Sentences with phrase «real funding per»

Not exact matches

The real estate investment trust, based in New York, said it had funds from operations of $ 55 million, or 23 cents per share, in the period.

When you purchase a broad swath of equities, say an S&P 500 index fund, the returns you can expect over the next decade or so comprise four building blocks: the starting dividend yield, projected growth in real earnings per share, expected inflation, and the expected change in «valuation» — that is, the expansion or contraction in the price / earnings (P / E) multiple.

The Indianapolis - based real estate investment trust said it had funds from operations of $ 1.03 billion, or $ 2.87 per share, in the period.

The New Hyde Park, New York - based real estate investment trust said it had funds from operations of $ 157.8 million, or 37 cents per share, in the period.

The real estate investment trust, based in Jersey City, New Jersey, said it had funds from operations of $ 50.7 million, or 50 cents per share, in the period.

Private investments by the fund earned 11.6 per cent including 11.1 per cent by private equity, 12.3 per cent by infrastructure and 11.4 per cent by real estate.

«Even if you believe the managers at a fund like HYLD can beat the market — and they've run into some real issues over the past year on the performance front — do you think they can beat the market by 1.18 percent per year?»

In 2005, his hedge fund owned 5.4 per cent of Wendy's and Ackman was among a group of investors who successfully pushed the company to spin off Tim Hortons despite management's preference to simply sell off a stake in the donut chain along with some of its real estate.

In 37 states, pension contributions plus state - funded Medicaid grew by more than state and local government tax revenue between 2007 and 2014, in real per - capita terms.

As Chinese investor interest continue its rapid rise, experts predict that cross-border real estate funds flowing from China into the US will be the highest in the world by 2016,... Per saperne di più >

The magistrates claim they are facing a 3.5 per cent annual cut in real terms funding in the coming years, but Lord Falconer insisted that over the last decade, investment in the criminal justice system had gone up from two per cent of GDP to 2.5 per cent.

In an article for the Guardian's Comment is Free site, the shadow education secretary Andy Burnham says the Treasury's green book shows the pupil premium will «sit within» a schools budget that will see per pupil funding falling in real terms.

Funding is set to reduce by 20 per cent in real terms by 2014/15 or 14 per cent if council tax precepts are taken into account.

For many research advocates, the news today was a huge relief: Funding for science in the United Kingdom will remain constant in real terms at # 4.7 billion per year until 2021, according to a government spending review released today.

Its president, Maurício Lopes, a geneticist who took office in October, has promised to build up research on biomass technology and double EMBRAPA's funding for that area, which today stands at a modest 24 million real per year.

The Education Policy Institute estimates that by 2019 - 2020 there are unlikely to be any schools in England which will avoid a real terms cut in per pupil funding, even in areas benefiting from the new formula.

Without the extra funds, the think - tank predicts that schools will face a real - terms per pupil reduction of three per cent by the end of the parliament.

However, the Institute for Fiscal Studies brought us back to reality when it announced the next day that the additional funding meant a real terms cut of nearly five per cent until 2019.

By 2019 - 20, it is also believed that up to half of primary and secondary schools will be faced with significant real cuts in funding per pupil of between six and 11 per cent.

Funding comes from local business partners, including a local coffee shop and a real estate agent, the P&C and a garden levy of $ 5 per child per year (as part of the parent voluntary contribution).

It's true that New York charters get several thousand dollars less in operating funds per student than the city's district schools do — and, even more important, they do not get separate capital funding for facilities in Gotham's extremely pricey real - estate market.

Stating that allowing parents to use their 529 savings for K - 12 tuition «will erode the tax base that funds public schools» when it will benefit many middle class New Yorkers already taking a 2018 hit with lost state and local deduction opportunities; when the real world state budget impact is demonstrably negligible; and in a state that already spends more per public school pupil than any other — is simply poor public education.

Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, said: «Mainstream schools have to make # 3 billion in efficiency savings by 2019 - 20 against a background of growing pupil numbers and a real - terms reduction in funding per pupil.

As for the latter, states must to find ways to get charter schools to a decent level of per - pupil funding, plus facilities funding, if not in comparison to traditional public schools then at least in terms of real dollars.

