the real estate business, with the low - capital and «no prior education» requirements, combined with the highly enticing time freedom and large income potential, has attracted a certain element of humanity.

«It's a chance to have the freedom of working from home, the facilities of a real office, plus a social atmosphere and sense of community.»

A plan by Freedom Communications insiders to buy the assets of the bankrupt newspaper company is in danger of losing a key backer, jeopardizing their effort to retain control of the Orange County Register.Santa Ana real estate developer Mike Harrah said...

«While Wang has lost his power, his position and his freedom, the real losers here are investors who play by the rules, and our nation's financial system, which is diminished with every one of these schemes.»

Our Freedom Fund is comprised of the following income - producing assets: index - based investments, short - term reserves and a real estate property.

The freedom of the Christian, and the freedom of God to love and forgive «real sinners».

I'd like to believe that my good deeds and my bad deeds are acts of invisible men... but I can't help but feel empowered by my one and only REAL RIGHT and REAL FREEDOM, free choice.

This is about real science and unrestricted freedom of thought, daring to think higher than the droned group - think model.

Uniformity and absolute equality are the death of all real vigor and freedom in existence.

Perhaps that's the real freedom we should be worried about — not whether or not someone has the right to attempt to sabotage someone else's idea of a great club, but whether I have the right to form my own club that expresses my own ideas with people I choose to invite to associate with me.

The central allegation of paradox seems to me to run roughly as follows: a nontemporal divine experience would include in itself all events in time (cf. CSPM 105); but to experience all temporal events simultaneously would dissolve any real distinction between past and future (cf. CSPM 66); so there could be no temporal transition, no change, no contingency, and no freedom (cf. CSPM 137); and since nothing could become, there could be no real permanent and unchanging reality either, «for then the contrast between the terms, and therewith their meaning, must vanish» (CSPM 166).

WE have FOUR more years of REAL freedom!!!! OBAMA WON!!!!! EAT THAT CONSERVATROLLS!!!!!

To break categorically with the present evil aeon is to cut the ground from under one's feet, to open oneself physically to death by breaking with the power structure of an evil society, and to open oneself spiritually to death by renouncing self - seeking as a motivation and giving oneself radically to the needs of one's neighbour, as one's real freedom and love.

The all - determining notion of power which Barth in fact develops demonstrates divine freedom well enough but sometimes makes divine love and even the possibility of genuine divine relationship with a real «other» more difficult to conceive.

With regard to related matters, Barth preferred the term «constancy» to the traditional «immutability» because of his key emphasis on God's essential freedom but that finally amounts to a distinction without a real difference.

If the present occasions are to have their full share of freedom over against the future, the future must be the domain of real possibility in the sense of containing all that could or might be, as yet undetermined as to what will be.

There is evidence that the Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA)'s very real stylistic freedom is accompanied by a homogenous substance of beliefs and values.

God shares with the creatures the power of his being, allowing them a measure of freedom and spontaneity so that God's temporal interaction with the creatures is a real history of inter-communication and action.

Though blacks» tutelage has not been entirely self - incurred, the link between liberation and enlightenment is just as real for us: the black nonviolent disobedient realizes his own freedom by accepting the constraints of universal moral laws, by maintaining civility under strong provocation even when others do not.

Government is evil because it restricts the freedom of these actors, and it is the business sector that is to provide for our real, i.e., economic, needs.

If we remain mere amateurs in the actual Christian life, if we have not in some way accepted to obey a law within the context of Christian freedom and self - restraint, then we are no more than miserable bunglers even if we do not carry too much real ballast of historical piety.

There is considerable evidence that the UUA's very real stylistic freedom is presently accompanied by a homogenous substance of beliefs and values.

Process doctrines can go the whole way with existentialism in recognizing that man in his freedom may plunge into self - worship, or self - destruction; but this is because the real world has this risk within it, not because God wills that any creature should lose the meaning of life or decrees that any person should lose his possibility of knowing the good and doing it.

He thinks of his life and world as involving a real freedom, possibilities as yet unrealized, an open - ended future which he shapes partly by his own decisions.

First, it makes freedom and history intelligible as real aspects of being.

Where the atheist scientist sees only physical processes and laws that give rise to illusions of morality and free will, I see real beauty, truth, love, good and evil, purpose to life, freedom to choose and ultimate hope.

He exercises his creativity in a real world which has elements of spontaneity, of chance, and, at the higher levels, of moral freedom within it.

I had observed something that «bothered» me — in my own testimony, and in years of ministry with and to Christians — that is: the lack of real understanding of and Living in the Freedom we are supposed to have in Jesus.

Though two speak of «freedom of choice» and a few give no real theological rationale for their position, virtually all the statements of this type are concerned not with human freedom or women's rights, but with articulating solid theological and philosophical reasons for the position they take.

It still has the same intent and that's world domination at the expense of real freedom.

people leave the middle east and leave sharia in search of real freedom.

But the relief of REAL freedom and REAL choice inherent in the Obama and Senate wins is palpable, and we can also rest easy that the Supreme Court will not be filled up with more people - haters working against this country.