The situation is likely to get even worse, as it's predicted that 17,942 (nine out of ten) primary and secondary schools in England and Wales will be hit by a real - terms cut in funding per pupil between 2015 - 19.

He also added that per - pupil funding would fall in real terms to «lower than the system has been used to over many years».

«It doesn't mean real terms protection per pupil, and it doesn't mean protection for all elements of schools funding.»

The School Cuts website has updated its data, showing that 17,942 schools are facing real terms cuts in funding per pupil.

«It will mean that the total schools budget will increase by # 2.6 bn between this year and 2019/20, and per pupil funding will now be maintained in real terms for the remaining two years of the spending review period to 2019/20,» Ms Greening said.

Yet despite Government pledges to make early years central to tackling inequality and enhancing social mobility, the funding per child has been frozen since 2013 - 14, meaning a 4.5 % cut per child in real terms.

uk which uses the DfE's forecasts for individual schools» funding per pupil in cash terms following the implementation of the proposed new funding formula, and the National Audit Office's predictions for cost increases facing schools, in order to produce forecasts for individual schools» funding per pupil in real terms compared to now.

But school leaders say the donations are creating an uneven playing field, with some schools axing their services to meet an estimated 8 per cent real - terms cut in school funding by 2020.

«The Institute for Fiscal Studies reported that all this additional funding does is to reduce the real terms cut from 6.5 per cent to 4.6 per cent between 2015 and 2019.»

Given what he knows about National Insurance and pension costs, he thinks that the right figure for a real - terms cut in funding over the life of the next Parliament from the IFS forecasts is closer to 12 than to seven per cent.

Rising costs and flat funding mean schools are facing real - terms cut in their funding of about 8 per cent over the next few years.

«The next Labour government will support our schools by giving them the resources they need, increasing per pupil funding in real terms and providing ring - fenced funding to end the pay cap and give our teachers the pay rise they deserve,» Rayner said today.

I would resist a 10 per cent cut in real terms over the coming parliament and seek to reverse the 25 per cent reduction in funding for the foundation stage.

One week ahead of the Autumn Statement (23 November), the National Union of Teachers (NUT) and the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL) are calling upon the Chancellor to urgently address the pressing issue of school funding and reverse the Government's policy of cutting funding per pupil in real terms.

Instead, budgets were being cut in real terms as the government had frozen per pupil funding and loaded on extra costs such as higher pension contributions, the statement added.

The letter calls for per - pupil funding to be protected in real terms, as well as a reversal of the # 600m cut to the education services grant, and a commitment to «sufficient funding» for sixth forms.

According to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, schools face a real terms cut in funding of 6.5 per cent by 2020.

He also said that, because of increasing pupil numbers, the school's budget would still amount to a real terms cut in funding per pupil.

A report released on Wednesday has found that although average funding per pupil will rise from # 5,447 in 2015 - 16 to # 5,519 in 2019 - 20 that amounts to a real - terms reduction once inflation is taken into account.

Kevin Courtney, the general secretary at the National Union of Teachers, said the government's policy of cutting per - pupil funding in real terms was putting education at risk.

The National Audit Office said schools faced an 8 % real - terms reduction in funding per pupil by 2019 - 20 and cost pressures could result in «significant risks» in making the necessary spending cuts.

The definite part of the department's approach is that real - terms funding per pupil will drop over the coming years; the uncertain part is how schools are able to respond based on their particular circumstances,» the report says.

«A $ 250 increase per student marks real progress toward the goal of an equitable funding system that treats all public schools fairly and empowers parents to choose the right learning environment for their kids.

But the real problem is that the Washington State legislature is under funding public schools in our state by about $ 3 billion per year compared to the national average.

Although school funding was maintained in real - terms per pupil under the Coalition Government, all additional funding was provided via the Pupil Premium, targeted at particular pupils and therefore distributed unevenly.2 Many schools had to use Pupil Premium funding simply to plug the gaps caused by cuts in the value of other funding.

Without the extra funds, the think - tank predicts school face a real - terms per pupil reduction of 3 per cent by the end of the parliament.